Ozone/Oxygen therapy, a possible cure?

[suzy_q2010]

Originally Posted by Hveragerthi

Really? So you mean these studies on the use of hydrogen peroxide for therapy readily found on Medline are just an illusion?:

Exogenous low dose hydrogen peroxide increases hypoxia-inducible fa... - PubMed - NCBI

Preconditioning by an in situ administration of hydrogen peroxide: ... - PubMed - NCBI

Hydrogen peroxide preconditioning protects PC12 cells against apopt... - PubMed - NCBI

Nuclear factor-kappaB mediates cytoprotection of hydrogen peroxide ... - PubMed - NCBI

Protection of oxidative preconditioning against apoptosis induced b... - PubMed - NCBI

You will have to go to the medical library for this one:

Cardiac resuscitation with hydrogen peroxide. - PubMed - NCBI

But in short they found ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest could be reversed with the application of dilute hydrogen peroxide.

This one you will probably also have to go to the medical library for. But the article basically talks about the use of IV peroxide for the treatment of pneumonia:

INFLUENZAL PNEUMONIA : THE INTRAVENOUS INJECTION OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE. : The Lancet

There are plenty of others but people need to actually look instead of assuming that the research does not exist.



[url="http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm150592.htm"]

Very misleading. They are talking about the ingestion of 35% peroxide. Anyone knowing about peroxide therapy and how to use it properly knows that you NEVER ingest 35% peroxide, which is very concentrated. So what they are referring to as recommend use IS NOT recommended use. Just goes to prove what morons the FDA people are.

None of the first five links are about medical use of peroxide. They are basic science studies and implicate possible involvement of peroxide in cellular injury. None of them imply that peroxide given intravenously is safe or effective for any disease.

Your last two links are from 1920 and 1966. If they had led to anything useful, I suspect there would be something more about them at PubMed.

Intravenous peroxide is dangerous and has not been shown to be safe or effective for any medical condition.

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/pitfalls-in-regulating-physicians-part-1/

Unintentional ingestion of concentrated hydrogen peroxide is not uncommon and can result in gas embolism. It has resulted in severe injuries and deaths, including deaths of children who accidentally drank it.

Originally Posted by hellothereIN

That's ridiculous. Back in the old days peroxide was frequently used as a mouthwash. It NEVER caused tissue necrosis. The worse that happened to people is that sometimes they would develop "hairy tongue".

Peroxide used topically is not the same as being taken internally, either by mouth or intravenously.

What I have learned about the chemo/radiate protocols is they destroy and devastate the immune cells? Am I wrong?
Heard a once a drug rep tell a chilling story that chemo will destroy the bodys ability to fight disease in any form while the patient is also becoming severely malnourished.

Chemo and radiation both affect both cancer cells and normal cells. They work because they have a greater effect on cancer cells. They will reduce the body's ability to fight infection, so people who take them are generally advised on ways to reduce their risk of acquiring infections, such as by taking a flu vaccine and having family members also be immunized.

http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/preventinfections/pdf/neutropenia.pdf

Nutrition can be a problem due to nausea or mouth sores, but it is not necessary for someone on chemo to actually become malnourished. There are ways to deal with those side effects.

http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/002903-pdf.pdf

The bottom line is that without therapy folks die from the diseases for which they use chemo and radiation. there is no scientific evidence that intravenous hydrogen peroxide will treat any cancer, and using it can be fatal.

I realize that this is the alternative medicine forum. However, in the case of hydrogen peroxide there is no proven benefit to its use internally and considerable risk of harm. It is irresponsible to advocate its use.

[openmike]

Hyper oxygenation causes oxidation at the cellular level longterm, but is necessary to maintain SPO2 (oxygen saturation at an above 86%- 92% in normally hypoxia respiratory compromised COPD and non obstructive disorders. 02 diffuses rapidly Moderator cut: unacceptable reference one contradiction is that due to oxygen being a cerebral vasoconstrictor some folks have used 02 to treat migraines , but with only s few minutes of relief. 02 cafes are the best example of ignorance within the lay community and how business reaps from bogus application.

[in_newengland]

This thread has run its course and is now closed.