Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-02-2012, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Mableton, GA USA (NW Atlanta suburb, 4 miles OTP)
11,334 posts, read 26,074,740 times
Reputation: 3995

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcidSnake View Post
I'm saying that the argument that market forces are to blame for Atlanta dropping its rock format is bullcrap. And I'm not concentrating on the "powers-that-be" angle anymore, if I ever was. For clarity's sake I will simply stick to my ultimate logic that mega-corporations regardless of who they are(CBS, Clear, Cumulus, whatever) are to blame for this dynamic of unfairly killing the rock/metal format.
Free markets create oligopolies. Once they reach a certain level, they can do whatever they want if the government does not intervene, and consumers be damned.

We've seen it in many markets. We're seeing it in many more. This shouldn't be a surprise to any student of history.

Last edited by rcsteiner; 09-02-2012 at 11:08 PM.. Reason: Used the right term. I didn't think "oligarchy" was right, and it wasn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2012, 12:08 AM
 
Location: Smryna
69 posts, read 189,529 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcidSnake View Post
It's almost like there is a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts to Atlanta and the radio industry in general. The radio industry claims that it only plays what people want to hear. But at the same time what people want to play, the radio industry refuses to play it...at least on terrestrial radio.

It almost seems as if the radio industry is purposely pushing rock & metal stations off the mainstream radio channels and into satellite radio. Maybe that's because the powers-that-be in the media industry figure that men more that women will more likely pay for this stuff.

But what's truly sad is that I like rock and metal music...but I can't afford to pay monthly for satellite radio. I don't even pay monthly for cable tv. My yearly income simply doesn't support monthly paid entertainment. So I guess it's the white male demographic that's being sought after here. Black men need not apply...as usual.

One more reason why I despise mega-corporations with passion. Beyond what's on the internet, there is for all practical purposes, no real choice in entertainment in this country for people who do not fit the mainstream demographic; or any other cliched box that the corporate marketing industry likes to invent for certain cultural segments of American society.

So much for the de-regulation of the media industry allowing for greater freedom of choice.

Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just how in the heck did we Americans got conned into buying that lying sack of dogcrap?

How!?!

And why won't we trust-bust the media industry like the old days when it was cool to kick the snot out of huge mega-corporations?
We have a winner! the Telecom Act of 1996 is what caused the stagnation of radio. Corporate conglomeration always means less choice, less quality- and nowhere to go. Until now, corporate radio is it's own worst enemy. With the availability of iTunes, MP3, streaming radio, 3G/4G devices, listeners DO have a choice to get what WE want when WE want it. Soon enough these corporate owned stations will go dark as ad dollars slowly dry up and advertisers go elsehwere. With more choices in the dashboard of new cars, you no longer have to listen to the same 25 washout songs over and over followed by 10 minutes of screaming ads and some self-important DJ's who laugh at their own jokes. This industry has created it's own worst enemy.

Do yourself a favor, continue tuning OUT corporate media and support LOCAL community radio (we have WRFG! Awesome non-profit community radio!), and maybe they'll get it, maybe they won't. Maybe they will go off the air, and open up those FM frequencies for other locally owned commercial and non-commercial stations to come on the air and actually serve their communities with LOCAL talent, supported by LOCAL businesses and listeners, and we can have OUR airwaves back from these corporate scumbags who trashed it with their homoginized vomit.

I know I'm dreaming, but one day it may come to be...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2012, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
3,661 posts, read 3,934,898 times
Reputation: 4321
New York does not have the best radio station as far as Top40 goes, and BTW, all of you arguing about stations of different genres of music is ridiculous. Only stations of the same format can be debated against one another.

New York has never had good soft rock/ office-appropriate stations for background music while you're at work. I always wanted more pop/top40 which include doses of rap and techno that would prompt someone changing the station. Then the soft rock station would include about 40 tired old songs from the 80s/90s and play them over and over. I don't want to hear "I Will Survive" and "It's Raining Men" every week. The station catered to such a geriatric crowd that the DJ would say at lunchtime, "Time for your nourishment." I swear.

