
Back to: Bradenton, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 8.
202  13TH AVE E
Bradenton, FL 34208
Other nearby schools ratings:
Team Success A Of Excellence School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Manatee County:  42  Bradenton:  45  Team Success A Of Excellence:  8 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Bradenton, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (941) 7147260 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 41
School number: 2102
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: MANATEE
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 7147333
Principal: Fred Spence
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 18
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  39%  State average from 79 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  38%  State average from 79 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  69%  State average from 79 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  11%  State average from 79 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  44%  State average from 79 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  51%  State average from 78 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  53%  State average from 79 schools:  61% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  57%  State average from 79 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  362  State average from 79 schools:  530 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 78 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: F
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  98%  State average from 80 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  93%  State average from 80 schools:  47% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 64
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 126
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  49%  State average from 74 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  48%  State average from 74 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  74%  State average from 74 schools:  87% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  28%  State average from 74 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  62%  State average from 74 schools:  69% 
Making Math GainsHere:  57%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  77%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  468  State average from 74 schools:  556 
Percent TestedTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  100%  State average from 74 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  93%  State average from 74 schools:  47% 
Minority RateHere:  91%  State average from 74 schools:  44% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 131
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 131
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 122
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 122
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  46%  State average from 73 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  43%  State average from 73 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  83%  State average from 73 schools:  81% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  43%  State average from 73 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  55%  State average from 73 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 73 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  65%  State average from 73 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 73 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  467  State average from 73 schools:  537 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 73 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  91%  State average from 72 schools:  45% 
Minority RateTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  87%  State average from 73 schools:  43% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 47
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  21%  State average from 66 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  17%  State average from 66 schools:  66% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 66 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  44%  State average from 66 schools:  48% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  57%  State average from 66 schools:  67% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  48%  State average from 66 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  60%  State average from 66 schools:  68% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  58%  State average from 66 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  387  State average from 66 schools:  534 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 66 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: P
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  60%  State average from 66 schools:  44% 
Minority RateHere:  88%  State average from 66 schools:  49% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  23%  State average from 62 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  14%  State average from 62 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 62 schools:  82% 
Making Reading GainsTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  40%  State average from 62 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  44%  State average from 62 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  47%  State average from 62 schools:  65% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  248  State average from 62 schools:  413 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 62 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  74%  State average from 62 schools:  44% 
Minority RateHere:  79%  State average from 62 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 44
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 127
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  15%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 126
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 22
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 60
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  7%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 58
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  14%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 37
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  18%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 38
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 95
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 94
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 41
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 42
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  20%  State average from 55 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  18%  State average from 55 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  57%  State average from 55 schools:  77% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  41%  State average from 55 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  56%  State average from 55 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  33%  State average from 55 schools:  62% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  225  State average from 55 schools:  395 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 55 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  65%  State average from 55 schools:  45% 
Minority RateHere:  86%  State average from 55 schools:  45% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1316  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  23%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  32% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1336  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  278  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  36%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  25%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  29% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1358  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  258  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  34%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  41%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  17%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  3%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  24%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  2  State average:  3 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1462  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  42%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  15%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  23%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  2  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1514  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  261  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  59%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  33% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  23%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1882  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  48%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  43%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  228  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  85%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  11%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  43%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  10%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  5%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  14%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1466  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  336  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  8%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  85%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1396  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  286  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  32%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  18%  State average:  26% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  46%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1460  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  45%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  27% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  21%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1452  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  54%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  38%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1528  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  241  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  73%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  14%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1820  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  301  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  29%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  5%  State average:  17% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  48%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  4  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1305  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1454  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1405  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1466  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1729  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1792  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  268  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1468  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1399  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1440  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1376  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  241  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1744  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1810  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  3  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 21%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 58%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 57%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 83%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1359  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1306  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1273  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  243  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1439  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  262  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1602  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  274  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  210  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1504  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  344  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1401  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1496  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  297  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1483  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  266  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1680  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1706  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  272  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  632  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  615  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Functional (max 18)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  10  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  634  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  10  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  646  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Literary (max 18)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  11  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  12  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  659  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Literary (max 18)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  12  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  8  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  7  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  5  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  16  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  225  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 25%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 25%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  235  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  952  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  243  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1053  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  229  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 1
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1060  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1084  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 25
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1364  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1362  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1212  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 150
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1354  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  247  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1380  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1253  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 127
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1645  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1629  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1450  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 179
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1638  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  258  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1698  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1491  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 207
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  223  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  247  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1220  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1092  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  217  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 63%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1114  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1034  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 80
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1418  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  280  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1411  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1348  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 63
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1373  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  240  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1369  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1308  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 61
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1647  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1632  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1439  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 193
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1693  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1705  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006TEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  1621  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 84
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  582  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 7
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  602  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 26
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale ScoreTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  638  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  663  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  667  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  590  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 33
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  593  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 27
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  631  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  639  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 35
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  661  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  687  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 20
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  179  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 5%
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedTEAM SUCCESS A SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE:  238  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 14%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 7
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 48%
