Triad School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

4405 SAWYER RD
Sarasota, FL 34233

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (4.3 miles):

92
Riverview High School (1.8 miles):

72
Braden River Middle School (10.1 miles):

57
Oasis Middle School (14.3 miles):

43
Manatee For The Arts School (16.0 miles):

36
Cyesis School (0.5 miles):

27
Just For Girls School (16.9 miles):

6
Triad School:

6
Oak Park School (4.1 miles):

0
Triad School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Sarasota County:

48
Sarasota:

43
Triad School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 361-6752 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 294
School type: Senior High
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 361-6869
Principal: Steve Hazuda
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 69
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.sarasota-ymca.org

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (84%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TRIAD:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (90%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TRIAD:

310
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
TRIAD:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

38%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRIAD:

38%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TRIAD:

6%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
TRIAD:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TRIAD:

38%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TRIAD:

18%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
TRIAD:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRIAD:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TRIAD:

15%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
TRIAD:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TRIAD:

18%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2011
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

88%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1779
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRIAD:

1584
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TRIAD:

265
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
TRIAD:

6
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
TRIAD:

639
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

29
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
TRIAD:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
TRIAD:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
TRIAD:

11
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
TRIAD:

657
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
TRIAD:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

31
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
TRIAD:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
TRIAD:

35
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
TRIAD:

36
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
TRIAD:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TRIAD:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
TRIAD:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
TRIAD:

237
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 44%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1574
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1561
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1657
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -96

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1696
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TRIAD:

270
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1678
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1642
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 36

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1849
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1812
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1769
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1671
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TRIAD:

263
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1650
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1545
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 105

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1774
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1797
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1749
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1939
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1955
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1905
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

633
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 16
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale Score
TRIAD:

666
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 24
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 35
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

222
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 60%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 27
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

257
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 63%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Sarasota, FL
  5. Triad School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.