
11-10-2010, 08:57 AM
|
|
|
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 17,462,483 times
Reputation: 11976
|
|
to high public office?
I don't know if it has been discussed here before but I was just thinking that I would be more comfortable with a professed non believer politician who could come up with good ideas/solutions.
Not that I would vote for somebody just because they were a non believer.
I am sure I have voted for some that were faux believers.
I just find it disturbing that some politicians might be asking for Gods help in problem solving.
|

11-10-2010, 09:00 AM
|
|
|
Location: Rome, Georgia
2,753 posts, read 3,792,376 times
Reputation: 2047
|
|
Probably not. It would have no effect on my vote either way, but the majority of American's believe in a higher power of some sort or another, and most that do regard that belief to be of the highest importance.
|

11-10-2010, 09:20 AM
|
|
|
Location: Texas
1,300 posts, read 2,041,143 times
Reputation: 743
|
|
Only if he/she were to lie about their beliefs.
It's very possible there are some closet non-believers in Washington right now.
|

11-10-2010, 09:21 AM
|
|
|
Location: Rome, Georgia
2,753 posts, read 3,792,376 times
Reputation: 2047
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by achickenchaser
Only if he/she were to lie about their beliefs.
It's very possible there are some closet non-believers in Washington right now.
|
Probable. Some of those Television Evangelists are remarkably good at faking it. Add the profession of politician to that.
|

11-10-2010, 09:22 AM
|
|
|
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,421 posts, read 10,275,079 times
Reputation: 7787
|
|
Me thinketh he already has. 
|

11-10-2010, 03:08 PM
|
|
|
Location: CA
2,464 posts, read 6,268,751 times
Reputation: 2639
|
|
I believe it's been polled in the 90 percentile range that an atheist/agnostic could not be elected to public office (so, he/she would have to officially change their view AFTER getting elected which, if I remember correctly, was the case for an Australian politician).
I honestly don't know why being an atheist would be a political hinderance. I can only speculate that there is a deep bias towards non-believers regardless of their capabilities or accomplishments which is sad and truly pathetic at best.
|

11-10-2010, 05:23 PM
|
|
|
Location: The Milky Way Galaxy
2,256 posts, read 6,705,335 times
Reputation: 1518
|
|
Yeah I believed it was polled where American's would rather elect a Muslim than an atheist...as appalling as that sounds.
|

11-10-2010, 05:31 PM
|
|
|
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
3,331 posts, read 5,765,802 times
Reputation: 2079
|
|
It depends. If it someone who publicly states that they are a no kidding non-believer, probably not. That being said, I think we've had plenty of non-believer politicians - even in the White House. It's just that they've never made it a matter of public record.
|

11-10-2010, 07:23 PM
|
|
|
Location: Connecticut, USA
47 posts, read 101,936 times
Reputation: 166
|
|
Short answer: No. It seems all politicians must profess christianity to be elected in the US.
As for their attribution of ideas - well, if they are good ideas I don't care if the politician wants to give credit to an imaginary guy in the sky. Just do something for the country you claim to love, and stop suckling at the corporate teat. 
|

11-10-2010, 09:09 PM
|
|
|
1,114 posts, read 1,170,123 times
Reputation: 463
|
|
Congressman Pete Stark is an atheist. There are also more members of congress who are listed as "unaffiliated" for their religion which could be "code" for being secretly atheist.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|