|
Back to: Stanfield, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 32.
Address: 515 South Stanfield Road
Stanfield, WI 85272
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Darrin L. Johnson
Phone (verify before calling): (520) 424-3353
Fax: (520) 424-0300
Homepage: www.stanfield.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 6
Enrollment In 2002: 798
Enrollment In 2003: 786
Enrollment In 2004: 824
Enrollment In 2005: 737
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 84.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 84.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 45.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 15.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 44.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 13.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 42.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 12.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 46.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 13.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 41
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 9.74% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 43
Male Percent Tested: 102%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Hispanic Tested: 58
Hispanic Percent Tested: 104%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 445 schools: | 16.43% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 22.17% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 54.52% |
White Tested: 15
White Percent Tested: 75%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 5.25% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 12.00% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 667 schools: | 57.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 77
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 23.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 46.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 18.64% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 13.30% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 26.82% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 82
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 38
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Hispanic Tested: 63
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 23.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 19.65% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 21.61% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 47.17% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 15.87% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 91%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 8.02% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 634 schools: | 12.77% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 48.62% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 16
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 75.0% | | State average from 343 schools: | 39.62% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 39.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 66
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 30
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 77
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 753 schools: | 21.15% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Female Tested: 41
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 585 schools: | 10.75% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 30.99% |
Male Tested: 43
Male Percent Tested: 102%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 11.85% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 30.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 56
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 15.26% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 32.26% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.53% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 22.53% |
White Tested: 17
White Percent Tested: 85%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 474 schools: | 5.63% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 654 schools: | 19.42% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 37.75% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 658 schools: | 38.97% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 78
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 82
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Male Tested: 38
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 24.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 30.71% |
Hispanic Tested: 63
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 549 schools: | 19.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 33.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 30.00% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 629 schools: | 32.65% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 575 schools: | 21.48% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 91%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 8.57% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 18.37% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 10.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 34.60% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 16
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 358 schools: | 36.58% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 377 schools: | 31.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 66
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 30
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 77
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 44
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 59
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 29.73% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 602 schools: | 30.28% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.98% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 63%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 10.27% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 19.79% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 54.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 66
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 20.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 23
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 77%
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 11.55% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 11.14% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 11.95% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 93
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 18.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Tested: 41
Male Percent Tested: 89%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 4.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Hispanic Tested: 57
Hispanic Percent Tested: 95%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 38.83% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 630 schools: | 26.73% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 30.26% |
White Tested: 23
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 14.70% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 19.58% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 48.38% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 17.99% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 23
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 96%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 75.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 59.97% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 306 schools: | 29.49% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 70
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 84
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 62.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 6.70% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 6.64% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 83
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Male Tested: 43
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 60.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 37.28% |
Hispanic Tested: 59
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 47.13% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 532 schools: | 12.12% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 580 schools: | 24.38% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 63%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 531 schools: | 6.85% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 31.54% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 44.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 49.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 65
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 23
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 77%
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 93
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 3.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 18.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 41
Male Percent Tested: 89%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Hispanic Tested: 57
Hispanic Percent Tested: 95%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 577 schools: | 20.88% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 48.88% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 12.61% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 19.80% |
White Tested: 23
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 7.96% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 31.78% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 45.63% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 23
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 96%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 83.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 43.65% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 44.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 70
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 84
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 87
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 37.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 102%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 21.97% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 42.48% |
Male Tested: 41
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 20.48% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 37.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 54
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 39.0% | | State average from 321 schools: | 25.43% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 31.54% |
White Tested: 20
White Percent Tested: 91%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 324 schools: | 14.25% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 338 schools: | 18.16% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 50.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 63
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 103%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 21.13% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 37.53% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 76
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 14.84% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 16.07% |
Male Tested: 38
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 447 schools: | 35.90% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 18.14% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 32.58% |
Hispanic Tested: 51
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 59.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.46% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 20.83% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 27.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 56
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 16.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 69
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 20.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 3.0% | | State average from 286 schools: | 6.56% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 11.41% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Female Tested: 39
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 61.28% |
Male Tested: 45
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 14.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 26.68% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 53.89% |
Hispanic Tested: 62
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 34.52% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 46.21% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 92%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 308 schools: | 5.80% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 383 schools: | 16.83% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 67.71% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 18
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 266 schools: | 40.49% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 269 schools: | 37.65% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 246 schools: | 22.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 66
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 25
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 208 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 204 schools: | 28.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 74
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 39.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 6.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 18.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 66.24% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 7.21% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 8.84% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 23.75% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 325 schools: | 8.17% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 6.95% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 17.49% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 310 schools: | 10.79% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 7.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 8.01% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 205 schools: | 28.69% |
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 30.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 17.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 222 schools: | 2.66% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 324 schools: | 10.61% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 68
All Students Percent Tested: 83%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 35
Female Percent Tested: 90%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 33
Male Percent Tested: 77%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 48
Hispanic Percent Tested: 81%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
White Tested: 14
White Percent Tested: 93%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 16.86% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 71.0% | | State average from 410 schools: | 70.72% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 68
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 68
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 83%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 10.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 87
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 102%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 38.00% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 42.77% |
Male Tested: 41
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 39.95% |
Hispanic Tested: 54
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 325 schools: | 52.80% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 37.67% |
White Tested: 20
White Percent Tested: 91%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 25.47% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 54.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 44.97% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 62
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 102%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 41.83% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 75
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 16.12% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 64.0% | | State average from 441 schools: | 36.01% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 38.49% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 16.80% |
Male Tested: 37
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 48.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 39.01% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 446 schools: | 34.82% |
Hispanic Tested: 50
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 51.67% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 34.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 294 schools: | 10.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 56
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 17.23% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 69
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 370 schools: | 52.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 33.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 318 schools: | 10.20% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 85
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 439 schools: | 13.42% |
Female Tested: 40
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 20.03% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 19.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 49.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 13.00% |
Male Tested: 45
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 23.40% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 46.44% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 14.44% |
Hispanic Tested: 62
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 31.69% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 22.76% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 40.34% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 276 schools: | 6.26% |
White Tested: 12
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 12.06% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 380 schools: | 14.04% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 55.36% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 19.73% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 19
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 81.0% | | State average from 279 schools: | 63.98% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 260 schools: | 18.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 66
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 14.94% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 25
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 218 schools: | 44.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 17.0% | | State average from 217 schools: | 24.55% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 216 schools: | 28.37% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 75
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 296 schools: | 5.94% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 13.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 15.05% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 53.96% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 69
All Students Percent Tested: 84%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 42.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 13.02% |
Female Tested: 35
Female Percent Tested: 90%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Male Tested: 34
Male Percent Tested: 79%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 14.16% |
Hispanic Tested: 49
Hispanic Percent Tested: 83%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 381 schools: | 30.82% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 390 schools: | 23.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 40.30% |
White Tested: 14
White Percent Tested: 93%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 13.95% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 55.98% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 19.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 68
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 14.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 69
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 84%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 30.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 23.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 40.55% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 1.0% | | State average from 312 schools: | 5.63% |
|