Tampa Charter School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 24.

5429 BEAUMONT CTR BLVD STE 800
Tampa, FL 33634

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (18.2 miles):

98
Maniscalco Elementary School (10.9 miles):

74
Largo Central Elementary School (15.5 miles):

62
Foster Elementary School (6.8 miles):

53
Anona Elementary School (19.0 miles):

42
Heritage Elementary School (9.6 miles):

31
Tampa Charter School:

24
Hammond Elementary School (8.2 miles):

19
Mendez Exceptional Center School (7.0 miles):

0
Tampa Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Tampa Charter School:

24

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 887-3800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6620
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: UNKNOWN
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 885-9626
Principal: Sheila Thomley
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 58
Senate District: 12

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 5 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 5 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 5 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 5 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 5 schools:

60%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 5 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

522
State average from 5 schools:

504
Percent Tested
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 6 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 6 schools:

55%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 6 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 5 schools:

65%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 6 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 6 schools:

59%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 5 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 6 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 5 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

512
State average from 5 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 5 schools:

25%
Minority Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 6 schools:

36%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 5 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 6 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 5 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 5 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 5 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 5 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 5 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

516
State average from 5 schools:

529
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 5 schools:

30%
Minority Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 5 schools:

41%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 5 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

40%
State average from 5 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 5 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 5 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 5 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

470
State average from 5 schools:

525
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 5 schools:

33%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 5 schools:

35%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 5 schools:

65%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 5 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 5 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 5 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 5 schools:

77%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

376
State average from 5 schools:

422
Percent Tested
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 5 schools:

36%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 5 schools:

32%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 5 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 5 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 5 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 5 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 5 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

383
State average from 5 schools:

393
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: S

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 5 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 5 schools:

33%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1231
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

294
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

67%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

37%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1389
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1547
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

293
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

47%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1896
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

321
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1094
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1566
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1599
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1871
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1276
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1482
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1863
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1532
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1522
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1428
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1759
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

19
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

635
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

59
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

11
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

698
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

270
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

292
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1229
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1296
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1318
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1229
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1565
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1579
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1440
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 138

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1577
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1577
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1526
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 52

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1743
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1743
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1622
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1903
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

314
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1908
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1837
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1057
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1312
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1347
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1335
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 13

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1581
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1589
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1468
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1574
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1636
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1577
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

1714
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

287
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1714
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1570
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 143

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1844
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1859
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1799
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 60

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

610
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 52
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

674
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 24
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

598
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 38
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
TAMPA CHARTER SCHOOL:

676
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 24
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

211
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 21%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 14%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.