|
Back to: Tolleson, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.
Address: 3834 S. 91st Ave.
Tolleson, WI 85353
Grade span: 5-8
Schedule: 08:00 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Justin Greene
Phone (verify before calling): (623) 478-5000
Fax: (623) 478-5026
Homepage: www.uesd.org
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| This school: |  1.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 2
Enrollment In 2002: 204
Enrollment In 2003: 372
Enrollment In 2004: 471
Enrollment In 2005: 439
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 12.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: .00
Teacher Count In 2005: 15.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: .00
Teacher Count In 2006: 18.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 2.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 18.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 3.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: No
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 30
All Students Percent Tested: 115%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 24.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 114%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 9.74% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 117%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Hispanic Tested: 12
Hispanic Percent Tested: 92%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 445 schools: | 16.43% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 22.17% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 54.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 104%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 30
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 24.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 6.51% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 616 schools: | 13.35% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 57.67% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 18.64% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 13.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Grade 3: | 8.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 24.07% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 49
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 26
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 37.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Hispanic Tested: 30
Hispanic Percent Tested: 88%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 28.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 19.65% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 21.61% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 47.17% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 15.87% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 47
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 8.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 13.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 48.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 31.38% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 29
All Students Percent Tested: 112%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
Female Tested: 15
Female Percent Tested: 107%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 585 schools: | 10.75% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 117%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 11.85% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Hispanic Tested: 13
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 32.26% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 104%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 29
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 24.0% | | State average from 513 schools: | 7.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 21.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 639 schools: | 37.42% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 49
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 40.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 26
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 8.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Hispanic Tested: 30
Hispanic Percent Tested: 88%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 549 schools: | 19.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 30.00% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 629 schools: | 32.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 47
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 9.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 732 schools: | 33.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 39.34% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 132%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 123%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Hispanic Tested: 14
Hispanic Percent Tested: 140%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 29.73% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 602 schools: | 30.28% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 139%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 44
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Hispanic Tested: 28
Hispanic Percent Tested: 85%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 50.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 38.83% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 4.0% | | State average from 630 schools: | 26.73% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 30.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 37
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 44
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 17.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 738 schools: | 20.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 46.59% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 17.72% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 12.47% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 6.70% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 62
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 32
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 29
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 29.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Hispanic Tested: 29
Hispanic Percent Tested: 97%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 17.19% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 32.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 48.42% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 5.37% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 694 schools: | 67.43% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 56
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 14
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 345 schools: | 41.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 33.27% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 36
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 71%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 29.0% | | State average from 537 schools: | 6.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 15.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 66.20% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 25.38% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 130
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 65
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 65
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 81
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 47.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
White Tested: 12
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 482 schools: | 5.24% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 691 schools: | 67.15% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 64.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 25.78% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 54.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 119
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 96
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 34
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 720 schools: | 11.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 132%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 123%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Hispanic Tested: 14
Hispanic Percent Tested: 140%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 47.13% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 532 schools: | 12.12% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 580 schools: | 24.38% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 139%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 612 schools: | 44.25% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 44
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 47.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Hispanic Tested: 28
Hispanic Percent Tested: 85%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 577 schools: | 20.88% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 48.88% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 12.61% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 19.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 37
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 49.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 44
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 9.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 756 schools: | 33.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 716 schools: | 15.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 43.81% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 63
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 41.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
Female Tested: 31
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Male Tested: 31
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 32.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Hispanic Tested: 30
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 20.32% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 25.58% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 45.55% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 568 schools: | 7.62% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 12.76% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 51.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 55
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 28.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 14
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 27.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 30.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 37.83% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 37
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 73%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 8.34% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.21% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 50.40% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 130
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
Female Tested: 65
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Male Tested: 65
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 32.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Hispanic Tested: 81
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
White Tested: 12
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 6.97% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 13.14% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 52.41% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 428 schools: | 42.74% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 434 schools: | 27.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 119
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 96
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 39.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 34
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 28
All Students Percent Tested: 108%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 25.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 107%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 21.97% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 42.48% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 20.48% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 37.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 117%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 28
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 19.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 19.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 43.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 424 schools: | 14.85% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 21.13% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 15.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 415 schools: | 15.36% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Grade 8: | 4.0% | | State average from 332 schools: | 17.57% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 51
