City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
296 MIRROR LAKE DR N
St Petersburg, FL 33701
St Petersburg, FL 33701
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Ptec - St Petersburg School (2.4 miles): | 98 |
| Tomlinson Adult Learning Center School: | 72 |
| Ruskin Elementary School (13.6 miles): | 72 |
| Crestwood Elementary School (18.5 miles): | 58 |
| Cypress Creek Elementary School (17.1 miles): | 47 |
| Corr Elementary School (16.8 miles): | 37 |
| Starkey Elementary School (9.1 miles): | 28 |
| Potter Elementary School (19.9 miles): | 19 |
Tomlinson Adult Learning Center School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| St Petersburg: | 45 |
| Tomlinson Adult Learning Center: | 72 |
1
Colette PERON
Feb 21, 2012 @ 1:13 pm
are there english as a second language lessons on the beginning of next January? we are two french people comming for few months vacation next year? looking forward to your answering. Colette & Christian.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 2471
School type: Adult
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: ADULT
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 893-2782
Principal: Deborah F Vanderwoude
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 52
Senate District: 18
School Web Address: http://www.tomlinson.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 77% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 602 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 541 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 43% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1187 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1186 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 359
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1043
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1043
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 602 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 602 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 204
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 552
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 552
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 250 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 520 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 519 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 130
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 418
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 78% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 599 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 48% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 42% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 349
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 981
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 980
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 191
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 536
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 537
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 416 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 416 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 622 |
| State average from 131 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 32% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1133 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1133 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 365
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 978
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 974
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 624 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 624 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 582
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 580
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 84% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 42% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 63% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 555 |
| State average from 11 schools: | 516 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 50% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 11 schools: | 58% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 74% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 75% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 64% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 446 |
| State average from 10 schools: | 399 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 56% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 57% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 65% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 58% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 60% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 57% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 373 |
| State average from 10 schools: | 382 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 62% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 10 schools: | 56% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1406 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 76% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 17 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1620 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 36% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1678 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1814 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 14% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1901 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 23% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1935 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 59% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1567 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 93% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1571 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 74% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1705 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 341 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1902 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 73% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1965 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1292 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1634 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1733 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1805 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 328 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1870 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1961 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1367 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 315 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1607 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1790 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 337 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1908 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1984 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 379
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1416 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1640 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1633 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1854 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1912 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1510 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1593 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1637 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1826 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1954 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1999 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 56 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 635 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 63 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 60 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 75 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 67 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 666 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 370 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 693 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 80 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 369 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 706 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 386 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 708 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 81 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%| Here: | 298 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 387
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%| Here: | 350 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 19%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 21%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1459 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1518 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1547 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 173| Here: | 1374 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1557 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1551 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 54| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1498 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1405 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 323 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1543 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1562 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 196| Here: | 1366 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1601 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 319 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1608 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 134| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 1475 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 66
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 651 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 59| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 639 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 89
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 67| Here: | 661 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 66
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 640 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 648 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 89
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 67| Here: | 654 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%| TOMLINSON ADULT LEARNING CENTER: | 287 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 70%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.