Quote:
Originally Posted by BCC_1
Because, as I said, the list you provided is airport pairs not city pairs. It's not rocket science.
|
Here are the rankings of the busiest domestic routes in the world.This list only tells part of the story, though. As mentioned, it is based on flight frequency rather than passenger loads.
Seoul Gimpo – Jeju: 79,640 flights
Melbourne – Sydney: 54,102 flights
Mumbai – Delhi: 45,188 flights
Sao Paulo – Rio de Janeiro: 39,747 flights
Fukuoka – Tokyo Haneda: 39,406 flights
Hanoi – Ho Chi Minh City: 39,291 flights
Sapporo – Tokyo Haneda: 39,271 flights
Jakarta – Surabaya: 37,762 flights
Los Angeles – San Francisco: 35,365 flights --------------- busiest in US
Jeddah – Riyadh: 35,149 flights
Cape Town – Johannesburg: 33,708 flights
Brisbane – Sydney: 33,443 flights
Cusco – Lima: 32,095 flights
Jakarta – Denpasar: 31,958 flights
Bogota – Medellin: 31,279 flights
Shanghai – Shenzhen: 29,401 flights
Beijing – Shanghai: 29233 flights
Jakarta – Makassar: 28,903 flights
Bengaluru – Delhi: 28,716 flights
New York JFK – Los Angeles: 26,286 flights
Seoul Gimpo – Jeju calculates to 79640 / 365 = 218 flights per day for the 280 mile route. Clearly they cannot efficiently use a large widebody jet, as the average flight to Jeju carries 186 passengers. As there are 1440 minutes per day /218 = 6.6 minutes between flights on average.
LAX-SFO calculates to 35149 / 365 = 96 flights per day in either direction. But the route is only 337 miles long, and cannot efficiently be flown with a widebody. But Los Angeles has multiple airports as does San Francisco, so you would get a much higher number if you calculated city pairs.
Sydney to Melbourne is only slightly longer at 439 miles, but that extra distance pretty much makes it an all-day trip driving. Unless you have a full automobile, it is probably always cheaper to fly than drive that distance. It may end up being the first route with standing (leaning) seating.