Three Oaks Middle School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50.

18500 THREE OAKS PKWY
Fort Myers, FL 33967

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Pine Ridge Middle School (16.9 miles):

73
Diplomat Middle School (18.3 miles):

63
Fort Myers Middle Academy School (12.0 miles):

54
Three Oaks Middle School:

50
Excelsior Middle Academy Of Lee County School (13.1 miles):

50
Lehigh Acres Middle School (13.9 miles):

39
Lexington Middle School (7.6 miles):

25
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School (12.5 miles):

5
Three Oaks Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lee County:

49
Fort Myers:

44
Three Oaks Middle School:

50

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 267-5757 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 821
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 267-4007
Principal: Michael Carson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 75
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/okm

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

66%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

565
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 393
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 381
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

643
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 420 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 420 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

62%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

561
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 441 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 440 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 360 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 343

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 343
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

524
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 823 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 265
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 549 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 548 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 175
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

440
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 859 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 859 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 286
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 832
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 833
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 558 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 558 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 191

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 546
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 547
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 78
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 219
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 219
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 92
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 270
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 270
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

399
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

52%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1756
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1773
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1633
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

32%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1650
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

48%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1828
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1706
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1839
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

378
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1677
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1769
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1736
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

312
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 127
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 288
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1561
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1725
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1621
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1824
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1613
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1848
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

126
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

652
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

155
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

158
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

286
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

291
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

264
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 270
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

267
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1673
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

304
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1680
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1630
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1777
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1780
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1708
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1875
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1882
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1783
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 98

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1694
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

315
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1696
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1687
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1839
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1843
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1739
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 103

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1899
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1902
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1819
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 294
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 244
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 294
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 244
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 275
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THREE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

296
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Myers, FL
  5. Three Oaks Middle School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.