Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 09:19 PM
 
1,961 posts, read 6,122,230 times
Reputation: 571

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rah62 View Post
You may have "invested" that power but I certainly haven't - but we'll just have to agree to disagree on that. That's why I vote Libertarian every single chance I get.
I've also "invested" the power for fire departments. If I understand the Libertarian doctrine only people that can afford to pay the fire department would get service. So the rich get their house protected and the poor get their house burnt to the ground.

Maybe I misunderstand the doctrine, I'm not an expert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2012, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,825 posts, read 2,826,725 times
Reputation: 1627
Just as your setting off fireworks that can very easily and readily have an effect on lots of other people's property is infringing on individual rights.

"Individual rights" rarely exist in a vacuum. You want to set off some device that has zero possibility of setting anything on fire on your own property and it's gonna stay there, stick it to the man and do it. But if the device you're igniting a) moves b) flies and c) is on fire and we're in the middle of a drought, your right to do whatever you like on your own property is superseded by your lack of any right to burn down your neighbors'.

Travis County does a lot of dimwitted nanny-state things, but I don't think for a moment that even the most left-leaning of our elected officials think they're going to keep down the sheep by taking away their fire...particularly when they let us keep the guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2012, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,422,673 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by rah62 View Post
The ban is most certainly not a formality - it's an infringement on individual rights. My lord, has everyone turned into sheep?

PS: Looks like Williamson County lifted their restrictions last December. I was going to relocate there to stay away from the Austin bag ban, but it looks like there are other good reasons to move there as well.
1. Your location is listed as Palm Springs, CA, so I fail to see the relevance of this to your life.

2. It's an infringement on individual rights to ban all fireworks due to fire danger? Where do you see that in the Constitution?

3. You would move to another county to avoid a bag ban? Really? REALLY?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2012, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,825 posts, read 2,826,725 times
Reputation: 1627
Quote:
If I understand the Libertarian doctrine only people that can afford to pay the fire department would get service
Libertarian thread hijack alert!

There is no "libertarian doctrine." Just like any other political idea, there are libertarians who are entirely comfortable with government services like police and fire and there are "get off my lawn" libertarians who don't even like those things. The difficulty with libertarianism, not unlike the tea party, is that by their nature they are not inclined to either centralized authority ("let's elect a chief libertarian") or in-your-face grandstanding because most of us sincerely don't want to bother you any more than we'd like you to bother us.

But any libertarian with half a brain knows that, just as happens with fireworks, individuals left to their own devices are quite capable of causing havoc outside their own property boundaries, and most libertarians I know are quite comfortable with local government limiting that sort of thing, especially if the limits are temporary (during a drought).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2012, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,422,673 times
Reputation: 10759
Yeah, to get this back on topic, I see that the big fireworks shows we're all used to have been TENTATIVELY OK'd for this year...

Austin Symphony to perform on July 4; fireworks get preliminary OK
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2012, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/London, UK
709 posts, read 1,400,836 times
Reputation: 488
I hope they have at least the DT fireworks show this year. The one OpenD linked. I really like it. I don't think it is close to as bad out there as it was last year, but I am still kinda scared of people doing lots of fireworks like in normal year. I think mostly because all those fires from last summer are still so fresh on our (my) minds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 01:22 AM
 
Location: Wrightwood, California
2,098 posts, read 3,458,281 times
Reputation: 884
Quote:
Originally Posted by rah62 View Post
you may have "invested" that power but i certainly haven't - but we'll just have to agree to disagree on that. That's why i vote libertarian every single chance i get.
Are fireworks allowed this year?-roflbot.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,268 posts, read 35,619,033 times
Reputation: 8614
Quote:
I hope they have at least the DT fireworks show this year. The one OpenD linked. I really like it. I don't think it is close to as bad out there as it was last year, but I am still kinda scared of people doing lots of fireworks like in normal year. I think mostly because all those fires from last summer are still so fresh on our (my) minds.
I flew in over the Bastrop area recently, and besides the obviously visible fire damage, there are also a huge number of dead trees in undamaged areas. Presumably, this is due to the drought, but in any case, it provides a massive amount of fuel for any potential fire.

I will say that I was encouraged last year by the silence last year on the 4th of July. Fireworks have been illegal in the city limits from as far back as I can remember, but I always hear tons and tons of fireworks being shot off. Last year, not a single pop. To me, that says more about people caring for the neighbors and their city than any fireworks would say about the patriotism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
1,317 posts, read 4,056,312 times
Reputation: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
I will say that I was encouraged last year by the silence last year on the 4th of July. Fireworks have been illegal in the city limits from as far back as I can remember, but I always hear tons and tons of fireworks being shot off. Last year, not a single pop. To me, that says more about people caring for the neighbors and their city than any fireworks would say about the patriotism.
Well said!

And I live in a neighborhood where the 4th and NYE is like WWIII every year and last year, it was quiet - not one single pop at all. I too have caring neighbors, thankfully!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2012, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
578 posts, read 1,227,481 times
Reputation: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm57553 View Post
I know the burn ban was lifted. So does that mean that fireworks will be allowed in Travis County this year?
I don't see any reason why they wouldn't be allowed. Short term indicators like soil moisture, 30, 60, 90 day precipitation, and fuel moisture are all fine. Yes, we are still in a drought, but that is a hydrological drought and has nothing to do with the factors that need to be considered for setting off fireworks. Besides, you should always be careful and vigilant when setting of fireworks no matter the conditions, that is just common sense.
On the below website, the Keetch-Byram index is the best indicator for fire potential, and central Texas is doing just fine. Wouldn't it be nice if we could base actual decision on science instead of feelings and politics....
Texas Forest Service
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top