Timber Creek High School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 42.

1001 AVALON PARK RD
Orlando, FL 32828

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oviedo High School (11.0 miles):

83
Ae Lakeside School (12.7 miles):

66
Lyman High School (16.4 miles):

56
Winter Springs High School (13.8 miles):

47
Timber Creek High School:

42
La-Amistad School (14.5 miles):

34
Princeton House Charter School (16.2 miles):

21
Community Education Partners-Nw School (18.0 miles):

8
Timber Creek High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Timber Creek High School:

42

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (321) 235-7800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1631
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 235-7821
Principal: John Wright
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 33
Senate District: 24

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

73%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

497
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

500
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

488
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

512
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2088 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2088 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1011
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1974
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1971
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1109 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 537
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1076
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1075
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 638 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 637 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 300
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 571 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 569 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 281
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 526
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

394
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1960 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1960 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 896
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1877
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1876
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1057 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1061 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 483

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1030
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1030
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 106

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 196
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 197
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 575 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 570 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 253

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 535
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 533
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 547 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 541 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 233

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 520
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 515
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 67

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 170
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 108

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 221
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 220
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

386
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1188
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

2040
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2076
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

71%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1235
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1493
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

2031
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2055
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

326
Percent Passing
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

91%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1240
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

290
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1428
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

293
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1557
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1995
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

312
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1270
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1437
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

1562
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

1991
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

2022
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,096
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1222
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1537
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1985
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2027
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1298
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1464
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1607
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1985
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2032
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

76
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

64
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

69
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

658
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

710
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

77
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

266
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 37%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,016
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

314
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1983
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1992
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1904
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1973
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1994
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

1979
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 15

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

313
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1979
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1989
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1939
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2014
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

2024
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1983
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 41

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1007
Mean Scale Score
Here:

717
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1066
Mean Scale Score
TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL:

706
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1006
Mean Scale Score
Here:

726
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1066
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1062
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

309
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Timber Creek High School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.