103.5 KTU is unique and for "Only in NY". It played dance music, but in a flavor only appropriate for NYC. It's the only station in the country I'm aware of that plays "Freestyle" dance music, which could be indigenous to NYC.

KISS102.7 in Los Angeles plays Top40 hits 3-4 months ahead of the rest of the country.

I worked at my first architectural firm in Boston in 1999-2000. Radio was awful there, and my co-workers loved Star94 streamed over the internet. They would always chuckle at the mention of "Spaghetti Junction" during the traffic report.

I'm so thankful for being turned on to 96.1. LOVE IT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,153,897 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by architect77 View Post
New York does not have the best radio station as far as Top40 goes, and BTW, all of you arguing about stations of different genres of music is ridiculous. Only stations of the same format can be debated against one another.

New York has never had good soft rock/ office-appropriate stations for background music while you're at work. I always wanted more pop/top40 which include doses of rap and techno that would prompt someone changing the station. Then the soft rock station would include about 40 tired old songs from the 80s/90s and play them over and over. I don't want to hear "I Will Survive" and "It's Raining Men" every week. The station catered to such a geriatric crowd that the DJ would say at lunchtime, "Time for your nourishment." I swear.

103.5 KTU is unique and for "Only in NY". It played dance music, but in a flavor only appropriate for NYC. It's the only station in the country I'm aware of that plays "Freestyle" dance music, which could be indigenous to NYC.

KISS102.7 in Los Angeles plays Top40 hits 3-4 months ahead of the rest of the country.

I worked at my first architectural firm in Boston in 1999-2000. Radio was awful there, and my co-workers loved Star94 streamed over the internet. They would always chuckle at the mention of "Spaghetti Junction" during the traffic report.

I'm so thankful for being turned on to 96.1. LOVE IT!
Wait, the new 96.1 or the old one?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2012, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
3,661 posts, read 3,934,898 times
Reputation: 4321
Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Wait, the new 96.1 or the old one?
The NEW ONE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2012, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
3,573 posts, read 5,307,141 times
Reputation: 2396
You got my vote!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRFLASHPORT View Post
We have a winner! the Telecom Act of 1996 is what caused the stagnation of radio. Corporate conglomeration always means less choice, less quality- and nowhere to go. Until now, corporate radio is it's own worst enemy. With the availability of iTunes, MP3, streaming radio, 3G/4G devices, listeners DO have a choice to get what WE want when WE want it. Soon enough these corporate owned stations will go dark as ad dollars slowly dry up and advertisers go elsehwere. With more choices in the dashboard of new cars, you no longer have to listen to the same 25 washout songs over and over followed by 10 minutes of screaming ads and some self-important DJ's who laugh at their own jokes. This industry has created it's own worst enemy.

Do yourself a favor, continue tuning OUT corporate media and support LOCAL community radio (we have WRFG! Awesome non-profit community radio!), and maybe they'll get it, maybe they won't. Maybe they will go off the air, and open up those FM frequencies for other locally owned commercial and non-commercial stations to come on the air and actually serve their communities with LOCAL talent, supported by LOCAL businesses and listeners, and we can have OUR airwaves back from these corporate scumbags who trashed it with their homoginized vomit.

I know I'm dreaming, but one day it may come to be...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2012, 06:13 PM
 
7,112 posts, read 10,129,067 times
Reputation: 1781
Quote:
Originally Posted by emcee squared View Post
I was mighty confused this afternoon. I turned on 96.1 and got Rhianna...
Things certainly have changed. I think the heyday for Atlanta radio was the 1970s. Z93, WQXI (94.1), and 96Rock were among the major radio stations. 99X was force much later in "alternative" music.

