Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2012, 06:27 AM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,278,461 times
Reputation: 2575

Advertisements

Effective Monday

Austin returns to Stage I water restrictions Monday - YNN - Your News Now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2012, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
499 posts, read 1,306,367 times
Reputation: 361
Is this wise? Travis and Buchanan are still only 50% full.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,637,527 times
Reputation: 8617
Watering is actually a relatively small part of total water usage, compared to evaporation (nothing we can do about that) and ag use downstream (it has been cancelled for this season). Anyway, while I agree we should still watch our water usage, I can (sometimes) actually use less when there are two days per week. Currently, on Sunday morning, unless it is currently pouring rain, I pretty much have to water my lawn deeply, because if some forecast rain does not occur, I then technically have to wait until next weekend. With two days a week, I can 'push' the watering until the next date and hope that some rain occurs. Likewise, if it rains on Thursday or Friday, I can opt to put off watering until the next Thursday instead of being compelled to water again on Sunday.

Anyway, I have always thought they should just make the third tier of water use waaaay higher...then people would 'voluntarily' stop watering too much .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:09 PM
 
4,710 posts, read 7,102,284 times
Reputation: 5613
I agree with Trainwreck. I have been double watering on Sundays, but still have to do some hand watering of a few beds later in the week. Having another watering day doesn't mean that I will use much more, just that there is more flexibility. I'm hoping to put in a more xeriscaped front yard, but not until next year, so I have to keep up the lawn until then, I guess. I'm slowly working on decreasing the amount of turf in the back yard, and every now and then I have made enough progress that I can cap a sprinkler head, but it is a lot of work, and takes a lot of time. I'm thinking of getting someone to help me out, but have been puttering along on my own so far. The rain makes me feel much less nervous about my trees, which I value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
499 posts, read 1,306,367 times
Reputation: 361
Yeah well not everybody is that water-smart otherwise we would never need restrictions


Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
Anyway, I have always thought they should just make the third tier of water use waaaay higher...then people would 'voluntarily' stop watering too much .
I agree, pricing--maybe variable based on the drought situation--is a great way to reduce use. Austin has a pretty steep tier system (could be steeper!) but I think Austin Water ought to require the same tier system for WCIDs that purchase water bulk from the city. Parts of West Lake Hills e.g. have rates way cheaper for high water users, even though it's the same treated water from COA plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 02:01 PM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,278,461 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by owlman View Post
Austin Water ought to require the same tier system for WCIDs that purchase water bulk from the city. Parts of West Lake Hills e.g. have rates way cheaper for high water users, even though it's the same treated water from COA plants.
Just curious. Is your goal to reduce water usage from the Colorado River, or reduce the capital costs of Austin's water infrastructure?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
499 posts, read 1,306,367 times
Reputation: 361
Well, 5 years ago I would have said the goal is reducing usage to save costs and prevent/delay the need for WTP4, but now that's moot. I do think reducing usage is still admirable simply for supply stability in times of drought.

I guess my post above is more about fairness/jealousy now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2012, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Austin, Tx
316 posts, read 877,281 times
Reputation: 201
Austin water utility's finances are dependent on heavy lawn watering during the summer months. If usage shrinks (very likely with the lovely rains we have had this year) they will have to raise rates even more.

And rates are projected to rise every year for the foreseeable future. Punitive rates for higher tiers are coming for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 12:42 AM
 
Location: In a state of denial
1,289 posts, read 3,035,849 times
Reputation: 954
I don't water my yard because of the cost. Every year my lawn grows back anyway. The only things I water are my bushes and plants (hand watering). We all three take showers and my water bill was $28.00 this month, which includes laundry and dish washing too.

Restrictions really don't affect us because we are frugal with our water because of cost, not because it does or doesn't rain a certain amount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,637,527 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Restrictions really don't affect us because we are frugal with our water because of cost, not because it does or doesn't rain a certain amount.
Yup, that is the intent of the tiered billing system. A frugal household can probably get almost entirely into the lowest tier, and a typical one can fairly easily stay in the second tier.

Interesting article I ran across if you want to see some numbers:
Again, environmentalists shouldn't bash Austin's steep water prices - Austin Contrarian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top