Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Architecture Forum
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2008, 09:41 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,613,896 times
Reputation: 12304

Advertisements

This is a cool article with photo's i read on Popular Mechanics Magazine about the next 10 hottest Skyscapers either under construction or about to soon start in different countries around the world. Talk about futuristic looking.

For those interested.
Top 10 Future Skyscrapers Under Construction - Skyscraper Construction - Popular Mechanics
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2008, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,689 posts, read 10,415,520 times
Reputation: 973
I am glad I am not on one of the design teams for these towers!!! Talk about stress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2008, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Land of Free Johnson-Weld-2016
6,470 posts, read 16,395,056 times
Reputation: 6520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
I am glad I am not on one of the design teams for these towers!!! Talk about stress.
My thoughts exactly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2008, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,689 posts, read 10,415,520 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinkytoes View Post
My thoughts exactly
These are one of the main reasons why I do Residential Design, although I LOVE to look at the large towers, I would never want to do the repetitive natures involved in 600+ sheet construction sets, and the thousands of details that have to be EXACT over and over again lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2008, 11:08 PM
 
Location: Greenfield, Mo.
82 posts, read 259,756 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
These are one of the main reasons why I do Residential Design, although I LOVE to look at the large towers, I would never want to do the repetitive natures involved in 600+ sheet construction sets, and the thousands of details that have to be EXACT over and over again lol.

Exact is an understatement. Just one little thing off just a tiny tiny little bit could blow the entire project. I've always enjoyed looking at these things and I have no fear of heights but you have to wonder... just how 'good' are these people when they design these things. Something about the one being built that can be added on to that will be almost 1/2 a mile high at its highest point? That is a long ways up there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2008, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
19 posts, read 39,598 times
Reputation: 13
After 9-11, the landscape has changed. Tall buildings are now but a folly to resurrect the Tower of Babel trying to reach heaven. When I heard Donald Trump express his apprehension on very tall buildings, I heaved a sigh of relief knowing that some developers can feel what I felt in my gut as I watched the NYC Twin Towers tumble to the ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2008, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Greenfield, Mo.
82 posts, read 259,756 times
Reputation: 83
Yes JuLio, but the buildings did exactly what they were designed to do IF something like that happened. I am very sad it happened. I'm a volunteer firefighter and part of dog search/rescue team. We went up there. It wasn't a pleasant thing to deal with. But as I said, those buildings did exactly what they were suppose to do. They collapsed upon themselves as designed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 06:56 PM
 
Location: MO Ozarkian in NE Hoosierana
4,682 posts, read 12,056,574 times
Reputation: 6992
The Bow in Calgary,,, sexy sweet Like that.

Al Hamra is quite nice too, as is the Russian Federation Tower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2008, 01:08 AM
 
Location: USA
3,966 posts, read 10,696,802 times
Reputation: 2228
any plans to get off of steal,cement, and start using nano tubes?

I could see floating maglev's in between these sky scrappers, as there is no room to put them anywhere else
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2012, 12:42 AM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,216 posts, read 29,026,930 times
Reputation: 32608
That's all Shanghai needs is another gortesque super-tower to mar up their already eclectic, unattractive skyline. I think Shanghai has the same inferiority complex Chicago has, taller is better. Shanghai will never be another Hong Kong and Chicago will never be another NYC. So? They settle for the second-best, having the tallest, and being extremely "windy" about their cities!

I do like the new Beekman Tower in NYC. Generally, I can't stand Frank Gehry's creations, but he surprised me with this one!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Architecture Forum

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top