|
Back to: Tuba City, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 32.
Address: Maple Street
Tuba City, WI 86045
Grade span: K-3
Schedule: 07:30 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Lee Tsinigine
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 283-1062
Fax: (928) 283-1114
Homepage: www.tcusd.org
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 93.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 339
Enrollment In 2003: 362
Enrollment In 2004: 339
Enrollment In 2005: 451
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 98.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 82.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 84.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 30.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 20.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 27.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 18.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 32.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 19.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 32.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 19.00
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 107
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 50
Female Percent Tested: 96%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 57
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 34.14% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 31.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 94
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 49.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 45.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 98
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 47.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 2.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 15.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 49
Female Percent Tested: 94%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 57
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 407 schools: | 29.90% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 428 schools: | 28.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 93
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 96%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
|