Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-14-2014, 03:48 PM
 
10,396 posts, read 11,496,468 times
Reputation: 7830

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by demonta4 View Post
The only reason Clayton wants to do 0.5 percent is because it has one of the highest sales tax in Georgia. State law requires that sales tax can't be over 7 percent. But the new legislation they passed can make the sales tax Clayton passes up to 2 percent.
I understand what you are saying, but Clayton County needs to understand that choosing to pay only an 0.5% sales tax means that the county will most assuredly have no chance of receiving rail transit service as long as the county-by-county sales tax remains the dominant form of funding for MARTA.

That's because the full 1% sales tax is currently inadequate to fund bus and rail transit service in Fulton and DeKalb counties. Clayton County needs to understand that an 0.5% sales tax may barely fund a very-basic level of local bus service at best and that rail transit service will likely be completely out of the question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2014, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,156,709 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Born 2 Roll View Post
That's a major part of the problem with the way that we approach transit around these parts.

Transit cannot be viable (both financially and from a public opinion standpoint) over the long-term by basically just aiming to serve people who cannot drive (very low-income transit-dependent riders who have no other choice but to ride transit to get around until they can gain enough income to 'escape' from an under-funded bare-bones transit system of last-resort).

Transit must have choice riders (people who can drive if they don't ride transit) and the abundant revenues they bring to remain viable both financially and in the court of public opinion.

We must actively and aggressively target higher-income choice riders (with very-high levels of transit service, upscale transit-oriented development along transit lines, etc) if we want transit to be viable both financially and in the court of public opinion.

It is lower-income transit-dependent riders who benefit the most when a transit system collects abundant amounts of revenue from choice riders to remain financially viable and operational at the high level that the entire community needs.
Choice riders can indeed become part of the strategy for MARTA expansion into Clayton, but only if this expansion includes rail. For whatever reason, buses tend to have an even greater stigma about them than rail does, even though it's largely the same group of people who ride.

Question--what are the options for Clayton that would allow for MARTA expansion? Do they have to take the 1% no matter what, or is there a way to get bus-only for now with 0.5%? (Not that I want the latter; I just want to know what the possibilities are.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2014, 08:31 PM
bu2
 
24,100 posts, read 14,879,963 times
Reputation: 12932
Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Choice riders can indeed become part of the strategy for MARTA expansion into Clayton, but only if this expansion includes rail. For whatever reason, buses tend to have an even greater stigma about them than rail does, even though it's largely the same group of people who ride.

Question--what are the options for Clayton that would allow for MARTA expansion? Do they have to take the 1% no matter what, or is there a way to get bus-only for now with 0.5%? (Not that I want the latter; I just want to know what the possibilities are.)
Park n rides don't have a stigma.

But it would be nice if MARTA heavy rail could go into Clayton other than just the Clayton Co. part of the airport. Then more than just downtown would be connected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2014, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,358 posts, read 6,526,600 times
Reputation: 5176
Any rail service to Clayton is at least 20 years away. The I-20 East and GA-400 projects are...well actual projects rather than wild conjecture and even they won't be here for about 15 years at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2014, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Georgia
4,209 posts, read 4,745,125 times
Reputation: 3626
The Commuter Rail to Lovejoy should've been here already, it was ahead of those other lines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2014, 11:49 PM
 
10,396 posts, read 11,496,468 times
Reputation: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Choice riders can indeed become part of the strategy for MARTA expansion into Clayton, but only if this expansion includes rail. For whatever reason, buses tend to have an even greater stigma about them than rail does, even though it's largely the same group of people who ride.
That's an excellent point that buses tend to have a stigma attached to them much of the time.

But one of the reasons that buses often times tend to have a stigma attached to them is because we traditionally have not always done a great job of assertively (if not aggressively) targeting bus service at choice riders...
...Just like a large urban transit agency like MARTA has not necessarily always done a good job of targeting most of its transit service (both bus and rail) at choice riders, seeming instead to more-often target its service mostly at cash-limited transit-dependent riders, whether intentionally or unintentionally.

MARTA's failure to target its transit service at revenue-rich choice-riders is one of the very-major reasons why the agency has experienced steep declines in ridership and revenues in recent years. Though things seem to be finally turning around and heading in a positive direction at the long-troubled transit agency.

It should also be noted that GRTA Xpress seems to do a decent (but by no means exceptional) job at targeting their regional commuter express bus transit service at choice riders. Though like MARTA, GRTA Xpress definitely also needs to improve its efforts to attract (and retain) new riders.

Also like MARTA, GRTA Xpress also urgently needs to cultivate new and additional sources of revenue so that it can operate at the higher level that is needed for the agency to continue to have a positive impact on mobility throughout the community/metro region.

Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Question--what are the options for Clayton that would allow for MARTA expansion? Do they have to take the 1% no matter what, or is there a way to get bus-only for now with 0.5%? (Not that I want the latter; I just want to know what the possibilities are.)
From what I understand and from what has seemingly been reported, Clayton County seems to have the option of only paying an 0.5% sales tax and seems to not have to pay the 1% sales tax that Fulton and DeKalb counties currently pay.

It basically appears that MARTA is willing to let Clayton County join the agency at an 0.5% sales tax rate.

It seems that MARTA and Fulton and DeKalb counties (and almost all parties involved) are willing to let Clayton County join the agency at a reduced sales tax rate because they understand how badly Clayton County is in need of transit service (any transit service...even a very-limited amount of bus service) after more than 4 years of no local bus service in a highly-impoverished urban/post-suburban county.

(...With 21.5% of the county's residents living below the poverty line, Clayton County has the highest countywide poverty rate in metro Atlanta.)

With the 0.5% sales tax rate, Clayton County would most likely only get a limited amount of bus service because that is all that the revenues from an 0.5% sales tax would be able to fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2014, 12:22 AM
 
10,396 posts, read 11,496,468 times
Reputation: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonta4 View Post
The Commuter Rail to Lovejoy should've been here already, it was ahead of those other lines.
I completely agree as the State of Georgia had long received funds from the Feds to operate commuter trains between Atlanta and Lovejoy. Commuter trains should have long been operating south of Atlanta by now.

Though, at this point in time and moving forward, with Clayton County being such an urbanized county and with the county and South Metro Atlanta in general needing the economic development and investment opportunities that come with transit, regional heavy rail transit service between Atlanta and the Atlanta Motor Speedway in Hampton is the best long-term high-capacity transit option for Clayton County.

Clayton County is an urban enough county that it needs regional heavy rail transit service, not just peak-hour commuter rail service.

Premium regional commuter rail service should operate from Hampton south to Griffin, Macon, Warner Robins and Perry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2014, 08:20 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,120,315 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
Any rail service to Clayton is at least 20 years away. The I-20 East and GA-400 projects are...well actual projects rather than wild conjecture and even they won't be here for about 15 years at least.
Gotta start somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2014, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,863,148 times
Reputation: 5703
MARTA did pitch to Clayton board that they could use the federal funding along with GDOT's funding to get the commuter rail implemented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2014, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,358 posts, read 6,526,600 times
Reputation: 5176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
Gotta start somewhere.
My point is that we have probably 5-10 years to get the details of rail funding settled out. Possibly that could mean join now at 0.5% then increase it to 1% in a few years to get rail service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top