U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
Forum City-Data.com Homepage

STEDMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL in Stedman, NC



Back to: Stedman, NC, North Carolina, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active North Carolina forum.

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2006 test average as compared to other schools in North Carolina) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 66.

Address:
7370 Clinton Road Hwy 24
Stedman, NC 28391


Principal: McFadyen Anne
Phone (make sure to verify first before calling): (910) 483-3886
Fax (make sure to verify first): (910) 483-0519
E-mail:
Homepage: www.ses.ccs.k12.nc.us/index.htm
Agency: Cumberland County Schools
Grade span: 2 - 5

School type: Regular school
School level: Primary School
  1. ABCs of Public Education
  2. AYP Read Grade 10
  3. AYP Math Grade 10

ABCs of Public Education
Expected Grow: Yes

High Grow: Yes

Change Ratio: 1.57

AYP: Safe Harbor

ABC Average Grow: Yes

AYP Read Grade 10

Percent Tested All Students:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1835 schools:  99.8%

Percent Tested White:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1524 schools:  99.9%

Percent Tested Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1687 schools:  99.6%

Percent Tested With Disabilities:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 805 schools:  99.3%

Percent Proficient All Students:
Here:  71.5%
State average from 1869 schools:  64.7%

Percent Proficient White:
Here:  75.9%
State average from 1498 schools:  74.8%

Percent Proficient Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  64.7%
State average from 1661 schools:  53.2%

Number Of Students Tested All Students: 203
Number Of Students Tested American Indian: 11
Number Of Students Tested Asian: 2
Number Of Students Tested Black: 19
Number Of Students Tested Hispanic: 8
Number Of Students Tested Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students Tested White: 157
Number Of Students Tested Limited English Proficiency: 5
Number Of Students Tested With Disabilities: 44

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met All Students: Met
Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met White: Met

Number Of Students All Students: 203
Number Of Students American Indian: 11
Number Of Students Asian: 2
Number Of Students Black: 19
Number Of Students Hispanic: 8
Number Of Students Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students White: 157
Number Of Students Limited English Proficiency: 5
Number Of Students With Disabilities: 44

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) All Students: 186
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) American Indian: 10
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Asian: 2
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Black: 17
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Hispanic: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) White: 145
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Limited English Proficiency: 3
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) With Disabilities: 37

Percent Proficient With Growth All Students:
Here:  77.4%
State average from 1869 schools:  68.9%

Percent Proficient With Growth White:
Here:  81.4%
State average from 1498 schools:  75.3%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal All Students: Met
Met AYP Proficiency Goal White: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth All Students: 176
Number Of Students Included In Growth American Indian: 10
Number Of Students Included In Growth Asian: 2
Number Of Students Included In Growth Black: 16
Number Of Students Included In Growth Hispanic: 6
Number Of Students Included In Growth Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students Included In Growth White: 136
Number Of Students Included In Growth Limited English Proficiency: 3
Number Of Students Included In Growth With Disabilities: 31

Percent Met Growth Expectation All Students: 60.8
Percent Met Growth Expectation White: 63.2

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent All Students:
Here:  95.8%
State average from 1812 schools:  95.4%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent White:
Here:  95.5%
State average from 1492 schools:  95.3%

Number Of Students Economically Disadvantaged: 97
Number Of Students Tested Economically Disadvantaged: 97

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Economically Disadvantaged: 85

Percent Proficient With Growth Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  72.9%
State average from 1661 schools:  57.1%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal Economically Disadvantaged: Met with Safe Harbor

Number Of Students Included In Growth Economically Disadvantaged: 81

Percent Met Growth Expectation Economically Disadvantaged: 55.6

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  95.7%
State average from 1655 schools:  94.7%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met Economically Disadvantaged: Met

AYP Math Grade 10

Percent Tested All Students:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1835 schools:  99.8%

Percent Tested White:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1523 schools:  99.9%

Percent Tested Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1691 schools:  99.6%

Percent Tested With Disabilities:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 798 schools:  99.4%

Percent Proficient All Students:
Here:  87.6%
State average from 1869 schools:  76.9%

Percent Proficient White:
Here:  89.0%
State average from 1497 schools:  61.8%

Percent Proficient Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  82.4%
State average from 1665 schools:  77.6%

Number Of Students Tested All Students: 203
Number Of Students Tested American Indian: 11
Number Of Students Tested Asian: 2
Number Of Students Tested Black: 19
Number Of Students Tested Hispanic: 8
Number Of Students Tested Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students Tested White: 157
Number Of Students Tested Limited English Proficiency: 5
Number Of Students Tested With Disabilities: 44

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met All Students: Met
Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met White: Met

Number Of Students All Students: 203
Number Of Students American Indian: 11
Number Of Students Asian: 2
Number Of Students Black: 19
Number Of Students Hispanic: 8
Number Of Students Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students White: 157
Number Of Students Limited English Proficiency: 5
Number Of Students With Disabilities: 44

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) All Students: 186
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) American Indian: 10
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Asian: 2
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Black: 17
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Hispanic: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) White: 145
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Limited English Proficiency: 3
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) With Disabilities: 37

Percent Proficient With Growth All Students:
Stedman Elem:  89.8%
State average from 1869 schools:  77.7%

Percent Proficient With Growth White:
Here:  91.0%
State average from 1497 schools:  60.0%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal All Students: Met
Met AYP Proficiency Goal White: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth All Students: 176
Number Of Students Included In Growth American Indian: 10
Number Of Students Included In Growth Asian: 2
Number Of Students Included In Growth Black: 16
Number Of Students Included In Growth Hispanic: 6
Number Of Students Included In Growth Multi-Racial: 6
Number Of Students Included In Growth White: 136
Number Of Students Included In Growth Limited English Proficiency: 3
Number Of Students Included In Growth With Disabilities: 31

Percent Met Growth Expectation All Students: 59.1
Percent Met Growth Expectation White: 61.8

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent All Students:
Here:  95.8%
State average from 1812 schools:  95.4%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent White:
Here:  95.5%
State average from 1491 schools:  95.3%

Number Of Students Economically Disadvantaged: 97
Number Of Students Tested Economically Disadvantaged: 97

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Economically Disadvantaged: 85

Percent Proficient With Growth Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  84.7%
State average from 1665 schools:  78.6%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal Economically Disadvantaged: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth Economically Disadvantaged: 81

Percent Met Growth Expectation Economically Disadvantaged: 54.3

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  95.7%
State average from 1657 schools:  94.7%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met Economically Disadvantaged: Met

Back to: Stedman, NC, North Carolina, North Carolina forum, All US cities.