
Back to: Orlando, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 61.
14360 WYNDHAM LAKES BLVD
Orlando, FL 32824
Other nearby schools ratings:
Wyndham Lakes Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Orange County:  44  Orlando:  42  Wyndham Lakes Elementary School:  61 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Orlando, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (407) 2512347 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1741
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 2512376
Principal: Bonnie Glester
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  96%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  92%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  81%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  66%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  79%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  76%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  676  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  16%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  33%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 472 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 443
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 315
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 79
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 49
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  96%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  94%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  89%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  74%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  81%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  75%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  671  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  29%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 455 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 455 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 447
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 425
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 447
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 423
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 332 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 332 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 313
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 44
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  98%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  97%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  88%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  81%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  88%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  76%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  672  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  10%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  26%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 466 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 134
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 446
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 456
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 444
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 344 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 342
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 333
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 331
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  68%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  61%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  24%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  69%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  52%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  53%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  48%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  461  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: NO
Grade in 2007: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  72%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  89%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 462 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 463 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 142
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 416
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 339 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1740  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  372  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  15%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  45%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  93%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1843  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  364  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  19%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  37%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  35%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  91%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1929  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  360  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  19%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  46%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  92%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1802  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  38%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  39%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  18%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  7% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  23%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1779  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  31%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  58%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  11%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  19%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  368  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  47%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  88%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  50%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  16%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  18%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1749  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  397  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  14%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  51%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  95%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1745  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  366  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  28%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  89%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1851  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  372  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  88%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1901  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  18%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  15%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  52%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1931  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  68%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  29%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  49%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1626  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  354  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1796  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1873  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  350  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1796  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1800  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  360  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1713  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  389  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 48%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1783  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  375  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1843  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  370  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1875  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1929  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 163
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 92%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 533
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 76%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1674  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  362  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 98%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1801  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  357  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1884  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1791  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1812  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  360  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1757  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  399  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 49%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1789  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  376  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1889  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  380  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1869  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  286  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1937  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  312  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  152  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  665  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Informational (max 18)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  681  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  182  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  697  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  17  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  600  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  682  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  500  State average:  237 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  704  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Informational (max 18)WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  359  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 87%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 10
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 522
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  290  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 80%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1265  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1453  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1476  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1345  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 131
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1527  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1547  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1501  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 46
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  272  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1311  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1468  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1486  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1364  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 122
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1545  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1566  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1504  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 62
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 140
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  626  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161
Mean Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  635  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  663  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 140
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  612  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 52
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161
Mean Scale ScoreWYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  640  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  645  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 155
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  292  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 77%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 65%