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 14.84% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Male Tested: 30
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 447 schools: | 35.90% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 18.14% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 32.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 14.47% |
Hispanic Tested: 34
Hispanic Percent Tested: 92%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.46% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 20.83% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 27.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 46
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 16.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 51
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 430 schools: | 23.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 17.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 39.57% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 20.34% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 52
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 11.41% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Female Tested: 22
Female Percent Tested: 96%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 61.28% |
Male Tested: 30
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 14.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 26.68% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 53.89% |
Hispanic Tested: 34
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 34.52% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 46.21% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 46
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 58.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 16
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 208 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 204 schools: | 28.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 35
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 90%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 64.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 6.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 18.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 66.24% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 8.84% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 54.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 23.75% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 17.49% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 4.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 7.90% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 205 schools: | 28.69% |
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 17.95% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 129
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 57
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 72
Male Percent Tested: 99%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 77
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 85
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 34.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 44
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 5.34% |
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 1.0% | | State average from 309 schools: | 5.13% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 204 schools: | 2.28% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 5.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 28
All Students Percent Tested: 108%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 107%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 38.00% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 42.77% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 90.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 39.95% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 117%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 41.83% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 28
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 32.42% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 43.28% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 51
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 76.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 376 schools: | 11.29% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 441 schools: | 36.01% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 26.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 38.49% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 311 schools: | 10.79% |
Male Tested: 30
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 81.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 39.01% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 446 schools: | 34.82% |
Hispanic Tested: 34
Hispanic Percent Tested: 92%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 51.67% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 34.80% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 225 schools: | 5.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 46
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 76.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 372 schools: | 12.21% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 51
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 76.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 27.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 434 schools: | 38.55% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 15.11% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 52
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 35.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
Female Tested: 22
Female Percent Tested: 96%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 20.03% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 23.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 19.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 49.54% |
Male Tested: 30
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 44.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 23.40% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 46.44% |
Hispanic Tested: 34
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 31.69% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 22.76% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 40.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 46
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 16
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 218 schools: | 44.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 217 schools: | 24.55% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 216 schools: | 28.37% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 35
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 90%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 13.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 15.05% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 53.96% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 128
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 13.02% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 2.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 12.71% |
Male Tested: 72
Male Percent Tested: 99%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Hispanic Tested: 76
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 381 schools: | 30.82% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 390 schools: | 23.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 40.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 14.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 84
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 44.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 30.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 23.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 40.55% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 44
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 18.69% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 130
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 5.13% |
Female Tested: 59
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 9.26% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 6.81% |
Male Tested: 71
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 4.85% |
Hispanic Tested: 73
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 17.34% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 34.44% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 561 schools: | 47.82% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 6.01% |
White Tested: 16
White Percent Tested: 94%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 289 schools: | 2.76% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 583 schools: | 15.17% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 73.68% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 123
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 6: | 37.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 5.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 41.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 33
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 6.14% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 17.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 70.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 8.00% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 130
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 24.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Female Tested: 59
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 17.01% |
Male Tested: 71
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 30.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 641 schools: | 16.97% |
Hispanic Tested: 73
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 27.11% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 554 schools: | 24.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 558 schools: | 41.42% |
White Tested: 16
White Percent Tested: 94%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 9.54% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 581 schools: | 14.05% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 52.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 123
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 33
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 11.16% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 14.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 50.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 24.65% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 121
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 69
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Hispanic Tested: 75
Hispanic Percent Tested: 99%
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 47.97% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 310 schools: | 4.44% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 16.03% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 68.50% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 109
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 86
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 35
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 7.67% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 378 schools: | 9.27% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 15.90% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 43.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 34.21% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 8.38% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 34.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 120
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 23.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 15.45% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Male Tested: 68
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 15.81% |
Hispanic Tested: 75
Hispanic Percent Tested: 99%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 383 schools: | 22.46% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 22.81% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 48.14% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 7.37% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 358 schools: | 7.25% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 11.96% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 57.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 109
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 16.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 86
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 408 schools: | 23.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.75% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 339 schools: | 6.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 34
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 38.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 7: | 3.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 22.49% |
|
