Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Americas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-23-2014, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,988 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465

Advertisements

from British newspaper The Guardian website:


Why Dilma Rousseff could win Brazil’s presidential election


The country has widely reported problems, but improvements in income and conditions for many workers mean a lot of Brazilians have done well over the past decade


Mark Weisbrot
theguardian.com, Thursday 2 October 2014 12.13 BST


When challenger Marina Silva pulled ahead of incumbent Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff in the polls a few weeks ago there was a lot of excitement in the US business press, and Brazilian financial markets.

Rousseff’s Workers’ party (PT) has been in power for 12 years, and a lot of rich and powerful people were ready for a change. Fortune seemed to favour them: the Brazilian economy, having slowed considerably over the past few years, officially went into recession this year – something that would spell the end for many incumbent presidents. Before that, there were street protests over the rising cost of public transport and government spending on the World Cup, and the event itself ended in disaster with a humiliating 7-1 defeat for the national team at the hands of Germany.

Yet Rousseff has bounced back from every blow, and now looks poised to come out on top in both the first and second rounds of the election. How did this happen? If she is re-elected, it could be because the majority of Brazilians are looking at her party’s 12-year record and, for those old or literate enough to remember, comparing this to the past. For the vast majority, the changes are quite striking.

Despite the slowdown of the past few years, and the 2009 world recession, Brazil’s GDP per person grew by an average of 2.5% annually from 2003 to 2014. This was more than three times the growth rate during the preceding two terms of President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who implemented “Washington Consensus” policies and remains a much-preferred statesman in the US capital. Before Cardoso there was a decade-and-a-half of even worse economic failure, and income per person actually fell.

This return to growth, plus the government’s use of increased revenues to boost social spending, has reduced Brazil’s poverty rate by 55% and extreme poverty by 65%. For those in extreme poverty, the government’s internationally renowned conditional cash transfer programme – Bolsa Familia – provided 60% of their income in 2011, up from 10% in 2003. A hefty increase in the minimum wage – 84% since 2003 after adjusting for inflation – also helped quite a bit.

Unemployment has fallen to a record low of 4.9%; it was 12.3% when Lula da Silva took office in 2003. The quality of jobs has also increased: the percentage of workers stuck in the informal sector of the economy shrank from 22% to 13%.


read the rest of the article in the link: Why Dilma Rousseff could win Brazil
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2014, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,988 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
#Dilma13

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2014, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,810,783 times
Reputation: 7168
Can people living in the poorest part(s) of Brazil honestly say they are better off now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2014, 02:42 PM
 
6,385 posts, read 11,886,305 times
Reputation: 6874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy Old Schmo View Post
Can people living in the poorest part(s) of Brazil honestly say they are better off now?
People don't really think this way. Politicians try to simplify it like this, but studies show most voters vote on if the candidate seems likeable and if a candidate connects with them. Whether the economic situation improved means a lot less than if it seems like the leader and party have been paying attention to the voter. If the economy collapses then voters turn because they associate that with their needs being ignored.

This is why technocrats rarely win against populists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Americas
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top