|
Back to: Wilmington, VT, Vermont, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Vermont forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2007 test average as compared to other schools in Vermont) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.
ONE SCHOOL STREET
Wilmington, VT 5363
County: WINDHAM
Grade span: 6th Grade - 8th Grade
Phone: (802) 464-5255 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Enrollment in Twin Valley Middle School
2005 Student Enrollment: 138
6th Grade Enrollment : 49
7th Grade Enrollment : 44
8th Grade Enrollment : 45
Female Enrollment : 70
Male Enrollment : 68
White Enrollment : 132
Hispanic Enrollment : 6
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 28
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 19
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 47
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 10
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 13.8
Genders in Twin Valley Middle School
Grades in Twin Valley Middle School
Races in Twin Valley Middle School
2004 Student Enrollment: 132
6th Grade Enrollment : 47
7th Grade Enrollment : 40
8th Grade Enrollment : 45
Female Enrollment : 68
Male Enrollment : 64
White Enrollment : 130
Hispanic Enrollment : 2
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 8.6
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 15.3
Attendance Rate in Twin Valley Middle School
2006 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 94.4% | This school: | 94.4% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.4% |
Special education (%): 13.8% | Here: | 13.8% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.4% |
2005 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 94.0% | Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 233 schools: | 95.2% |
2006 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 13.80
Other teachers : 1.22
Instructional aides : 5
Licensed administrators : .61
Administrative support : 1.01
Other staff : 3.45
Average teacher salary ($): 45,627$ | Here: | 45,627$ | | State average from 234 schools: | 44,460$ |
2005 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 15.30
Other teachers : 1.26
Instructional aides : 8
Other staff : .60
Average teacher salary ($): 38,530$ | Here: | 38,530$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 42,814$ |
Risk Factor Statistics:
Poverty rate (%), July 2006: 8.1% | Here: | 8.1% | | State average from 231 schools: | 10.6% |
Poverty rate town rank, July 2006: 181.0% | This school: | 181.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 100.0% |
2007 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 69.1% | Here: | 69.1% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 7.0% | Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.1% |
Percent staff services: 2.5% | Here: | 2.5% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 9.3% | Here: | 9.3% | | State average from 233 schools: | 8.8% |
Percent operation: 12.0% | Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 233 schools: | 19.5% |
Financial Expenditures - Twin Valley Middle School
Financial Expenditures - Vermont
Total PK-12 current expense ($): 4,284,784$ | Here: | 4,284,784$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,286,407$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 11,721$ | Twin Valley Middle School: | 11,721$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,797$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 4,437,016$ | Here: | 4,437,016$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 7,256,725$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 398,922$ | Here: | 398,922$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 1,769,547$ |
2006 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 69.3% | Here: | 69.3% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.4% |
Percent student services: 6.9% | This school: | 6.9% | | State average from 232 schools: | 6.0% |
Percent staff services: 2.3% | Here: | 2.3% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 8.6% | Here: | 8.6% | | State average from 233 schools: | 9.0% |
Percent operation: 12.9% | This school: | 12.9% | | State average from 233 schools: | 18.3% |
Financial Expenditures - Twin Valley Middle School
Financial Expenditures - Vermont
Total PK-12 current expense ($): 4,267,700$ | This school: | 4,267,700$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,034,752$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 33,586$ | Here: | 33,586$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,289$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 4,441,386$ | Twin Valley Middle School: | 4,441,386$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,992,659$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 378,055$ | Here: | 378,055$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 1,629,679$ |
NECAP Results in Twin Valley Middle School
2007 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Math Results - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Math Results - Vermont
Students tested : 63
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.24 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Vermont
Female Students tested : 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.52 | Here: | 0.52 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Vermont
Male Students tested : 32
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.13 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.34 | Here: | 0.34 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | This school: | 0.13 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Vermont
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 21
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | This school: | 0.05 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.43 | Here: | 0.43 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.28 |
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 42
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.21 | This school: | 0.21 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.47 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.24 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.13 |
2007 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Reading Results - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Reading Results - Vermont
Students tested : 63
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.54 | This school: | 0.54 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | This school: | 0.21 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.11 |
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Vermont
Female Students tested : 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | This school: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.65 | Here: | 0.65 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.08 |
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Vermont
Male Students tested : 32
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.12 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.44 | This school: | 0.44 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.14 |
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Vermont
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 21
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.14 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.52 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.52 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | This school: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.14 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 42
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.08 |
2007 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP writing Results - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP writing Results - Vermont
Students tested : 40
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.03 | Here: | 0.03 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.35 | Here: | 0.35 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.21 |
NECAP writing Results (Female) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP writing Results (Female) - Vermont
Female Students tested : 19
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.58 | Here: | 0.58 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.13 |
NECAP writing Results (Male) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP writing Results (Male) - Vermont
Male Students tested : 21
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.52 | Here: | 0.52 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.38 | This school: | 0.38 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.29 |
NECAP writing Results (FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP writing Results (FRL) - Vermont
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 11
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - Twin Valley Middle School
NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 29
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.03 | Here: | 0.03 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.31 | Here: | 0.31 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.10 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.16 |
2006 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 82
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.21 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.21 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.44 | This school: | 0.44 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.18 |
Female Students tested : 41
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | This school: | 0.20 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.51 | Here: | 0.51 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | This school: | 0.17 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.12 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Male Students tested : 41
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.37 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.37 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.17 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 23
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.56 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.28 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 59
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.29 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.29 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.39 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.39 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.17 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.13 |
2006 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 82
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.15 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.51 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.51 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.11 |
Female Students tested : 41
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.41 | This school: | 0.41 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.29 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | This school: | 0.05 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 41
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.11 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.61 | Here: | 0.61 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.29 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.14 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 23
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56 | This school: | 0.56 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.35 | This school: | 0.35 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.27 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.19 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 59
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.49 | This school: | 0.49 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.27 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
2006 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 42
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.38 | Here: | 0.38 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.35 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.23 |
Female Students tested : 21
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.43 | Here: | 0.43 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.38 | Here: | 0.38 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.15 |
Male Students tested : 21
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 14
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.43 | Here: | 0.43 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.36 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.31 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.36 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 28
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.11 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.11 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.18 |
2005 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 83
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.42 | Here: | 0.42 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.23 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.23 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Female Students tested : 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Male Students tested : 43
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.37 | Here: | 0.37 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.21 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.21 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 32
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06 | This school: | 0.06 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.31 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.31 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 51
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.41 | This school: | 0.41 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.28 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.14 |
2005 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 83
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | This school: | 0.16 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.29 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.24 |
Female Students tested : 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.20 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.57 | This school: | 0.57 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | This school: | 0.23 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Male Students tested : 43
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.12 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.12 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.10 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.54 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.54 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.51 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.35 | Here: | 0.35 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.26 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 32
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06 | This school: | 0.06 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.06 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.50 | Here: | 0.50 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.32 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 51
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.59 | Here: | 0.59 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.21 |
2005 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 40
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.70 | Here: | 0.70 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | This school: | 0.20 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.03 | This school: | 0.03 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.14 |
Female Students tested : 21
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | This school: | 0.10 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.71 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.71 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.50 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.29 |
Male Students tested : 19
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.05 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.05 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.68 | This school: | 0.68 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.36 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Twin Valley Middle School: | 0.05 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.20 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 16
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.04 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56 | Here: | 0.56 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.31 | Here: | 0.31 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.41 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.22 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 24
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.79 | Here: | 0.79 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.32 |
|