Stewart Middle Magnet School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 40.

1125 W SPRUCE ST
Tampa, FL 33607

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (10.1 miles):

92
Walker Middle School (12.4 miles):

74
Nina Harris Ese Center School (17.3 miles):

60
Pivot Charter School (15.6 miles):

46
Stewart Middle Magnet School:

40
Roland Park K-8 School (2.9 miles):

36
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School (3.6 miles):

21
Dropout Prevention School (19.9 miles):

9
Stewart Middle Magnet School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Stewart Middle Magnet School:

40

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 276-5691 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 284
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 276-5698
Magnet School.
Principal: Baretta Wilson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 5 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

585
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 883 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 882 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 260
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

541
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 888 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 887 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 862
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 841

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 861
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 841
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 353 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 636 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 635 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

517
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 876 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 875 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 279
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 844
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 825

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 847
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 829
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 283
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 624 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 623 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 596
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 580

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 599
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 584
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

528
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 880 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 880 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 280
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 861
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 627 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 627 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 186
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 609
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

430
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 887 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 886 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 264
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 859
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 859
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 70

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 339 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 90
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 324
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 324
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 87

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 263
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 263
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 609 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 609 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 169
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 590
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 590
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

417
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1917
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

323
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

1938
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

1732
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

1829
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 281
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1844
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

1825
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1912
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

312
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

274
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

66
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

285
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

689
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 284
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

317
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1625
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1633
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1543
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1725
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1729
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1664
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1855
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1856
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1758
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 98

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
STEWART MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:

1649
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1654
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1629
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 25

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1830
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1839
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1669
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 169

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1897
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1897
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1819
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 293
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 291
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 294
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 294
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 291
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 294
Mean Scale Score
Here:

711
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 290
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

321
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.