Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The planters/colonists/settlers of Bilad el Amerigo (as well as the coloureds who ape, assimilate & imitate their most despicable characteristics) had formed a nazi pact culminating in the Rio Pact which did a lot of damage in the name of fighting revolutionary socialism.
When you look into segregationist policies around the world, there are two things that appear over and over again.
One is that the countries that put in place some sort of segregation/apartheid tended to be ex-colonies of Britain (USA, South Africa, Rhodesia -now Zimbabwe-, etc). This is not to say that other places had no issues regarding this, just that it tended to be stricter and official in ex-British colonies. If English was the main language used in a place, it went without saying that things such as racial mixture were looked down upon (in some llaces they put laws making racial mixing illegal, imagine that!) and racial segregation tended to be stronger and stricter.
The other is how the USA comes up as a source of inspiration for many of these things, even if many Americans are not up to hearing about this. There is the case of Australia as mentioned before, its restrictions were modelled after similar ones already imposed in the USA. A long time ago, though I don't remember his name, I saw an interview made to some South African leader and he said that South Africa's apartheid was actually modelled after the USA's segregation, which already existed for many years before apartheid was imposed in South Africa. Of course, the USA began to dismantle segregation in the 1960's while South Africa's apartheid began to crumble in the 1980's, I think. The point is that the USA appears to be used as a model to copy and often times the USA was ahead of the curb so to speak. Apartheid arose after segregation was in place for many years in the USA. Apartheid fell after segregation had crumbled for many years in the USA.
At least I see a pattern here of monkey see, monkey do. Just that often the hand of the USA serving as a model of admiration and copy in other parts of the world seem to go into hiding when it sees fit. Apartheid in places like South Africa didn't appear out of thin air. Rhodesia's apartheid was copied from South Africa, but South Africa's apartheid was inspired by American segregation.
The question is, where did American segregation came from? Plus, why the countries that adopted similar policies tended to be ex-British colonies for the most part?
Segregation was normal in the colonies not based on race though long before black white. Still perplexed by those terms when the British stock founders of the USA never considered Irish, or most certainly Greeks, Italians etc "white". Irish were depicted as apes and monkeys. But as it relates to today.....if you shipped 5 million whites to DR, Japan, Pakistan, Angola there would be a major freak out, maybe a mass killing of them.
The wealthiest parts of the Western Hemisphere were in Latin America. The major cities not just in population, but also in influence and wealth were places like Mexico City. That has been the case for most of the time since colonization started in the 1500's.
The other aspect is that the USA itself has invaded much of Latin America, particularly starting on the second half of the 1800's. The USA has never been invaded by any Latin American country (and excepting Britain in the War of 1812, no country in the world has even attempted to invade the USA.)
This map presents a partial information. For example, the US militarily invaded the Dominican Republic in 1916 until 1924 and there is no mention of that. That was the most important US invasion of the DR, becsuse until then the USA was not the most important country for the DR. Most likely there are other US invasions in Latin America not commented here. In fact, Haiti has been invaded for much longer by the USA, including the first time from 1915 to 1934 (19 years under US military occupation, unbelivable) and that too isn't mention in the map. *
* Here are some photos (the wording is in Spanish, but photos say more than words) taken in the Dominican Republic during the first US military invasion 1916-1924: https://losdominicanos.org/2022/03/1...ana-1916-1924/
I'm not blaming the US for the current economic situation in much of Latin America, but lets not pretend Uncle Sam didn't do its part in adding wood to the fire. If Latin America would had treated the US in kind with its own invasions of the USA, I highly doubt the cuurent economic situation in the USA would be the case.
Why the USA in a position to treat as opposed to be treated upon? It seems they were superior.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
