Phone: (305) 571-1111 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7056
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 571-1112
Magnet School.
Principal: Leonard J Ruan
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: http://ympa.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 36% |
State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 34% |
State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 54% |
State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 84% |
State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 60% |
State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 512 |
State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 96% |
State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientYOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 82% |
State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 33% |
State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 65% |
State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 88% |
State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathYOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 93% |
State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 575 |
State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 69% |
State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority RateHere: | 90% |
State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1952 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 45% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 13% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 39% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreYOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 2031 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingYOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 73% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 41% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1962 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 69% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7YOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2067 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500YOUNG MEN'S PREPARATORY ACADEMY: | 343 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 95% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 48% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2015 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2045 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Young Men's Preparatory Academy School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: