Tampa Bay Academy School in Riverview, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

12012 BOYETTE ROAD
Riverview, FL 33569

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (14.0 miles):

92
James W. Sikes Elementary School (18.2 miles):

69
Wimauma Elementary School (10.0 miles):

54
Lewis Elementary School (14.2 miles):

43
Tba High School (11.5 miles):

35
Lockhart Elementary Magnet School (12.2 miles):

24
Thonotosassa Elementary School (12.7 miles):

14
Tampa Bay Academy School:

1
Falkenburg Academy School (8.1 miles):

0
Tampa Bay Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Riverview:

43
Tampa Bay Academy School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 677-6700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6602
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 677-5467
Principal: Bill Orris
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 56
Senate District: 10

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Math
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

30%
State average from 37 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 37 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

51%
State average from 37 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

39%
State average from 37 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 37 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 37 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 37 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

388
State average from 37 schools:

547
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 37 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 37 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 37 schools:

44%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

5%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 82
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1106
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

213
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1064
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

195
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

6
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1434
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1564
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

63%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

216
State average:

302
Percent Passing
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

14%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

86%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

241
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1190
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1182
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

196
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

19%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

259
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1702
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

63%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

14%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

29%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

990
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

219
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 02
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 06
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 05
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1406
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1335
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1522
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1595
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

824
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

190
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1178
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1411
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1506
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1342
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

192
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

234
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1168
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

192
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1643
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

27
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

18
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

622
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

11
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

24
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

10
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

3
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

11
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

7
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

181
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 13%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1050
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

203
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1034
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1065
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -31

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1071
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

196
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 45%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1043
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

860
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 182

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1426
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 33%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1274
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1092
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 182

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1418
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 65%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1320
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1529
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -209

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1420
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 36%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1546
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1403
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 143

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1345
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

193
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 33%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1023
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1463
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -440

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1135
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1172
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1053
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1118
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

181
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1178
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1178
State average:

1620

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1508
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 36%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1402
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1190
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 212

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1600
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1566
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1484
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1619
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 29%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1503
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

1450
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1577
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 44%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1454
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1649
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -195

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

597
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 13
Literary (max 18): 7
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 6
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

635
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 16
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

591
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 11
Number Sense (max 12): 4
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 17
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

648
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

653
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 23
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 14
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
TAMPA BAY ACADEMY:

186
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 11%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 17%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

212
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 18%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Riverview, FL
  5. Tampa Bay Academy School in Riverview, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.