Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Dallas via NYC via Austin via Chicago
988 posts, read 3,254,760 times
Reputation: 448

Advertisements

From now to the end of 2010, the economy of Austin, Texas, is projected to grow by $5 billion, and unemployment has stayed relatively subdued.

Which cities will and won’t recover fastest - Forbes.com- msnbc.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,036,040 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by latikeriii View Post
From now to the end of 2010, the economy of Austin, Texas, is projected to grow by $5 billion, and unemployment has stayed relatively subdued.

Which cities will and won̢۪t recover fastest - Forbes.com- msnbc.com
Much of it has to do with real estate as well.....Texas is the only large sunbelt state that didn't go crazy price wise, and they are reaping the benefits of that reticence now, as all the other large ones languish(Fla, Cal, Nev, Az)........The city of Austin has a huge budget shortfall now, and loan money for growth is hard to come by, so I'm still holdling my breath per the 5 billion growth.....job growth has just hit negative territory in June in Austin year-to-year, and the pop growth continues unabated, the primary reason Austin's UR currently is 7.1%, rising almost an entire percentage point in just the last month.....

Keep in mind that Forbes is largely PR fluff, and that Austin has cause for concern per the recession like every place else.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,630,016 times
Reputation: 8617
It is all relative, of course. Of the three people that I know personally that have been laid off, two have found work in Austin within 2 months, the other is moving to Alabama, but is actually getting a huge raise in the process (from what his pre-laid off salary was). Two co-workers have left voluntarily recently, one went to Ft. Worth, the other to Denver. Both were making career moves and found excellent jobs out there. Three of those five stayed in state.

I do know of a guy (don't really know him personally, though) that got laid off in the IT sector and has been looking for serveral months. But I can guarantee you, that with his attitude, he will have to get really lucky to get anything. In high-times, his talent was a necessity where he worked, but at the first oppurtunity, I am sure they were more than happy to let him go....it does come down to a lot more than your talent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,036,040 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
It is all relative, of course. Of the three people that I know personally that have been laid off, two have found work in Austin within 2 months, the other is moving to Alabama, but is actually getting a huge raise in the process (from what his pre-laid off salary was). Two co-workers have left voluntarily recently, one went to Ft. Worth, the other to Denver. Both were making career moves and found excellent jobs out there. Three of those five stayed in state.

I do know of a guy (don't really know him personally, though) that got laid off in the IT sector and has been looking for serveral months. But I can guarantee you, that with his attitude, he will have to get really lucky to get anything. In high-times, his talent was a necessity where he worked, but at the first oppurtunity, I am sure they were more than happy to let him go....it does come down to a lot more than your talent.
TW, you are right that it is largely personal as well.....some hapless folks can't find anything in a booming economy/time, while those that are relentless can find something viable in the worst of times anywhere....
and Austin surely IS far healthier than most places.....

I still recall that old line...
A recession is when your neighbor loses HIS job...
A depression is when you lose yours........

Sorta makes sense...it all depends on where you stand.....and what you make out of it yourself....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:02 PM
 
Location: New London County, CT
8,949 posts, read 12,134,556 times
Reputation: 5145
There is definitly a segment of people whose own attitude is their own worst enemy. No one owes anyone a job, and getting a job is a competition.

I know its harsh, but in a recession generally (not always) the best employees keep their jobs because they are valuable assets to the company and the bottom 10% are the ones in danger. Then again, the bottom 10% are always in danger-- but now, there isn't enough demand for them to find another job quickly. That having been said, I know there are times where good workers see their jobs eliminated due to seniority or other considerations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,630,016 times
Reputation: 8617
I am curious if there isn't a little economic Darwinism going on here.....do the people with the best skills (such as motivation, planning skills, organization, etc.) get up and go look for a job more readily than the less skilled? Is the influx of people we are seeing a better 'quality' of talent than those that do not get up and move?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,036,040 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
I am curious if there isn't a little economic Darwinism going on here.....do the people with the best skills (such as motivation, planning skills, organization, etc.) get up and go look for a job more readily than the less skilled? Is the influx of people we are seeing a better 'quality' of talent than those that do not get up and move?
Great point...i think so too...a Spencerism as well(look that scientist up to see what I mean).....indeed, those that have the whole package, and took time to build skills, are prob more industrious all-in-all than more hapless slacker types just clocking in, and complaining about externals, rather than building up their own "internals"....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Dallas via NYC via Austin via Chicago
988 posts, read 3,254,760 times
Reputation: 448
Good Article

[SIZE=2]http://impactnews.com/southwest-austin/news/3404-housing-shortage-may-cause-home-values-to-rise-by-2011 [/SIZE]
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 02:14 PM
 
434 posts, read 1,080,718 times
Reputation: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by latikeriii View Post
From now to the end of 2010, the economy of Austin, Texas, is projected to grow by $5 billion, and unemployment has stayed relatively subdued.

Which cities will and won̢۪t recover fastest - Forbes.com- msnbc.com
First i must confess i haven't read the linked article. But i feel safe to say that the projection of 5 billion growth for Austin is merely another BS by the proven idiots at forbes.

People who regularly read forbes (or forbes.com) and who can be honest with themselves should have little difficulty recalling that roughly 80% - 90% of forbes projections have turned out to be BS. and that's not counting major economic crises it has utterly failed to foresee over the years.

a magazine run by idiots, or a mouth piece for sale, or both?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,036,040 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinite45 View Post
First i must confess i haven't read the linked article. But i feel safe to say that the projection of 5 billion growth for Austin is merely another BS by the proven idiots at forbes.

People who regularly read forbes (or forbes.com) and who can be honest with themselves should have little difficulty recalling that roughly 80% - 90% of forbes projections have turned out to be BS. and that's not counting major economic crises it has utterly failed to foresee over the years.

a magazine run by idiots, or a mouth piece for sale, or both?
I wouldn't say it is for/by idiots......it IS a business journal, and, like CNBC, does chat up the marketplace.....our household calls Erin Burnett, Maria, and gang at CNBC paid cheerleaders for the marketplace and GE, who owns and pays CNBC's bills......People want to read that things are picking up in the mags. They want to hear that their portfolio is growing....They DO NOT want to hear bad news, and DO want to hear stories that pump up sectors/cities....hence the Austin PR posted on here from Forbes.....

The facts are such as these...Austin is NOT growing jobs now...it is LOSING them......the UR is going up, and was 7.1% last time they recorded the same.....More displaced job seekers than ever are moving TO Austin now......the Austin city revenue is VERY tight now.....local tax reveune is almost 20% down from last year.....

AND, if we get 3%+ pop growth the next 12 months, we HAVE to have at least 3% job growth just to maintain that same 7.1% UR......1.5% job growth + 3% pop growth still kicks the Austin UR up to 8.6% in 12 months.....

So, the issue is, can we handle the pop absorption with even a flat job situation, let alone a declining one?......I have not heard that mentioned anywhere here on CD, and would love to hear comments on the same...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top