Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2017, 08:58 AM
 
8,007 posts, read 10,426,646 times
Reputation: 15032

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Where in the world did you get that idea?

Loop 360 - Capital of Texas Highway

http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot...nal-report.pdf

"To achieve long-term relief (10+ years):
• Over/underpasses - Continue environmental clearance and design of all major
intersections to systematically eliminate all traffic signals and at-grade crossings of Loop
360 between US 290/SH 71 to US 183."


And that's _before_ Austin's 2016 mobility bond kickstarted it.


TxDOT windfall includes $620 million for four Austin highways

Now they're expected to start construction in 2 years or so.
https://communityimpact.com/austin/n...nges-loop-360/

"The study aimed to provide that vision by outlining projects that could occur in the next 20 years."

They will START improvements, but the full, completed project will not be done for decades. There was also a critical article about this in the Statesman, but it's not letting me search for it.

Even your linked document doesn't give a timeline for overpasses. It talks about adding lanes and the timeline for that, but when it comes to overpasses (which are what's really needed), it just says it depends on how many can be funded at one time, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2017, 09:44 AM
 
2,602 posts, read 2,980,301 times
Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnivalGal View Post
https://communityimpact.com/austin/n...nges-loop-360/

"The study aimed to provide that vision by outlining projects that could occur in the next 20 years."

They will START improvements, but the full, completed project will not be done for decades. There was also a critical article about this in the Statesman, but it's not letting me search for it.

Even your linked document doesn't give a timeline for overpasses. It talks about adding lanes and the timeline for that, but when it comes to overpasses (which are what's really needed), it just says it depends on how many can be funded at one time, etc.
The overpasses are coming _before_ lanes.

The money is already allocated. $250M.

http://www.mystatesman.com/news/tran...F4Ua3zddNJLoN/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,575,994 times
Reputation: 5957
I used to hate the idea of toll lanes, but when I think of them as public transit/emergency lanes, I come around to it. Two toll lanes in each direction is just a cash grab by crony capitalists though. You'll have to endure years of construction so that a road you can't afford will be put underneath downtown with no aesthetic or traffic benefits to you. The three-level design that comes with having two toll lanes in each direction is needlessly complex as well (I am well within my professional expertise to say that).

Anything short of Option 2 in this video (at 00:20) is settling for less and TxDOT being a corrupt organization. I'm really disappointed to read this new plan. Is one more toll lane really worth it? Would you really trade this for an eyesore like 635?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1lVBzL90r4

Last edited by Westerner92; 10-31-2017 at 11:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,888,792 times
Reputation: 7257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
I used to hate the idea of toll lanes, but when I think of them as public transit/emergency lanes, I come around to it. Two toll lanes in each direction is just a cash grab by crony capitalists though. That's called a toll road on public ROW. The three-level design that comes with having two toll lanes in each direction is needlessly complex as well (I am well within my professional expertise to say that).

Anything short of Option 2 in this video (at 00:20) is settling for less and TxDOT being a corrupt organization. I'm really disappointed to read this new plan. Is one more toll lane really worth it? Would you really trade this for an eyesore like 635?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1lVBzL90r4
My point exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 11:32 AM
 
2,602 posts, read 2,980,301 times
Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
Two toll lanes in each direction is just a cash grab by crony capitalists though.
within a week the flow in the Mopac lane was already stopped due to an accident.

The fact that Mopac is only one each way is an unfortunate result of funding limitations and extremely limited RoW. Two in each direction is what truly gives you the reliable lane for emergency/transit you like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,575,994 times
Reputation: 5957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
within a week the flow in the Mopac lane was already stopped due to an accident.

The fact that Mopac is only one each way is an unfortunate result of funding limitations and extremely limited RoW. Two in each direction is what truly gives you the reliable lane for emergency/transit you like.
There are two ways around that. 1) Don't put the pylons between the tolled lane and free lanes. Just separate with a 3' paint buffer and mark the toll lanes clearly. 2) Have there be two toll lanes in the middle that are reversible based off traffic patterns. Both are well-tested and work swimmingly.

(1) would have to be the way to go for Mopac because of the railroad obviously. Also, do you have any details on the accident? I'd have to assume it was a rear-ending accident, which is the result of an overcrowded lane, which is a result of an improperly priced lane.

Edit: Found the article. The culprit was indeed improper pricing.

Last edited by Westerner92; 10-31-2017 at 12:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 12:18 PM
 
2,602 posts, read 2,980,301 times
Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
There are two ways around that. 1) Don't put the pylons between the tolled lane and free lanes. Just separate with a 3' paint buffer and mark the toll lanes clearly. 2) Have there be two toll lanes in the middle that are reversible based off traffic patterns. Both are well-tested and work swimmingly.
1) helps slightly, but problematic as far as preventing people from darting in and out. You'd need a very heavy fine and monitoring process to keep it fully under control. And it still doesn't let the toll lane flow when you really need it (when the main lanes are already stopped/nearly stopped).

2) doesn't work if congestion flows both ways simultaneously. Which it does on downtown sections of both I35 and Mopac.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
(1) would have to be the way to go for Mopac because of the railroad obviously. Also, do you have any details on the accident? I'd have to assume it was a rear-ending accident, which is the result of an overcrowded lane, which is a result of an improperly priced lane.

Edit: Found the article. The culprit was indeed improper pricing.
No, that wasn't it. It wasn't just slow, it was completely stopped by a crash (crash outside of toll lanes, that pushed the car into the toll lane).

Still looking for a link, it may just have been on their facebook page.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,633,631 times
Reputation: 8617
My co-workers that use MoPac daily say there has been a pretty dramatic improvement in traffic flow, fwiw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,575,994 times
Reputation: 5957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
1) helps slightly, but problematic as far as preventing people from darting in and out. You'd need a very heavy fine and monitoring process to keep it fully under control. And it still doesn't let the toll lane flow when you really need it (when the main lanes are already stopped/nearly stopped).

2) doesn't work if congestion flows both ways simultaneously. Which it does on downtown sections of both I35 and Mopac.



No, that wasn't it. It wasn't just slow, it was completely stopped by a crash (crash outside of toll lanes, that pushed the car into the toll lane).

Still looking for a link, it may just have been on their facebook page.
(1) might not work in Texas because people tend to have the attitude that rules don't apply to them. I sometimes see people darting in and out of the toll lane on the Boulder Turnpike here, but if you have toll cameras set up every mile, people kinda just realize it's not worth it to break the rules. The honors system works better than tough enforcement in many cases. Having no physical barrier also makes it easier to find open spots in the free lanes.

With (2), I still think having the lanes flowing toward downtown in the morning and away from downtown in the evening would go a long way. In my experience doing a reverse commute much of the time I lived in Austin, most of the double-sided congestion on Mopac and 35 is limited to a couple miles within the core during rush hour, and most of that has to do with traffic backing up from people trying to get toward downtown in the morning and away in the evening.

Last edited by Westerner92; 10-31-2017 at 02:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2017, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,950 posts, read 13,339,664 times
Reputation: 14010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
My co-workers that use MoPac daily say there has been a pretty dramatic improvement in traffic flow, fwiw.
Well yeah, but is it any better than it was before they started the toll lane boondoggle in 2013?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top