The Quest Center School in Hollywood, Florida (FL)

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories

Find:
Near:

Back to: Hollywood, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.

City-data.com school rating (weighted overall 2010 test average compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 83.
6401 CHARLESTON ST
Hollywood, FL 33024

The Quest Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	48
Broward County:	50
Hollywood, FL:	44
The Quest Center School:	83

Other nearby schools ratings:

Imagine Charter At Weston School (14.5 miles):	98
The Quest Center School:	83
Springview Elementary School (16.0 miles):	79
Lillie C. Evans Elementary School (13.5 miles):	67
Allapattah Middle School (15.4 miles):	56
Pompano Multi-Purpose Education Center School (15.1 miles):	45
Hialeah Middle School (11.5 miles):	31
Westview Middle School (10.3 miles):	14

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

Recent posts about schools in Hollywood, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:

	PhD student coming to Davie/Fort Lauderdale (2 replies)
	Does anyone know much about Nova Southeastern University? Anything would be much helpful! Thanks! (13 replies)
	Single +1 in Hollywood??? (3 replies)
	Thoughts on the harbor area of Ft Lauderdale? (19 replies)
	My defense of Pompano Beach (78 replies)
	Neighborhoods near PT Everglades (6 replies)

Latest news about schools in Hollywood, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations

Phone: (754) 321-7500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 1021
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 321-7540
Principal: Raquel Cobb
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 20
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 99
Senate District: 31

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 59 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 59 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 59 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	61%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 59 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 59 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	599
State average from 59 schools:	560

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	52%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

THE QUEST CENTER:	65%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 642 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 589
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 569

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 590
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 570
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 337 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

THE QUEST CENTER:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

THE QUEST CENTER:	87%
State average from 58 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 58 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

THE QUEST CENTER:	95%
State average from 58 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	63%
State average from 58 schools:	50%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 58 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 58 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

THE QUEST CENTER:	637
State average from 58 schools:	564

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	47%
State average from 59 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 618 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 618 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

THE QUEST CENTER:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

THE QUEST CENTER:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 304 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	89%
State average from 59 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	90%
State average from 59 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 59 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	62%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 59 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	81%
State average from 59 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 59 schools:	60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	78%
State average from 59 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	634
State average from 59 schools:	541

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 59 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

THE QUEST CENTER:	42%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Minority Rate

Here:	63%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 539
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 539
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

THE QUEST CENTER:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13 (66%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11 (64%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13 (66%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11 (64%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1497
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

THE QUEST CENTER:	44%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

THE QUEST CENTER:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

THE QUEST CENTER:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1697
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

THE QUEST CENTER:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

THE QUEST CENTER:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1720
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1522
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	25%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

THE QUEST CENTER:	31%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

THE QUEST CENTER:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1690
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

THE QUEST CENTER:	294
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	37%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

THE QUEST CENTER:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

THE QUEST CENTER:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1787
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	30%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	42%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

THE QUEST CENTER:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	46%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	8%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

THE QUEST CENTER:	10%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

THE QUEST CENTER:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1576
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

THE QUEST CENTER:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

THE QUEST CENTER:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

THE QUEST CENTER:	355
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1755
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

THE QUEST CENTER:	1595
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	36%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

THE QUEST CENTER:	12%
State average:	18%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

THE QUEST CENTER:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1734
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	34%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1803
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

THE QUEST CENTER:	29%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

THE QUEST CENTER:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1437
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1670
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1723
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

THE QUEST CENTER:	323
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1559
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1717
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1741
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	252
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1578
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1678
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1775
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1534
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1748
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1753
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 202

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 80

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

THE QUEST CENTER:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1470
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1710
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1730
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1629
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

THE QUEST CENTER:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1647
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

THE QUEST CENTER:	1796
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	364
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

THE QUEST CENTER:	1690
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1785
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1612
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1747
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1823
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

THE QUEST CENTER:	202
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

THE QUEST CENTER:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	186
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	666
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	197
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

THE QUEST CENTER:	80
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

THE QUEST CENTER:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	64
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	661
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	65
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

THE QUEST CENTER:	50
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

THE QUEST CENTER:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

THE QUEST CENTER:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

THE QUEST CENTER:	69
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

THE QUEST CENTER:	672
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	49
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

THE QUEST CENTER:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

THE QUEST CENTER:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

THE QUEST CENTER:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 188

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

THE QUEST CENTER:	319
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	263
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%