|
Back to: Willcox, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.
Address: 501 W Delos Street
Willcox, WI 85643
Schedule: 07:30 AM to 08:00 PM
Principal: Mr. D. Eldon Merrell
Phone (verify before calling): (520) 384-4216
Fax: (623) 384-5217
Homepage: willcox.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 94.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 1
Enrollment In 2002: 373
Enrollment In 2003: 394
Enrollment In 2004: 420
Enrollment In 2005: 398
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| This school: | 99.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 92.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 85.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 25.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 26.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 26.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 17.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 27.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 19.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 26.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 19.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 97
All Students Percent Tested: 102%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 9.74% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 51
Male Percent Tested: 104%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Hispanic Tested: 59
Hispanic Percent Tested: 105%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 22.17% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 54.52% |
White Tested: 37
White Percent Tested: 97%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 5.25% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 12.00% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 667 schools: | 57.90% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 239 schools: | 50.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 102%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 18.64% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 13.30% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 26.82% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 82
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 36
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 46
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Hispanic Tested: 52
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 19.65% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 21.61% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 47.17% |
White Tested: 29
White Percent Tested: 97%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 15.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 8.02% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 634 schools: | 12.77% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 73
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 43
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 68
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 8.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 13.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 48.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 31.38% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 753 schools: | 21.15% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 658 schools: | 31.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 97
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 11.29% |
Female Tested: 48
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 9.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 13.46% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 11.07% |
Hispanic Tested: 44
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 35.33% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 43.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 46.29% |
White Tested: 51
White Percent Tested: 98%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 4.91% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 15.57% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 76.0% | | State average from 699 schools: | 63.61% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 623 schools: | 17.74% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 29.12% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 37.29% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 31.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 34.64% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 83
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 12.34% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 34
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.06% |
Limited English Proficient Students Exceeds Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 109 schools: | 3.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 71
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 10.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 5.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 5.76% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 12.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 16.32% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 63.01% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 17.84% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 9.81% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 16.16% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 22.22% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 88
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 26.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 50
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 56
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 15.70% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 31.93% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 49.26% |
White Tested: 31
White Percent Tested: 97%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 14.66% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 81.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 63.77% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 648 schools: | 18.65% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 15
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 94%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 34.14% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 31.88% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 33.95% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 73
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 66.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 64
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 591 schools: | 6.46% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 770 schools: | 16.24% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 62.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 17.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 5.32% |
Students With Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students With Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 176 schools: | 10.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 98
All Students Percent Tested: 103%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 40.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 30.99% |
Male Tested: 52
Male Percent Tested: 106%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 7.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 11.85% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 30.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 59
Hispanic Percent Tested: 105%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 32.26% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.53% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 22.53% |
White Tested: 38
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 474 schools: | 5.63% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 654 schools: | 19.42% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 37.75% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 658 schools: | 38.97% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 179 schools: | 35.18% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 248 schools: | 39.96% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 224 schools: | 37.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 87
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 104%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 83
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 37
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Male Tested: 46
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 30.71% |
Hispanic Tested: 53
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 549 schools: | 19.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 30.00% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 629 schools: | 32.65% |
White Tested: 29
White Percent Tested: 97%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 8.57% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 18.37% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 34.60% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 39.68% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 74
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 43
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 69
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 9.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 732 schools: | 33.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 39.34% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 97
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 48
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 11.33% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 22.06% |
Hispanic Tested: 44
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 15.81% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 25.51% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 50.52% |
White Tested: 51
White Percent Tested: 98%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 6.34% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 11.45% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 698 schools: | 52.82% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 31.27% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 469 schools: | 28.05% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 474 schools: | 35.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 83
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 34
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 30.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 44.63% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 71
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 6.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 12.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 762 schools: | 52.33% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 27.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 31.11% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 89
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 51
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 56
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 15.23% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 24.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 52.65% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 9.55% |
White Tested: 32
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 11.25% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 66.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 55.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 29.35% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 16
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 407 schools: | 29.90% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 428 schools: | 28.98% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 35.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 73
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 65
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 7.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 757 schools: | 12.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 54.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 28.11% |
|