Top 101 cities with the smallest percentage of likely homosexual households (counted as self-reported same-sex unmarried-partner households) (population 50,000+)

Households distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with the smallest percentage of likely homosexual households (counted as self-reported same-sex unmarried-partner households) (population 50,000+)

RankCityHouseholds
1.
Provo, UT (housing) (pop. 116,288)0.3%
2.
Shelby, MI (housing) (pop. 68,294)0.3%
3.
Canton, MI (housing) (pop. 73,490)0.3%
4.
Lehi, UT (housing) (pop. 54,382)0.3%
5.
Orem, UT (housing) (pop. 91,648)0.3%
6.
West Bloomfield Township, MI (housing) (pop. 65,149)0.4%
7.
Waterford, MI (housing) (pop. 73,473)0.4%
8.
Auburn, AL (housing) (pop. 58,582)0.4%
9.
Novi, MI (housing) (pop. 57,960)0.4%
10.
Tinley Park, IL (housing) (pop. 57,282)0.4%
11.
Waukesha, WI (housing) (pop. 71,016)0.4%
12.
Wheaton, IL (housing) (pop. 53,648)0.4%
13.
College Station, TX (housing) (pop. 100,050)0.4%
14.
Gulf Breeze-Harold, FL (housing) (pop. 67,908)0.4%
15.
Bismarck, ND (housing) (pop. 67,034)0.4%
16.
Diamond Bar, CA (housing) (pop. 56,449)0.4%
17.
Union, NJ (housing) (pop. 54,050)0.4%
18.
Wayne, NJ (housing) (pop. 53,657)0.4%
19.
Rochester Hills, MI (housing) (pop. 72,952)0.4%
20.
Grand Forks, ND (housing) (pop. 54,932)0.4%
21.
Columbus, GA (housing) (pop. 185,888)0.4%
22.
Arlington Heights, IL (housing) (pop. 75,994)0.4%
23.
Edison, NJ (housing) (pop. 101,207)0.4%
24.
Franklin, TN (housing) (pop. 68,886)0.4%
25.
East Jefferson, TX (housing) (pop. 111,383)0.4%
26.
Monterey Park, CA (housing) (pop. 61,085)0.4%
27.
Grand Island, NE (housing) (pop. 50,550)0.4%
28.
St. Charles, MO (housing) (pop. 67,569)0.4%
29.
Lompoc Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 58,405)0.4%
30.
Troy, MI (housing) (pop. 82,821)0.4%
31.
Weymouth, MA (housing) (pop. 54,393)0.4%
32.
Sterling Heights, MI (housing) (pop. 131,224)0.4%
33.
DeSoto, TX (housing) (pop. 51,483)0.4%
34.
Cupertino, CA (housing) (pop. 60,189)0.4%
35.
Ankeny, IA (housing) (pop. 51,567)0.4%
36.
Hialeah, FL (housing) (pop. 233,394)0.5%
37.
Orland Park, IL (housing) (pop. 58,590)0.5%
38.
Loomis Basin-Folsom Lake, CA (housing) (pop. 89,014)0.5%
39.
Maple Grove, MN (housing) (pop. 65,415)0.5%
40.
Blue Springs, MO (housing) (pop. 53,294)0.5%
41.
Tuscaloosa, AL (housing) (pop. 95,334)0.5%
42.
Meridian, ID (housing) (pop. 83,596)0.5%
43.
Florissant, MO (housing) (pop. 52,363)0.5%
44.
Naperville, IL (housing) (pop. 144,864)0.5%
45.
Yorba Linda, CA (housing) (pop. 67,032)0.5%
46.
Fargo, ND (housing) (pop. 113,658)0.5%
47.
Arcadia, CA (housing) (pop. 57,639)0.5%
48.
West Dougherty, GA (housing) (pop. 59,317)0.5%
49.
Lodi, CA (housing) (pop. 63,338)0.5%
50.
Kendale Lakes, FL (housing) (pop. 56,148)0.5%
51.
Idaho Falls, ID (housing) (pop. 58,292)0.5%
52.
Farmington Hills, MI (housing) (pop. 81,295)0.5%
53.
Livonia, MI (housing) (pop. 95,208)0.5%
54.
Port Arthur, TX (housing) (pop. 54,135)0.5%
55.
Sammamish, WA (housing) (pop. 50,169)0.5%
56.
Rapid City, SD (housing) (pop. 70,812)0.5%
57.
Elyria, OH (housing) (pop. 53,956)0.5%
58.
Apple Valley, MN (housing) (pop. 50,201)0.5%
59.
Kingsport, TN (housing) (pop. 52,962)0.5%
60.
St. Peters, MO (housing) (pop. 54,842)0.5%
61.
Palatine, IL (housing) (pop. 69,350)0.5%
62.
Parma, OH (housing) (pop. 80,429)0.5%
63.
Chesapeake, VA (housing) (pop. 230,571)0.5%
64.
Eau Claire, WI (housing) (pop. 67,545)0.5%
65.
Ames, IA (housing) (pop. 61,792)0.5%
66.
Casper, WY (housing) (pop. 59,628)0.5%
67.
Oshkosh, WI (housing) (pop. 66,778)0.5%
68.
Gardena, CA (housing) (pop. 59,957)0.5%
69.
Flower Mound, TX (housing) (pop. 68,609)0.5%
70.
Albany, GA (housing) (pop. 76,185)0.5%
71.
St. Cloud, MN (housing) (pop. 66,297)0.5%
72.
Lynchburg, VA (housing) (pop. 78,014)0.5%
73.
Schaumburg, IL (housing) (pop. 74,907)0.5%
74.
The Woodlands, TX (housing) (pop. 93,847)0.5%
75.
Tyler, TX (housing) (pop. 100,223)0.5%
76.
Midwest City, OK (housing) (pop. 56,756)0.5%
77.
Cheyenne, WY (housing) (pop. 62,448)0.5%
78.
St. George, UT (housing) (pop. 76,817)0.5%
79.
Decatur, AL (housing) (pop. 55,816)0.5%
80.
Somerset West-Rock Creek, OR (housing) (pop. 62,062)0.5%
81.
Rosemead, CA (housing) (pop. 54,561)0.5%
82.
Sioux City, IA (housing) (pop. 82,459)0.5%
83.
Bossier City, LA (housing) (pop. 66,333)0.5%
84.
Yakima, WA (housing) (pop. 93,257)0.5%
85.
Brazosport, TX (housing) (pop. 71,908)0.5%
86.
Milpitas, CA (housing) (pop. 69,783)0.5%
87.
O'Fallon, MO (housing) (pop. 82,809)0.5%
88.
Blaine, MN (housing) (pop. 60,407)0.5%
89.
North Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 179,550)0.5%
90.
Oak Lawn, IL (housing) (pop. 57,073)0.5%
91.
Dubuque, IA (housing) (pop. 58,253)0.5%
92.
Bartlett, TN (housing) (pop. 58,226)0.5%
93.
Saginaw, MI (housing) (pop. 50,303)0.5%
94.
Suffolk, VA (housing) (pop. 85,728)0.5%
95.
Greater Newark, DE (housing) (pop. 70,573)0.5%
96.
El Toro, CA (housing) (pop. 178,968)0.5%
97.
Lorain, OH (housing) (pop. 63,710)0.5%
98.
Highlands Ranch, CO (housing) (pop. 96,713)0.5%
99.
Southfield, MI (housing) (pop. 73,006)0.5%
100.
Laredo, TX (housing) (pop. 248,142)0.5%
101.
East Seattle, WA (housing) (pop. 512,735)0.5%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2016 Advameg, Inc.