There used to be a Top 40 Countdown but now the music industry has become so fractured that it's a hard commodity to control and make money on except by live concerts and the artist becoming the commodity.

AM lost out to FM for music and so AM turned to talk and news. And now FM is seeing its music hold slipping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2012, 06:27 PM
 
7,112 posts, read 10,129,067 times
Reputation: 1781
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRFLASHPORT View Post
We have a winner! the Telecom Act of 1996 is what caused the stagnation of radio. Corporate conglomeration always means less choice, less quality- and nowhere to go. Until now, corporate radio is it's own worst enemy. With the availability of iTunes, MP3, streaming radio, 3G/4G devices, listeners DO have a choice to get what WE want when WE want it. Soon enough these corporate owned stations will go dark as ad dollars slowly dry up and advertisers go elsehwere. With more choices in the dashboard of new cars, you no longer have to listen to the same 25 washout songs over and over followed by 10 minutes of screaming ads and some self-important DJ's who laugh at their own jokes. This industry has created it's own worst enemy.

Do yourself a favor, continue tuning OUT corporate media and support LOCAL community radio (we have WRFG! Awesome non-profit community radio!), and maybe they'll get it, maybe they won't. Maybe they will go off the air, and open up those FM frequencies for other locally owned commercial and non-commercial stations to come on the air and actually serve their communities with LOCAL talent, supported by LOCAL businesses and listeners, and we can have OUR airwaves back from these corporate scumbags who trashed it with their homoginized vomit.

I know I'm dreaming, but one day it may come to be...
Personally, I think radio is being marginalized by the internet and ipods. A major paradigm shift in communications is going on. I've been hearing ads on the radio urging listeners to voice support for free access to radio on your cell phone. In the future, you might be regularly streaming a radio station from a web address rather than tuning in to a frequency. Opening up the radio frequencies to more internet might be better than tying a frequency to a particular station.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Smryna
69 posts, read 189,529 times
Reputation: 84
the problem is the Internet (especially mobile) is not available, nor affordable, to everyone. There are large portions of the country that still don't have some kind of broadband available at their homes, and wireless is even less reliable if available. Internet is a finite resource, and ISP's know this, which is why they are introducing data caps, even on fixed connections. The current streaming technologies make it impractical for large numbers of users to share connections without using large bandwidth. Bandwidth, servers, and such are not free. The Internet, or the ability to access it, is subject to interruptions that make streams unavailable, not to mention the delay that can occur.

Terrestrial radio is still king in this area. Everyone is within 10 feet of a radio when they are in a car, at work, at home, and at most businesses. Radio requires no bi-directional data connection to function, reception is completely passive, so no strain is put on a broadcaster whether 1 receiver is tuned in or a million. So long as the facility is intact and functional, reception is not affected (at least on FM) by severe weather, riots, terrorism, or anything else. Radios are cheap and most people have several. No subscription is needed, and it's an invaluable tool for mass notification during emergencies, weather events, etc.

Radio has proven invaluable during Hurricane Katrina, the NE blackouts in 2003, September 11, 2001, and even the most recent event, Issac. Portable radios can run on batteries for days, require little infrastructure compared to complex cellular networks, and can reach millions.
Internet streaming is a nice add-on, but it augments, not replaces, terrestrial radio. At least for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
3,661 posts, read 3,934,898 times
Reputation: 4321
Over-the-air television is making a comeback and I haven't had cable since 2006. I love it, with all the major networks, local stations like Peachtree tv, and especially "Antenna TV" and less so, "MeTV". HD picture quality using an antenna is better than cable, because it's not compressed. In Midtown my antenna receives over 60 channels, but most of them are horrible infomercials. There is some cool stuff like France24 hour news. You can even watch HSN over the air.

I agree radio will always have its place.

For my personal music, I just download free podcasts from my favorite djs worldwide and listen to them on my ipod. I've never paid anything except $49 for my ipod shuffle, and I always have fresh new music.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top