Top 101 cities with largest percentage of males in occupations: Law enforcement workers including supervisors (population 50,000+)

Males (%) distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with largest percentage of males in occupations: Law enforcement workers including supervisors (population 50,000+)

RankCityMales (%)
1.
Warner Robins, GA (housing) (pop. 72,531)7.9%
2.
Eastvale, CA (housing) (pop. 55,191)7.6%
3.
Buckeye, AZ (housing) (pop. 56,683)7.0%
4.
Yuma, AZ (housing) (pop. 91,923)6.7%
5.
Hanford, CA (housing) (pop. 54,686)6.2%
6.
Edinburg, TX (housing) (pop. 80,836)5.5%
7.
Tulare, CA (housing) (pop. 61,170)5.2%
8.
San Angelo, TX (housing) (pop. 97,492)5.2%
9.
Levittown, NY (housing) (pop. 51,881)5.1%
10.
Staten Island, NY (housing) (pop. 481,026)5.1%
11.
Gary, IN (housing) (pop. 78,450)5.0%
12.
Elk Grove, CA (housing) (pop. 161,007)5.0%
13.
Lawton, OK (housing) (pop. 97,151)4.8%
14.
League City, TX (housing) (pop. 90,983)4.8%
15.
Casa Grande, AZ (housing) (pop. 50,111)4.6%
16.
Porterville, CA (housing) (pop. 55,174)4.6%
17.
Yonkers, NY (housing) (pop. 199,766)4.6%
18.
Vineland, NJ (housing) (pop. 61,050)4.5%
19.
Surprise, AZ (housing) (pop. 123,546)4.5%
20.
Las Cruces, NM (housing) (pop. 101,324)4.5%
21.
Laredo, TX (housing) (pop. 248,142)4.4%
22.
Springfield, IL (housing) (pop. 117,006)4.4%
23.
Goodyear, AZ (housing) (pop. 72,864)4.4%
24.
Melbourne, FL (housing) (pop. 77,508)4.2%
25.
Atascocita, TX (housing) (pop. 65,844)4.2%
26.
Bowie, MD (housing) (pop. 56,759)4.1%
27.
Delano, CA (housing) (pop. 52,403)4.1%
28.
Waldorf, MD (housing) (pop. 67,752)4.0%
29.
El Paso, TX (housing) (pop. 674,433)4.0%
30.
Cranston, RI (housing) (pop. 80,566)3.9%
31.
Whittier, CA (housing) (pop. 86,635)3.8%
32.
Pharr, TX (housing) (pop. 73,790)3.8%
33.
Lake Havasu City, AZ (housing) (pop. 52,844)3.8%
34.
Bryan, TX (housing) (pop. 78,709)3.7%
35.
Toms River, NJ (housing) (pop. 88,791)3.7%
36.
Vacaville, CA (housing) (pop. 94,275)3.7%
37.
Montgomery, AL (housing) (pop. 201,332)3.6%
38.
Warwick, RI (housing) (pop. 81,971)3.6%
39.
Pflugerville, TX (housing) (pop. 53,752)3.6%
40.
Yucaipa, CA (housing) (pop. 52,536)3.6%
41.
Bartlett, TN (housing) (pop. 58,226)3.6%
42.
McAllen, TX (housing) (pop. 136,639)3.5%
43.
Deltona, FL (housing) (pop. 86,290)3.5%
44.
Amarillo, TX (housing) (pop. 196,429)3.4%
45.
East Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 78,216)3.4%
46.
Coral Springs, FL (housing) (pop. 126,604)3.4%
47.
Abilene, TX (housing) (pop. 120,099)3.4%
48.
Victorville, CA (housing) (pop. 121,096)3.4%
49.
Newhall, CA (housing) (pop. 192,980)3.4%
50.
Lodi, CA (housing) (pop. 63,338)3.3%
51.
Dundalk, MD (housing) (pop. 63,597)3.3%
52.
O'Fallon, MO (housing) (pop. 82,809)3.3%
53.
Arivaca, AZ (housing) (pop. 59,243)3.3%
54.
Lauderhill, FL (housing) (pop. 69,813)3.3%
55.
Clarkstown, NY (housing) (pop. 84,187)3.3%
56.
South Hill, WA (housing) (pop. 52,431)3.3%
57.
Killeen, TX (housing) (pop. 137,147)3.3%
58.
Ocala, FL (housing) (pop. 57,468)3.3%
59.
Valdosta, GA (housing) (pop. 56,481)3.2%
60.
Miramar, FL (housing) (pop. 130,288)3.2%
61.
North Pinal, AZ (housing) (pop. 100,105)3.2%
62.
Utica, NY (housing) (pop. 61,808)3.2%
63.
Youngstown, OH (housing) (pop. 65,184)3.2%
64.
Pembroke Pines, FL (housing) (pop. 162,329)3.2%
65.
Visalia, CA (housing) (pop. 127,763)3.2%
66.
Pueblo, CO (housing) (pop. 108,249)3.1%
67.
Clarksville, TN (housing) (pop. 142,357)3.1%
68.
Temple, TX (housing) (pop. 70,190)3.1%
69.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA (housing) (pop. 171,386)3.1%
70.
Port Charlotte, FL (housing) (pop. 54,392)3.0%
71.
Moore, OK (housing) (pop. 58,414)3.0%
72.
Chula Vista, CA (housing) (pop. 256,780)3.0%
73.
Georgetown, TX (housing) (pop. 54,898)3.0%
74.
Framingham, MA (housing) (pop. 68,318)3.0%
75.
Wichita Falls, TX (housing) (pop. 104,898)3.0%
76.
Jackson, TN (housing) (pop. 67,685)3.0%
77.
Noblesville, IN (housing) (pop. 56,540)3.0%
78.
Jacksonville, NC (housing) (pop. 69,079)3.0%
79.
Cheektowaga, NY (housing) (pop. 75,178)3.0%
80.
Mesquite, TX (housing) (pop. 143,484)3.0%
81.
Santa Clarita, CA (housing) (pop. 179,590)3.0%
82.
Blue Springs, MO (housing) (pop. 53,294)2.9%
83.
Sterling Heights, MI (housing) (pop. 131,224)2.9%
84.
North Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 153,969)2.9%
85.
East Orange, NJ (housing) (pop. 64,544)2.9%
86.
West Haven, CT (housing) (pop. 55,046)2.8%
87.
Harlingen, TX (housing) (pop. 65,665)2.8%
88.
Rocky Mount, NC (housing) (pop. 56,954)2.8%
89.
Dutch Fork, SC (housing) (pop. 66,450)2.8%
90.
Clovis, CA (housing) (pop. 99,769)2.8%
91.
Rocklin, CA (housing) (pop. 59,738)2.8%
92.
Albany, NY (housing) (pop. 98,424)2.8%
93.
Taunton, MA (housing) (pop. 56,069)2.8%
94.
Albany, GA (housing) (pop. 76,185)2.7%
95.
Port Orange, FL (housing) (pop. 57,203)2.7%
96.
South El Dorado, CA (housing) (pop. 87,572)2.7%
97.
East Jefferson, TX (housing) (pop. 111,383)2.7%
98.
East Kern, CA (housing) (pop. 82,330)2.7%
99.
Salinas, CA (housing) (pop. 155,662)2.7%
100.
Gilroy, CA (housing) (pop. 51,701)2.7%
101.
Decatur, IL (housing) (pop. 74,710)2.6%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.