Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2019, 01:24 PM
 
14,994 posts, read 23,971,956 times
Reputation: 26540

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Yah. Of course Japan had to rebuild the cities - the two we nuked, & all the others we firebombed. They didn't have a choice - the interior of Japan is unsuitable for infrastructure - all their big cities, comms, transportation, energy, health, government, population centers, manufacturing - it's all on the edges of the islands - where there's flat ground to work with.

The firebombing campaign did raze most of the built-up areas of Imperial Japan to the ground. It was designed to do that, because IJ manufacturing was tied into the same built-up areas as the military, ports, bases, government compounds. If everything is collocated, it's impossible to attack only one segment of the entities there.
Nagasaki was about 40% destroyed (buildings flattened or significantly damaged). Hey war brings destruction. Total war brings total destruction. Such was the terrible reality of World War II, such was the acts that both sides, allies and axis, engaged in. Conventional fire bombing in Japan as you probably know killed more civilians than the atomic bombing.

It's important to note that Japan had a way out - surrender. They finally chose that way after the second atomic bomb and in doing saved millions (based on invasion estimates) of both Allied and Japanese lives. And then we helped them rebuild. Those in China and the rest of Asia, occupied by Japan, didn't have a way out. They surrendered, and were still massacred en masse by the Imperial Japanese Army....

...And that, boys and girls, is the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2019, 01:36 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA
8,540 posts, read 6,969,608 times
Reputation: 17155
Yup. Nanking surrendered to the Japanese and in the weeks following the capitulation there are estimates that something like 300,000 Chinese soldiers, civilians, young and old were murdered. US total casualties, combat and accidental were in the 400,000 range on all WWII fronts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 03:29 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,525,683 times
Reputation: 5031
There is no logical reason for Japan not to be allied to the US, since its the world's strongest economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 04:06 PM
 
2,264 posts, read 979,443 times
Reputation: 3047
Bombs away!

Quote:
On 9 August 1945, Kokura was earmarked as the original target for the second atom bomb to be dropped but it was obscured by cloud and smoke from earlier firebombs. After circling the city three times, with bomb doors open, the B-29 bomber 'Bockscar' gave up and flew to its reserve target, Nagasaki.

Here was a city of culture: temples, shrines and 19th-century houses overlooking a deep harbour, the city which inspired Madame Butterfly and is known as the 'Naples of the Orient', on the western edge of the Japanese archipelago. The A-bomb exploded at 11.02am, killing 74,000 people, most of them women, children and the elderly in a traditionally Catholic area. The Urakami Cathedral, which had taken three decades to build, was flattened in three seconds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 06:38 PM
 
1,392 posts, read 2,138,671 times
Reputation: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Agreed. I might add that the U.S. treated Japan much better than Japan had treated the countries it had conquered.

https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/v...l-perspectives

Filipino Genocide during the American occupation. Just saying...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 06:40 PM
 
1,392 posts, read 2,138,671 times
Reputation: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Korea, being one.

North Korea is surely better off under the Kim Dynasty than under Japanese rule for sure!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,513,310 times
Reputation: 5828
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathlete View Post
That reminds me of one of my favorite examples of “American exceptionalism” How we get away with operating a place like Gulagtanamo which we deliberately planted on the soil of one of the last vestiges of Stalinism on earth — Cuba — and then proceed to regularly lecture other countries about human rights.

Go figure.

Cuba should be annexed. Communists don't know how to manage that country. That's prime real estat and good soil to grow imported fruits.



Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Of the US? We installed (@ British prodding) the last Shah of Iran, probably put in the wrong guy. The Brits reneged on their commercial/diplomatic promises to Iran, & consequently provoked the election of a strongly nationalist PM.

We - the US, the CIA specifically - overthrew the PM, reinstated the Shah, but he wasn't a nationalist who embraced the people of Iran. He embraced & fomented the economic & political elites who went along with him & his admin, & crushed all the rest. That didn't last nearly as long as you might think it would.

I don't seem much difference between the mullahs and the previous rulers. THe shah was at least secular though and persian women wouldn't have to cover up with arab hijab.



Quote:
Originally Posted by X14Freak View Post
https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/v...l-perspectives

Filipino Genocide during the American occupation. Just saying...

too bad they didn't get duerte's ancestors



Quote:
Originally Posted by X14Freak View Post
North Korea is surely better off under the Kim Dynasty than under Japanese rule for sure!

too bad kim can't point the nukes at beijing.


https://news.yahoo.com/china-threat-...063237464.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 08:40 PM
 
Location: interior Alaska
6,895 posts, read 5,900,167 times
Reputation: 23425
I'm surprised the combo of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution and Japan-America Security Alliance (and subsequent agreements) hasn't come up more. It was a neat little arrangement for postwar Japan, defanging it in the eyes of the allies, while allowing it to pour funding that would have gone to defense into developing the country economically. It worked out well for Japan in most ways, so why mess with what isn't broken?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 09:02 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,804 posts, read 2,822,457 times
Reputation: 4948
Default It was the best of times,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangerous-Boy View Post
Cuba should be annexed. Communists don't know how to manage that country. That's prime real estat and good soil to grow imported fruits.

I don't seem much difference between the mullahs and the previous rulers. THe shah (of Iran) was at least secular though and persian women wouldn't have to cover up with arab hijab.


Yah, annexing Cuba was discussed in Congress after the Spanish American War. Cuba was apparently too much, & we let them go. We kept Puerto Rico though - it must have been felt to have been easier to chew. & we hung on to the Philippines, although we did have to fight off an insurrection there for a couple of years.

The UK put in the first modern Shah of Iran. He was a professional soldier, & a tough old bird (he came up through the ranks, I believe). He ran a tight ship. The last Shah was weak - we probably should have put in (if we were going to do that for the UK in the first place) his sister, who apparently was the real Mensch of the children. The Shah we put in was much too far out of touch with the ordinary people in Iran - & he gave his intelligence agency free rein to smash any Communists they found. The problem was, to run amok, SAVAK (the intel agency) simply found Communists everywhere, under every bed & in every closet. It was a nice racket, while it lasted. Utterly destructive of the spirit of the country, & directly counterproductive of good government - but when the money comes rolling in, what's a guy to do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,513,310 times
Reputation: 5828
I honestly wouldn't let japan off its leash. They would rape asia again if they could. They are the british of asia. They do provide, a good buffer against communist party of china and people's liberation army.


free tibet!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top