Technical Education Center Osceola School in Kissimmee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 48.

501 SIMPSON RD
Kissimmee, FL 34744

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (17.3 miles):

98
Nap Ford Community Charter School (17.5 miles):

64
Durrance Elementary School (10.7 miles):

55
Technical Education Center Osceola School:

48
Passport Charter School (16.0 miles):

46
St. Cloud High School (5.7 miles):

39
Pinar Elementary School (15.2 miles):

28
Little River Elementary School (18.0 miles):

19
Technical Education Center Osceola School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Osceola County:

33
Kissimmee:

33
This School:

48

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 344-5080 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 49
School number: 861
School type: Adult
District Name: OSCEOLA
Grade range: ADULT
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 344-5089
Principal: Tom Tunnels
The function/setting of the school: Area Vocational-Technical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 26

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

53%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

493
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 354 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 355 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 311
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

50%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

564
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 344

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 343
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

74%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

535
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

66%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 358 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 338
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 324

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 339
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 325
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1336
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1498
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1633
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1779
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2003
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

65%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

316
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

50%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1451
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

339
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

70%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1841
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1959
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

336
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

81%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1979
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

2034
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

90%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

82%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1357
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1571
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1639
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

315
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1992
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1999
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1432
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1588
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1851
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1995
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2030
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 53%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 486
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 435
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1402
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1797
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1908
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1988
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2026
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1594
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1743
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

1918
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1995
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

2021
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

127
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

634
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

118
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

646
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

110
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

69
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

524
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

67
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

529
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

458
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

693
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

70
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

453
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
TECHNICAL EDUCATION CENTER OSCEOLA:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

589
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

716
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 456
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

312
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 580
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

311
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Kissimmee, FL
  5. Technical Education Center Osceola School in Kissimmee, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.