U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Sugar Mill Elementary School in Port Orange, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Port Orange, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 77.

1101 CHARLES ST
Port Orange, FL 32129

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Cypress Creek Elementary School (4.6 miles):

84
Sugar Mill Elementary School:

77
Tomoka Correctional Institution School (9.1 miles):

72
Port Orange Elementary School (0.7 miles):

67
Chisholm Elementary School (9.2 miles):

54
Pine Trail Elementary School (11.2 miles):

46
Friendship Elementary School (18.7 miles):

38
Indian River Elementary School (15.5 miles):

29
Sugar Mill Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Port Orange:

57
Sugar Mill Elementary School:

77

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (386) 756-7130 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 4621
School type: Elementary
District Name: VOLUSIA
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 756-7140
Principal: Janet Garzia
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 27
Senate District: 7

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

544
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 302 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

595
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 306 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 243
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 243
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

594
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 317

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 317
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 275
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 275
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1480
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1615
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

86%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1432
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1631
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

314
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1452
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

333
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1629
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

120
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

96
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
SUGAR MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

121
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 99
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

313
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

Back to: Port Orange, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.