
Back to: Venice, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 29.
200 FIELD AVE E
Venice, FL 34285
Other nearby schools ratings:
Student Leadership Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Sarasota County:  48  Venice:  50  Student Leadership Academy School:  29 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Venice, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (941) 4855551 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 102
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 4852694
Principal: Vickie Marble
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 70
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.studentleadershipacademy.org
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  78%  State average from 612 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  84%  State average from 613 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  59%  State average from 612 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  56%  State average from 613 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  64%  State average from 612 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  46%  State average from 613 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  65%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  526  State average from 613 schools:  545 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  86%  State average from 614 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  57%  State average from 614 schools:  49% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 332 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 311
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 317
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 312
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 150
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 150
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 137
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 138
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 275 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 255
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 256
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 62
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 613 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  80%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 613 schools:  92% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  35%  State average from 613 schools:  49% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 613 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 613 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  68%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 613 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  553  State average from 613 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  82%  State average from 613 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  53%  State average from 613 schools:  48% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 295
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 294
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 148
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 147
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 238
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 243
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 237
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  72%  State average from 603 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  69%  State average from 603 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  62%  State average from 603 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  35%  State average from 602 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  60%  State average from 602 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  50%  State average from 602 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  62%  State average from 602 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  50%  State average from 602 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  460  State average from 602 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 604 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  80%  State average from 605 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  52%  State average from 605 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 344 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 344 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 307
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 310
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 159
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 126
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 230
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 233
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  68%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  68%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 539 schools:  91% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 538 schools:  44% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  55%  State average from 539 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 539 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  76%  State average from 539 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  545  State average from 539 schools:  523 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 539 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  26%  State average from 541 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  13%  State average from 542 schools:  53% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  75%  State average from 526 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  68%  State average from 526 schools:  63% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 526 schools:  89% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  76%  State average from 526 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  79%  State average from 526 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  84%  State average from 526 schools:  72% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  471  State average from 526 schools:  425 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 526 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  20%  State average from 525 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  12%  State average from 526 schools:  52% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 30
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 156
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 156
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 136
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 136
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  67%  State average from 505 schools:  59% 
Meeting High Standards in MathSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  61%  State average from 505 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 506 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  54%  State average from 505 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  48%  State average from 505 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  37%  State average from 505 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  349  State average from 506 schools:  397 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 506 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  23%  State average from 506 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  13%  State average from 506 schools:  50% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1353  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  12%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  17%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  3%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  70%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1521  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  22%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1636  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1750  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1866  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  328  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  36%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  33%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1876  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  48%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  12%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1%  State average:  3% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  61%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  10%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  52%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  40%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  40%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1%  State average:  2% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  45%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  8  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1430  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  17%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1537  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  67%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1723  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  27%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1751  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  36%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1886  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  14%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  73%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1915  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  19%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  50%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1415  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1550  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1602  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1768  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1748  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  320  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1494  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  342  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1539  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1664  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1728  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1754  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1926  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 101
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 90%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 90%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1429  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1479  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1561  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1666  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1866  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1905  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  292  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1505  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1430  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1611  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1720  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1854  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1951  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  101  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  633  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  638  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  9  State average:  10 
Interpretation (max 20)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  13  State average:  15 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  121  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  12  State average:  13 
Functional (max 18)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  665  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  8  State average:  8 
Critical Analysis (max 12)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  690  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Functional (max 18)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  15  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  74  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  688  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Median NPRSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  65  State average:  63 
Literary (max 18)STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 121
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  277  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 61%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 74
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  295  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1699  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  309  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1695  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1655  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 40
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1836  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1836  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1800  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 36
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1927  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1918  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1852  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 66
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  315  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1631  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1628  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1628  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 1
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1883  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1883  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1756  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 127
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000STUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  1943  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1944  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1846  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 99
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  683  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  695  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale ScoreSTUDENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY:  670  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  701  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  709  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 89
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  303  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
