Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2015, 01:07 PM
 
202 posts, read 231,269 times
Reputation: 247

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tryska View Post
So This happened at the East Point Council Meeting last week. 3 State reps showed up to duke it out about the "City of South Fulton"

I'm kinda pissed that they wasted East Point's time on something the City has no say in, and I'm pissed at some of East Point's council-people for not being smart enough to pick up on that.

The shenanigans start at 17:25

Video Outline - City of East Point, Georgia
East Point...oh my. I lived there for 37 years, in the same house and have moved (14 mos. ago), as I could no longer abide the p_ss poor government. Can't sell my house as the neighborhood has tanked. Oh happy day!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2015, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Murfreesboro, Tennessee
126 posts, read 231,860 times
Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
From the article:
Currently, four possible cities --LaVista Hills, South DeKalb, South Fulton, and Tucker-- are under consideration by the Georgia General Assembly. But it does not appear any of those cityhood bills will be considered until 2016.

"It is my intent that we try and do it the right way with a two-year study," Rynders said.
Maybe this is for the best. This all seems incredibly rushed anyway, and will give the majority of working people time to think about this and how cityhood is going to affect their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 07:33 AM
 
2,092 posts, read 3,224,245 times
Reputation: 1103
House Bill 165 calls for a referendum on forming the City of South Fulton next November. If voters in unincorporated Fulton decide to form the city, they’d elect a mayor and city council during the 2016 presidential primary.

A previous version of the bill – filed before the current legislative session – called for a vote on cityhood in March.

Under HB 165, the new city would include all remaining unincorporated areas of Fulton County as they exist 90 days prior to the election – a move that will give existing cities time to annex some areas, if they choose. Currently, the unincorporated area covers about 105 square miles bounded roughly by Atlanta to the north, Chattahoochee Hills to the south, College Park to the east and Douglas County to the west. More than 90,000 people live in the area..."

Full Story: New south Fulton bill pushes cityhood vote to November | www.ajc.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 08:30 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,120,315 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by LynnHarris View Post
House Bill 165 calls for a referendum on forming the City of South Fulton next November. If voters in unincorporated Fulton decide to form the city, they’d elect a mayor and city council during the 2016 presidential primary.

A previous version of the bill – filed before the current legislative session – called for a vote on cityhood in March.

Under HB 165, the new city would include all remaining unincorporated areas of Fulton County as they exist 90 days prior to the election – a move that will give existing cities time to annex some areas, if they choose. Currently, the unincorporated area covers about 105 square miles bounded roughly by Atlanta to the north, Chattahoochee Hills to the south, College Park to the east and Douglas County to the west. More than 90,000 people live in the area..."

Full Story: New south Fulton bill pushes cityhood vote to November | www.ajc.com
Hope Atlanta, Union City, and Fairburn start cleaning up their boundaries ASAP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 11:57 AM
bu2
 
24,093 posts, read 14,879,963 times
Reputation: 12929
Window closing on annexation, cityhood legislation - Decaturish

....
If you don’t have decisions made within a week or two time will just run out before this Legislative session,” Holcomb said. “If we’re going to see anything, it will be within the next two weeks.”
There’s still some speculation about who the sponsors for the various proposals will be.
State Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver has said she would be introducing Decatur’s proposal, assuming it will be introduced. There’s no word on who Avondale Estates sponsor might be, and no sponsor confirmed for the Together In Atlanta proposal. The most likely candidate for Avondale Estates annexation legislation would be state Rep. Karla Drenner, D-Avondale Estates, but she has not made a firm commitment to doing so. Her reluctance is understandable. It did kind of blow up in her face the last time she introduced a bill on Avondale’s behalf.
Greenhaven’s sponsor is expected to be state Rep. Pam Stephenson, D-Decatur. Jason Lary, with the city of Stonecrest, said state Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick, D-Lithonia, and state Rep. Tonya Anderson, D-Lithonia, will be the cosponsors of that cityhood bill. State Rep. Billy Mitchell, D-Stone Mountain, previously sponsored a placeholder bill for Tucker and is expected to sponsor it again.
Negotiations around LaVista Hills appear to be the key sticking point at the moment.
LaVista Hills map overlaps with the Together in Atlanta annexation proposal. Currently there are negotiations going on behind the scenes to resolve those boundary disputes. Decaturish has also learned that legislators are carefully considering whether to move ahead with annexation bills this year and introduce cityhood bills next year, or try to resolve the border disputes this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 12:05 PM
 
1,979 posts, read 2,383,252 times
Reputation: 1263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
Hope Atlanta, Union City, and Fairburn start cleaning up their boundaries ASAP.
What do you mean?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, and Raleigh
2,580 posts, read 2,485,338 times
Reputation: 1614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
Hope Atlanta, Union City, and Fairburn start cleaning up their boundaries ASAP.
Atlanta is already on it on...

This is the foolishness like last time it will likely fail again...

Last edited by jero23; 02-19-2015 at 01:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, and Raleigh
2,580 posts, read 2,485,338 times
Reputation: 1614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tryska View Post
What do you mean?
This isn't nothing but Roger Bruce's attempt to incorporate areas that areas basically surrounded by those cities. He doesn't want the existing municipalities to annex anything. However, he doesn't realize the constituents in these areas are either happy with status quo, desiring to be annexed by the municipality closest to them (such as Union City, Fairburn, Palmetto, East Point, etc.), or be annexed into the City of Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,120,315 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tryska View Post
What do you mean?
Union City Map

Fairburn Map

Lots of unincorporated islands and bizarre shapes in south Fulton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2015, 02:07 PM
 
1,979 posts, read 2,383,252 times
Reputation: 1263
Quote:
Originally Posted by jero23 View Post
This isn't nothing but Roger Bruce's attempt to incorporate areas that areas basically surrounded by those cities. He doesn't want the existing municipalities to annex anything. However, he doesn't realize the constituents in these areas are either happy with status quo, desiring to be annexed by the municipality closest to them (such as Union City, Fairburn, Palmetto, East Point, etc.), or be annexed into the City of Atlanta.
And they are all stirring the pot with Citizens and Council people in East Point. I kinda wish we'd annex the whole thing just to shut up the noise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
Union City Map

Fairburn Map

Lots of unincorporated islands and bizarre shapes in south Fulton.
ugh! I had no idea there were little internal pockets. What's in those areas that they haven't been annexed already, I wonder?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top