Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2008, 12:51 PM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,944,684 times
Reputation: 1134

Advertisements

While some might say that I would be a bit bias, this article tends to back up my contention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2008, 12:57 PM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,090,617 times
Reputation: 16856
Looks like a pretty self-serving article to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 01:00 PM
 
9,124 posts, read 36,382,644 times
Reputation: 3631
I'd say everyone involved in that article is biased too- a relocation magazine, homebuilders, etc.- so how do they "back up your contention"? That's like asking a bunch of used car salesmen if you should buy a car from their lot.

That aside, it's a better time to buy now than it was a few years ago, provided that you're willing to accept the fact that your house may go down in value for a while before it starts to go back up, and if you're willing to stay in your house for more than a few years. If you're looking to buy a house and resell it at a huge profit in two years, or if you're not sure if you're ready to commit to an area for the long-term, now is definitely not the time to buy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 01:08 PM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,944,684 times
Reputation: 1134
How about this one from CNN.com & money magazine

"The best place to buy a home these days"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
739 posts, read 830,734 times
Reputation: 279
I think the best time to buy, assuming you're primary objective is getting the lowest price, is going to be somewhere between this Fall (Oct/Nov) and Summer of 2010. We've got a long way to ride this mule before we get to the other side!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 01:14 PM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,944,684 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobKovacs View Post
I'd say everyone involved in that article is biased too- a relocation magazine, homebuilders, etc.- so how do they "back up your contention"? That's like asking a bunch of used car salesmen if you should buy a car from their lot.

That aside, it's a better time to buy now than it was a few years ago, provided that you're willing to accept the fact that your house may go down in value for a while before it starts to go back up, and if you're willing to stay in your house for more than a few years. If you're looking to buy a house and resell it at a huge profit in two years, or if you're not sure if you're ready to commit to an area for the long-term, now is definitely not the time to buy.
One could make that argument for any investment, not just housing. If all investments were guaranteed, then it would not be an investment at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 03:11 PM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,944,684 times
Reputation: 1134
"Still, the data suggest that the declines in sales and prices may be slowing. 'While it remains too early to definitively call a bottom, we continue to argue that home sales will stabilize [albeit at very low levels] by midyear,' said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich Capital, in a note to clients."

Home Sales Fall, but Signs of Stability Emerge
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 03:30 PM
 
9,124 posts, read 36,382,644 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by scgraham View Post
One could make that argument for any investment, not just housing. If all investments were guaranteed, then it would not be an investment at all.
See, therein lies the problem. It's only in the past decade that housing started being thought of primarily as an "investment" as opposed to "someplace to live and/or raise a family". If people started thinking more long-term, and saved/invested money like our parents did, instead of relying on their homes to be their financial source and retirement fund, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 03:33 PM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,090,617 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobKovacs View Post
See, therein lies the problem. It's only in the past decade that housing started being thought of primarily as an "investment" as opposed to "someplace to live and/or raise a family". If people started thinking more long-term, and saved/invested money like our parents did, instead of relying on their homes to be their financial source and retirement fund, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.
Too true...people act like this is the first time in history that you could actually lose money on the sale of a house, but 40 or 50 years ago it was quite common.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2008, 04:07 PM
 
5,438 posts, read 5,944,684 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobKovacs View Post
See, therein lies the problem. It's only in the past decade that housing started being thought of primarily as an "investment" as opposed to "someplace to live and/or raise a family". If people started thinking more long-term, and saved/invested money like our parents did, instead of relying on their homes to be their financial source and retirement fund, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.
While it isn’t one's primary investment, it is nonetheless an investment for many.

In my opinion, the population growth in Atlanta -- which is alluded to in the article -- should become a compensating factor for a stabilizing real estate market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top