Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-16-2017, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,863,148 times
Reputation: 5703

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnetar View Post
Parts of Atlanta have great transit availability, other parts don't. No one ever argued otherwise. Obviously, the areas being pitched to Amazon are the ones with strong transit connectivity.

Overcrowded trains aren't on their own a sign of a highly-functioning transit system.
Exactly, the 7:54am westbound Blue Line train this morning was packed, not crush loads, but very busy for what some posters on here call a horrible transit system.

 
Old 10-16-2017, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,863,148 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
Our metro area should have at least a proportionate amount as many transit stations/miles of track as theirs, given our metro population (over half of metro Chicago's), and our density levels vs theirs.

Particularly in the commuter rail department. They have 241 stations! Just give us 60 commuter train stations, that would make all the difference. Instead of 0.
People would still complain about having to transfer from CRT to HRT in the CBD and would use it as an excuse to drive.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,863,148 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconographer View Post
Agree. Improvements need to come in the form of better coverage and shorter wait intervals on both bus and train schedules. In other words, we need more $$$$ for MARTA.
BRT running in fully-dedicated lanes.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 09:23 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,083,751 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
BRT running in fully-dedicated lanes.
Works beautifully for Seattle.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,693,421 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconographer View Post
Works beautifully for Seattle.
And yet they're still rushing to build out a stronger rail network.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 11:25 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,083,751 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
And yet they're still rushing to build out a stronger rail network.
Why not?
Most of my neighbors and I regularly took the 130 Express from West Seattle to Downtown. Circumventing the always present traffic clogs was a great incentive along with timeliness and reliability of it.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,261,099 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Exactly, the 7:54am westbound Blue Line train this morning was packed, not crush loads, but very busy for what some posters on here call a horrible transit system.
It's not what exists that's lacking, but what doesn't exist.

If the Blue Line didn't even exist, the Gold Line would still be packed. If it only went as far north as Lindbergh, it would be packed. Being packed is not an indicator for a transit system effectively covering a metro area.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,863,148 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
It's not what exists that's lacking, but what doesn't exist.

If the Blue Line didn't even exist, the Gold Line would still be packed. If it only went as far north as Lindbergh, it would be packed. Being packed is not an indicator for a transit system effectively covering a metro area.
You have called MARTA useless, yet the hundreds of thousands of trips taken daily would disagree. Could it be better, yes, and if Cobb, Gwinnett, and Clayton would have opted in 40 years ago, who knows would it could be. But that does not mean the South's only subway system, should be the blamed for what it does not serve. Why isn't GRTA or the county-based transit agencies serving those areas with high capacity transit?
 
Old 10-16-2017, 11:44 AM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,752,224 times
Reputation: 1967
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Exactly, the 7:54am westbound Blue Line train this morning was packed, not crush loads, but very busy for what some posters on here call a horrible transit system.
The haters gonna hate.
 
Old 10-16-2017, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,261,099 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
You have called MARTA useless, yet the hundreds of thousands of trips taken daily would disagree. Could it be better, yes, and if Cobb, Gwinnett, and Clayton would have opted in 40 years ago, who knows would it could be. But that does not mean the South's only subway system, should be the blamed for what it does not serve. Why isn't GRTA or the county-based transit agencies serving those areas with high capacity transit?
I have never once in my life blamed the leadership or management of MARTA for our lack of transit in Metro Atlanta. Its being useless or next to useless for most people, is fact, but is not its fault. I thought that was clear since I specifically note that a billion times every time I talk about this stuff. Yet you take offense.

MARTA is useful for the small % who do use it every day. Great. That's good.

It's useless for a lot people who live far OTP, or who don't work at a major job center. That's at least understandable.

But it's also useless for the vast majority of people who live in the city and ITP and in MARTA-served counties. That's not good.

No need to get defensive when I am just stating the obvious here, which is backed by the statistics and just simple observation. Everyone drives everywhere every day around here. Generally speaking. Only way we're going to get more people to ride MARTA is if we vastly expand MARTA, and vastly expand regional transit connections in general, in any way we can. Also if parking requirements are looked at in the city and such.

Don't confuse that with someone who blames MARTA's leadership for not doing the right things or whatever. That's a very tiny part of the issue at most. The huge part of the issue is lack of outside funding and support for MARTA, and suburban counties not allowing MARTA to operate there. Just the whole general situation with transit opposition in GA. (And opposition to raising taxes in order to properly fund the services we need, etc.)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top