Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2010, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,283 posts, read 2,735,982 times
Reputation: 1040

Advertisements

Good news for the folks in SW Austin and Southern Travis County! : The CAMPO board (Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization) rebuked Travis County Precinct 3 Commissioner Karen Huber and the Travis County Commissioners Court, voting 17 to 2, by letting SH-45 SW stay on the 2035 CAMPO transportation blueprint priority list (to receive federal matching funds and for construction).

All Commissioner Karen Huber got from her hidden opposition to SH-45 over her Precinct 3 constituents was knocking down a recommendation that TXDOT start the project in 2015, instead of 2020!

Texas 45 Southwest survives

Not only did closet, strict environmentalist Huber lose on the biggest issue of her commissionership but now her chances of re-election (in a race which she won by a razor-thin 2%) seem slim indeed. But, at least, Karen will get a pat on the back from Bill Bunch, SOS, and the Sierra Club!

Quote:
"We've got real priority problems in this plan," Huber said. "I cannot support this plan, because I cannot support business as usual."
Of course, Huber never said what those "priority problems" were and what "business" was being affected, though we could guess it was her environmental institutional donors (SOS, Sierra Club, & the ANC [Austin Neighborhoods Council]).

For the residents on Shady Hollow and Circle C, as Karen Huber reportedly said (with sarcasm),
Quote:
"You will probably get your road."
Was it worth it for Karen to fight her own voters (to no avail)?
Will it make life better for travel-clogged SW Austinites living in the fastest growing part of the city and Travis County?

What do YOU think?

Last edited by ImOnFiya; 05-25-2010 at 01:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2010, 07:57 AM
 
Location: 78747
3,202 posts, read 6,016,857 times
Reputation: 915
I think that starting the road in 2020 is still 10 years away!!

This gives me absolutely no reason to ever want to live in Hays or Shady Hollow still, and tells me that the poor souls who rely on Brodie can expect 10 more years of this, all the while watching it grow worse. I think Shady Hollow residents should barricade traffic incoming from 1626 like sans culottes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 09:03 AM
 
1,430 posts, read 2,374,893 times
Reputation: 832
Austin's road system is a disgrace. MOPAC/45 to I-35 south should have been constructed years and years ago. Have it run through a damn greenbelt if you need to to preserve water quality but having MOPAC just stop south is pure insanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 09:11 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,947,260 times
Reputation: 3545
Austin has a horribly planned highway/freeway system. Austin did have elaborate plans for freeways back in the day, but most of them were scrapped (and seem to be slowly coming back now).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,733,219 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface713 View Post
Austin has a horribly planned highway/freeway system. Austin did have elaborate plans for freeways back in the day, but most of them were scrapped (and seem to be slowly coming back now).
Well at least we aren't a maze if concrete and asphalt with tiny green specs in between like the ugliest city in Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 09:56 AM
 
10,130 posts, read 19,872,387 times
Reputation: 5815
I don't know how they can agree to fund a NEW highway when they don't include a penny to fix the existing problems -- like I-35. There is nothing in the plan to make any improvements on I-35, nothing for 360, and minimal for Mopac.

We don't need new highways when we can't even get the main arterials up to spec. Plus, TXDot builds the worst highways in the world -- terrible, sprawl-encouraging design. SH45 is simply going to help people get into the Mopac or I35 bottlenecks sooner, making them worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 10:04 AM
 
1,430 posts, read 2,374,893 times
Reputation: 832
Atxcio, actually having SR130 and MOPAC/45 helps a great deal with fixing I-35 since the through traffic can be diverted. Because we don't have a ring road system (bad design) we can't really remove 50 percent of I-35s capacity for five to ten years as is necessary.

As far as MOPAC bottleneck, that's almost purely a matter of an underdesigned bridge across the lake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Broomfield, CO
1,445 posts, read 3,267,006 times
Reputation: 913
What most people don't realize is that the city of Austin PURPOSELY spends no money on roads. They couldn't give a damn less if you sit in traffic on Brodie Lane or Mopac. Austin is the most congested medium size city in the country and the city couldn't care less. The city of Austin puts nearly ALL of their money into the downtown core of the city. They ONLY CARE ABOUT RICH PEOPLE moving into the city. They have no interest in anyone who doesn't live in or near downtown.

For those of you who choose to move to South Austin, you WILL be sitting in horrible traffic for decades to come. The city will not do anything about it. The tollroads were built by TxDOT and little if any of them are located in the Austin city limits. (i think just a small piece of Mopac north of Parmer MAY be in the ACL)

ANY road improvements done by the city (due to public pressure) will almost certainly be half assed and done as cheaply as possible. A good example of that is the discussion of restriping Mopac with smaller lanes to accomodate an additional lane that rich people will have the option of PAYING for to avoid heavy traffic. Unreal.

KEEP AUSTIN WIERD!!!



Quote:
Originally Posted by gpurcell View Post
Atxcio, actually having SR130 and MOPAC/45 helps a great deal with fixing I-35 since the through traffic can be diverted. Because we don't have a ring road system (bad design) we can't really remove 50 percent of I-35s capacity for five to ten years as is necessary.

As far as MOPAC bottleneck, that's almost purely a matter of an underdesigned bridge across the lake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 01:51 PM
 
4 posts, read 8,173 times
Reputation: 11
what company is doing the work?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 08:23 PM
 
Location: 78747
3,202 posts, read 6,016,857 times
Reputation: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by eepstein View Post

For those of you who choose to move to South Austin, you WILL be sitting in horrible traffic for decades to come.
Get it straight - If you actually lived in "South Austin" you wouldn't need a car because you would be between 0-4 miles from downtown. You must be talking about the far south/sw suburbs. For a little context, it takes me 20-25 minutes in bad traffic to get downtown (8 minutes without) and I live a stone's throw from the southern boundary of Austin. I wouldn't trade places with you, if that's what you're wondering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top