William T. Dwyer High School in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 35.

13601 N MILITARY TRL
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Alexander W Dreyfoos Junior Of The Arts School (11.9 miles):

98
Suncoast Community High School (6.8 miles):

70
Seminole Ridge Community High School (15.2 miles):

62
Lake Worth High School (18.3 miles):

47
Gold Coast Community School (12.1 miles):

39
William T. Dwyer High School:

35
Palm Beach Lakes High School (8.5 miles):

21
South Area Secondary Intensive Transition Program School (19.6 miles):

3
William T. Dwyer High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Palm Beach Gardens:

45
William T. Dwyer High School:

35

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA






Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 625-7800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2201
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 625-7870
Magnet Program.
Principal: Joseph J Lee
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 83
Senate District: 25
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/William_T_Dwyer_High_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

513
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 508
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1032

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1030
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 540 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 539 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 246
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 529
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 447

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 527
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 434 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 159
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 411
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 390
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 177
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

47%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

499
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 980 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 979 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 419
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 932
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 841

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 930
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 839
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 496 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 495 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 208
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 475
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 405

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 405
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 355 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 354 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 332
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 319
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

550
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 837 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 835 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 405
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 802
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 735

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 805
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 405 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 343

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 342
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 302

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

65%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

15%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

470
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 250 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

28%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

73%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

321
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 76
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 258
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 259
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 70

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 248
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 249
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

33%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

72%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

47%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

327
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1254
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

292
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1398
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

1939
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

61%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1337
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1457
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

1952
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

2036
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

88%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1252
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1452
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

1470
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1456
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

1977
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

2025
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

333
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 432
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1286
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1421
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1484
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1980
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1334
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1357
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2045
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

73
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

69
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

73
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

413
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

400
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

718
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

264
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 411
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1119
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1441
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1450
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1276
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 174

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1523
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1519
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

1491
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 29

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
WILLIAM T. DWYER HIGH SCHOOL:

273
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1175
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1430
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1432
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1190
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 242

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1576
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1568
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1358
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 210

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96
Mean Scale Score
Here:

602
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 77
Mean Scale Score
Here:

634
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

594
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 37
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 77
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

258
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 31%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 60%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 32%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.