Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-30-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,478,210 times
Reputation: 18992

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by austin-steve View Post
True,

But for certain situations, displacement and relocation can be more expensive than the accrued taxes. What I don't know for sure is what happens if:
a) The owner passes
b) The home is sold
c) the tax bill exceeds the proceeds of the sale.

I would think it would be like any other debt, like credit card debt, that the bill is owed by the estate but if the estate cannot pay, it simply goes away.

Now, if there are kids in the picture who want to inherit and maybe someday live in the house, they'd better do the math on all this.

Steve
Exactly what I'm thinking, and if what I am reading is correct, then that's messed up! My mother (in the thought process of relocation) wants to buy a house and have it willed to me, as her heir, when she passes. If I do NOT want to sell the house, but rather hold it for family purposes, we would get socked with a MONSTROUS tax bill (over $50K) since it would be accruing from day one until the change of ownership. If she lives into her 80s or 90s (which I pray that she does), the math definitely can add up and be very crippling to the new owner.

On the other hand, if she isn't working, she'd be living off investments and proceeds from the sale of her house in NYC. While substantial on paper, when doled out over the months, it isn't a lot at all. She is vascillating between wanting to pay for a home down here outright or carry a smaller mortgage. Either way, when you factor in property taxes, it stinks. Property tax payments of $400-$500 per month, or $4000-5000 if you don't escrow are quite hefty for someone who isn't employed and they're never-ending. At least the mortgage goes away once paid off! I could approach my mom about paying the taxes while she's alive, but I'd feel awkward about that because I'd hate for my mother to have to worry about such a big bill when she should focus on enjoying her remaining years. Chances are, I would not suggest that she pay the taxes while alive.

At the same time, if she does want to will the property to me and defers the taxes, then we'll get screwed later on in a big way. It's like the county forces many people to sell the properties because the tax bill would be very high and would take a toll on our personal savings. That's crazy and ridiculous. Real estate taxes should be at a reduced rate for seniors PERIOD. Forget the deferred crap. Also, once the person dies, then an amount (not the whole thing PLUS INTEREST and penalties) should be paid by the estate.

The above poster who stated that retirees should think twice about Texas is kind of spot on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2013, 02:53 PM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,277,620 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
Real estate taxes should be at a reduced rate for seniors PERIOD. Forget the deferred crap. Also, once the person dies, then an amount (not the whole thing PLUS INTEREST and penalties) should be paid by the estate.
There is no penalty because of the over 65 deferral. If one thinks the 8% interest rate is onerous, then they are free to get a HELOC to pay the taxes at rates just under 4%. But the bottom line is, Texas schoolchildren depend upon property taxes to fund their education. That is the system we have here, for better or worse. To preserve the value of an estate by reducing the deferred taxes is taking money from those schoolchildren to give to the heirs. Sorry - can't go for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,478,210 times
Reputation: 18992
Quote:
Originally Posted by scm53 View Post
There is no penalty because of the over 65 deferral. If one thinks the 8% interest rate is onerous, then they are free to get a HELOC to pay the taxes at rates just under 4%. But the bottom line is, Texas schoolchildren depend upon property taxes to fund their education. That is the system we have here, for better or worse. To preserve the value of an estate by reducing the deferred taxes is taking money from those schoolchildren to give to the heirs. Sorry - can't go for that.
How is that "giving to the heirs"? I'd probably not sell my mother's home, so there's no money going into my pocket. Yet if I don't sell it, then a very substantial tax bill would be due that can be an onerous burden. I'm not saying that taxes shouldn't be paid at all..I'm saying that they should be reduced for senior citizens. I feel $400/mo. is too much for an older person on a fixed/limited income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,633,631 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Interesting. But assuming a 2.4% (of value) annual tax bill, and historic 4.5% annual appreciation (in Texas), it doesn't seem like the tax bills would ever outrun the value of a free-and-clear home, unless compound interest starts kicking in.
To make the equation more complex, most people availing themselves of the deferral will have the senior tax exemption, that will keep the deferred taxes somewhat lower than a non-senior. Just because you defer does not mean you can't claim the various exemptions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,633,631 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
I'd probably not sell my mother's home, so there's no money going into my pocket.
Yes, the unpaid taxes would be going into your pocket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 03:25 PM
 
1,430 posts, read 2,375,758 times
Reputation: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
I'm not saying that taxes shouldn't be paid at all..I'm saying that they should be reduced for senior citizens. I feel $400/mo. is too much for an older person on a fixed/limited income.

Um, freezing them at 65 is a reduction, a big one. Be content with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 10:02 AM
 
4,710 posts, read 7,101,396 times
Reputation: 5613
Can you take the homestead, disabled and over 65 exemptions all at the same time (in Austin, not Georgetown?) I have an understanding that you can only take disabled OR 65, but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Avery Ranch, Austin, TX
8,977 posts, read 17,550,348 times
Reputation: 4001
Quote:
Originally Posted by BocaJunior View Post
I think you're right - pretty sure they're the same exemption. 100% disabled veteran might be different. You can always call the CAD and they'll let you know, they're surprisingly easy to work with for a government entity.

No reason to mention Homestead as a benefit for seniors...it's available to anyone who qualifies...AND it's not a heck of a lot of money in any event.

AND a freeze is not a 'reduction'...it simply caps the INCREASE potential.(Not the correct term since no already existing amount is actually 'reduced'.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,063,260 times
Reputation: 9478
Quote:
Originally Posted by G Grasshopper View Post
Can you take the homestead, disabled and over 65 exemptions all at the same time (in Austin, not Georgetown?) I have an understanding that you can only take disabled OR 65, but I could be wrong.
That is correct, you can only take one, he disabled or over 65 exemption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,478,210 times
Reputation: 18992
My question is this: if we do not intend to sell my mother's house, then there will be a nice, large tax bill waiting for us, right? I also agree that a "freeze" is not a reduction and it comes down to two things - either the senior pays the taxes each year or the estate will have to if they do not intend to sell the house. Something to consider when you are future planning. I'm not saying this because I plan to make any profit off the sale of my mother's house because I do not intend to sell her house and would like to keep it in the family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top