
Back to: Bonita Springs, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 66.
25571 ELEMENTARY WAY
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
Other nearby schools ratings:
Spring Creek Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Lee County:  49  Bonita Springs:  51  Spring Creek Elementary School:  66 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (239) 9470001 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 681
School type: Elementary
District Name: LEE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 9474690
Principal: Karen Leonardi
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 75
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/spc
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  90%  State average from 963 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  91%  State average from 963 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 963 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  80%  State average from 962 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 963 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  68%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  62%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  620  State average from 963 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 963 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  34%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  41%  State average from 963 schools:  47% 
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 367 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 367 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 348
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 348
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 209
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 209
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 71
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 115
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  93%  State average from 959 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  91%  State average from 959 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  92%  State average from 959 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  71%  State average from 959 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  81%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 959 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  78%  State average from 959 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  653  State average from 959 schools:  560 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 959 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  31%  State average from 959 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  41%  State average from 959 schools:  46% 
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 379 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 354
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 355
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 210
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 210
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  87%  State average from 954 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  91%  State average from 954 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  79%  State average from 954 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  67%  State average from 954 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 954 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  76%  State average from 954 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  57%  State average from 954 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 954 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  592  State average from 954 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 954 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  26%  State average from 954 schools:  51% 
Minority RateSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  38%  State average from 954 schools:  45% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 334
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 334
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 213
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 213
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 79
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  69%  State average from 862 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  79%  State average from 862 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 862 schools:  43% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  76%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  74%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  92%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  86%  State average from 862 schools:  68% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  585  State average from 862 schools:  539 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 862 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 865 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  73%  State average from 865 schools:  56% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 317
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  71%  State average from 848 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  64%  State average from 848 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  65%  State average from 848 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68%  State average from 848 schools:  62% 
Making Math GainsHere:  54%  State average from 848 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  73%  State average from 848 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  395  State average from 848 schools:  413 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 848 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  71%  State average from 848 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  70%  State average from 848 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 363 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 112
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 335
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 337
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 36
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 116
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 117
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 69
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 203
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 204
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 76
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 224
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 224
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 41
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 101
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 102
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 59
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 60
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  71%  State average from 834 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  66%  State average from 834 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  65%  State average from 834 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  69%  State average from 834 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  70%  State average from 834 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  401  State average from 834 schools:  412 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 834 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  70%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Minority RateHere:  63%  State average from 832 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1505  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  48%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1701  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  36%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  18%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1833  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  41%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  89%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  49%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1593  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  363  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  32%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  90%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1708  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  358  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  33%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  27%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  87%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1784  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  357  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  40%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1538  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1772  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1810  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1561  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1733  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  364  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1754  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  351  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 117
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 91%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1510  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1732  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1692  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  318  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1655  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1586  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  362  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1722  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  361  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1734  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  319  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  121  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  648  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Median NPRSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  73  State average:  61 
Initial Understanding (max 12)SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  122  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  662  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  335  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 79%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1251  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  292  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1448  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1494  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1378  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 116
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1574  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1598  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1419  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 178
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1420  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1503  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1514  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1438  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 76
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1654  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1668  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1415  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 254
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 121
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  621  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 114
Mean Scale ScoreSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  634  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 122
Mean Scale ScoreSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  634  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale ScoreSPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  652  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  661  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 110
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  287  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 55%
