Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2016, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,696,314 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Typically when a state embarks on major road projects, stakeholders must be consulted, public opinion must be invited, and other alternatives must be carefully weighed. The process is designed to help states avoid building ill-conceived projects, and make sure the best option wins.

Since freight traffic has different patterns at different times of day than commuter traffic, studying whether separating the two would help as much as a regular road widening is particularly important.
None of that has happened yet with the truck lanes, two northbound-only lanes that would parallel I-75 between Interstate 475 in Macon and Ga. 155 in McDonough.

GDOT Chief Engineer Meg Pirkle said that examining alternatives and gathering public feedback will be the next step.
Quote:
“A truck-only lane with no toll is getting real close to a gratuity,” said Neill Herring, a longtime lobbyist for the Sierra Club in Georgia, which advocates for transit funding. “$2 billion would put multiple passenger trains between Macon and Atlanta. That investment would remove far more vehicles from the roads than the truck lanes.”
Being the person I am, I'll have to side with Neill Herring. The rail corridor(s) between Atlanta and Macon are expected to become congested in the upcoming years. The Norfolk Southern Atlanta South district, which runs between Atlanta and Macon, is rated, by the GDOT, to have a practical daily capacity of 35-55 trains. It currently runs 25-35 trains per day. The line between Macon and Savannah, Savannah district, is already at capacity with 25-35 daily trains on a line designed to practically handle 25-35 daily trains. (Source: 2015 Georgia State Rail Plan, page 125)

$2 Billion for 40 miles = 50 Million per mile, nearly twice the high end cost of commuter rail. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx JUST asked the southeastern states to band together to form a coalition of unified rail efforts. He explained that, with such an organization at the head of projects for BOTH freight and passenger service, we could handle much more capacity than we could otherwise. He pointed to the start of the FASTLANE program, which specifically targets freight enhancement projects on highways, ports, and rails.

Here's a suggestion that I hope the GDOT / State considers, in some part, in their studies: Go bigger. Take the entire stretch between Atlanta to Macon to Savannah, and upgrade it. 95% of the mainline in the state is single-tracked, using sidings to pass trains. I say we get with Norfolk Southern, and put up our $2 Billion with as much help / backing from federal grants as we can, and do a Public Private Partnership to double-track the mainline all the way down into Savannah.

The State would offer this to NS in exchange to multiple (~5) daily trains along the newly upgraded line. Have Savannah, Atlanta, and Macon, as well as any other towns in between, pitch in for their own station's construction, and we're in business.

The State gets increased freight capacity to go with the deepened port, as well as finally running passenger service between three of its top 5 cities. Norfolk Southern, a company headquartered in Atlanta, gets upgraded capacity for a fraction of the cost to themselves. Everyone wins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2016, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,531,454 times
Reputation: 5182
As the state rail plan points out though, most of Georgia's trackage is single with passing sidings. In fact, far less is double track than I thought, mostly just terminal areas and their approaches really. It should cost far less to add track capacity to the railroad than new lanes to the same corridor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2016, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,696,314 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
As the state rail plan points out though, most of Georgia's trackage is single with passing sidings. In fact, far less is double track than I thought, mostly just terminal areas and their approaches really. It should cost far less to add track capacity to the railroad than new lanes to the same corridor.
That's exactly what I'm proposing!

We get the state's $2 Bil. some federal grant money from FASTLANE and maybe TIGER, and try and convince Norfolk Southern to pick up whatever the remaining rail upgrade costs would be to double-track all the way between Atlanta to Macon to Savannah.

Let each city pay for their station via TOD, P3, Sales Tax, other grants, etc. which should include rip tracks to pull passenger trains off the mainline. NS gets massively upgraded mainlines, with the condition that the state can run 8-10 (4-5 in each direction) Inter-city trains on the improved line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,876,648 times
Reputation: 5703
Trucking Company lobbyist are probably pushing this with campaign donations to keep their edge over RR companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 06:48 AM
 
2,289 posts, read 2,947,622 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Trucking Company lobbyist are probably pushing this with campaign donations to keep their edge over RR companies.
Yep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 06:58 AM
bu2
 
24,107 posts, read 14,896,004 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
Being the person I am, I'll have to side with Neill Herring. The rail corridor(s) between Atlanta and Macon are expected to become congested in the upcoming years. The Norfolk Southern Atlanta South district, which runs between Atlanta and Macon, is rated, by the GDOT, to have a practical daily capacity of 35-55 trains. It currently runs 25-35 trains per day. The line between Macon and Savannah, Savannah district, is already at capacity with 25-35 daily trains on a line designed to practically handle 25-35 daily trains. (Source: 2015 Georgia State Rail Plan, page 125)

$2 Billion for 40 miles = 50 Million per mile, nearly twice the high end cost of commuter rail. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx JUST asked the southeastern states to band together to form a coalition of unified rail efforts. He explained that, with such an organization at the head of projects for BOTH freight and passenger service, we could handle much more capacity than we could otherwise. He pointed to the start of the FASTLANE program, which specifically targets freight enhancement projects on highways, ports, and rails.

Here's a suggestion that I hope the GDOT / State considers, in some part, in their studies: Go bigger. Take the entire stretch between Atlanta to Macon to Savannah, and upgrade it. 95% of the mainline in the state is single-tracked, using sidings to pass trains. I say we get with Norfolk Southern, and put up our $2 Billion with as much help / backing from federal grants as we can, and do a Public Private Partnership to double-track the mainline all the way down into Savannah.

The State would offer this to NS in exchange to multiple (~5) daily trains along the newly upgraded line. Have Savannah, Atlanta, and Macon, as well as any other towns in between, pitch in for their own station's construction, and we're in business.

The State gets increased freight capacity to go with the deepened port, as well as finally running passenger service between three of its top 5 cities. Norfolk Southern, a company headquartered in Atlanta, gets upgraded capacity for a fraction of the cost to themselves. Everyone wins.
Passenger rail is almost totally irrelevant to I-75 traffic. The interesting question is why they aren't trying to do HOT lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,876,648 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Passenger rail is almost totally irrelevant to I-75 traffic. The interesting question is why they aren't trying to do HOT lanes.
It seems like a waste to build HOT lanes in non-large metro areas, who would use them if the 'free' lanes are flowing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 07:08 AM
bu2
 
24,107 posts, read 14,896,004 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
It seems like a waste to build HOT lanes in non-large metro areas, who would use them if the 'free' lanes are flowing?
Maybe that's their thinking. But it would provide an alternative if there is congestion, which they seem to expect. Texas put an 85 mph speed limit as an incentive on one of theirs that runs parallel to (but not immediately adjacent to) I-35. Most non-urban toll roads don't have parallel freeways close by.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 08:57 AM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,946,602 times
Reputation: 1134
Trucks need their own lanes, those free of cars completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,621 posts, read 5,938,534 times
Reputation: 4905
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
It seems like a waste to build HOT lanes in non-large metro areas, who would use them if the 'free' lanes are flowing?
Every single experienced spring break driver who knows how bad 75 can get. Same with holidays. The traffic to/from Florida is crazy. I don't think it's actually realistic, but IF they existed I would probably use them more than the free lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top