Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Japanese do not like foreigners,they dont like interacial marriage as it corrupts the race.
They dont care for other ASIANs,they dont like blue eyes devils,so ?
How will japan solve its future population crisis?
I don't think it will.
But as the population of Japan shrinks, so will most countries. South Korea, Russia, China, Eastern European nations lead the shrinkage.
Most demographers believe North America will continue to attract immigrants and will stave off the collapse for many years.
I don't think it will.
But as the population of Japan shrinks, so will most countries. South Korea, Russia, China, Eastern European nations lead the shrinkage.
Most demographers believe North America will continue to attract immigrants and will stave off the collapse for many years.
Agree, but I think it more important to see what is going to happen in 50 years and not 150 years when we are all dead.
If the fertility rate is 1.5 - 2 like the USA and Western European countries and there is immigration, then the population won't drop at all.
If the fertility rate is 1.2 - 1.5 with limited immigration like Eastern Europe and Japan, then the problem is bigger but manageable. Then 100 grandparents get 68 kids who get 34 kids. Add some limited immigration, and you can reduce the severity of these numbers. This is why I think we should worry about other countries than Japan.
The real problem comes when fertility drops below 1, which is true in Korea and in urban China. If the fertility rate is 0.8, then 100 grandparents get 40 kids who get 16 kids. Japan has the highest dependency ratio in the world, but it is still less than half of what the ultra-low fertility countries will experience. In addition, there will also be empty houses everywhere as the 16 grandkids will need a lot less homes than 100 grandparents.
Any country that gets a fertility rate below 1 should panic, but people seem to think short-term and just double down on failed policies.
The world will be a very different place in 150 years. Some of it will hardly be inhabited at all.
What is exactly ‘hardly inhabited’?
Even if Japan dips to 35M people, it will still have around 100 inhab/sq km. The scarcely inhabited areas of the world will likely remain about the same: the Sahara desert, Arctic and subarctic regions, Central Asia, the Amazon basin, etc. Moreover, the two largest low-density countries in the world, Canada and Australia, will keep getting immigrants at least for the few next decades, so they will have an upper ground by the time world population drops.
Unless there is a nuclear war or a massive environmental catastrophe, there won’t be any surprising ‘hardly inhabited’ region in world.
05-17-2022, 09:35 AM
Status:
"From 31 to 41 Countries Visited: )"
(set 3 days ago)
4,640 posts, read 13,912,538 times
Reputation: 4052
Urban yuppies or Japan nationals that just love to Travel actually believe it's cool to not have children. Very simple. Offer them tons of governing system paid monthly annual incentives. Reward them for the hard work of raising kids! Even give them a dream house outside in the Japanese suburbs.
May be they dont care,food is always expensive in Japan,less people is good
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
