City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 20.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Mast Academy School (8.8 miles): | 94 |
| Mater East Academy Middle School (6.9 miles): | 65 |
| South Pines Academy School (19.5 miles): | 48 |
| Mater Academy East Charter High School (6.9 miles): | 32 |
| South Miami Senior High School: | 20 |
| Miami Senior High School (5.6 miles): | 16 |
| South Dade Senior High School (17.8 miles): | 5 |
| Icare - Baypoint Inc. East Kennedy Campus School (8.7 miles): | 1 |
South Miami Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Miami: | 44 |
| South Miami Senior High School: | 20 |
1
Dr. Patty Khuly
Nov 6, 2014 @ 5:05 am
What is the graduation rate at south miami senior high?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 7721
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 666-6359
Magnet Program.
Principal: Gilberto D Bonce
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 117
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: http://smsh.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 485 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (72%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (68%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 521 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (66%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (64%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 8% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (59%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (65%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (67%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (65%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (61%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (60%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 467 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (60%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (61%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (61%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (70%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22 (59%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (56%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (60%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (63%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 25% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 453 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1305 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1302 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1097 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1091 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 747 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 746 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (91%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 371 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1438 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1440 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1206 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1208 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 743 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 744 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 8% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (95%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 374 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1788 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1524 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 226 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 242 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1724 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 260 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1657 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%| Here: | 263 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 13%| Here: | 230 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 228 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1766 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1773 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 30%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 67
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 3| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 21%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1681 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1684 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 25%| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 255 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%| Here: | 242 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1771 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 35%| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 669 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 37 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 42 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 683 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 41 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 62
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 73%| Here: | 224 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 1840 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1867 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77| Here: | 1789 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 1872 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 45%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1896 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21| Here: | 1875 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1908 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1920 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71| Here: | 1848 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1954 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 73%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1965 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 45| Here: | 1920 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 645
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 56| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 584
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 53| Here: | 695 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 644
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: | 708 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 583
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 61| Here: | 710 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 587
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 289 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.