Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most Australian state?
Western Australia 4 22.22%
Tasmania 1 5.56%
Queensland 6 33.33%
South Australia 1 5.56%
New South Wales 5 27.78%
Victoria 1 5.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2023, 05:36 AM
Status: "Tyson K" (set 20 hours ago)
 
Location: In yo head
421 posts, read 220,015 times
Reputation: 300

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
True but Australia is young. One day hundreads of millions will be living here.
If we had cities dense like NYC or Paris, Australia would also be a global superpower with 200M or more and much more cities. It would be just like America but isolated and more beer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2023, 05:46 AM
 
Location: Perth, Australia
2,930 posts, read 1,308,387 times
Reputation: 1642
Quote:
Originally Posted by veshyvonny View Post
If we had cities dense like NYC or Paris, Australia would also be a global superpower with 200M or more and much more cities. It would be just like America but isolated and more beer.
Isn't Melbourne and Sydney fairly dense though? Five million is a big city.

I'd like to see more cities in Australia to add greater variety and options like the US
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2023, 06:22 AM
 
1,472 posts, read 1,343,410 times
Reputation: 1183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
Isn't Melbourne and Sydney fairly dense though? Five million is a big city.

I'd like to see more cities in Australia to add greater variety and options like the US
Yep, Sydney, Melbourne and even Brisbane offer plenty of options for inner city living. Most people, though, choose to live in the suburbs or even semi-rural residential areas.

As for a the number of cities, more doesn’t necessarily translate to greater variety. They each need something genuinely unique to set them apart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 05:47 AM
 
4,216 posts, read 4,885,486 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
Isn't Melbourne and Sydney fairly dense though? Five million is a big city.
The inner parts of Sydney are pretty dense – even somewhere like Bondi has similar density to inner London. Melbourne is noticeably more sprawly.

Of the top 50 densest suburbs in Australia, 45 are in Sydney.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization_in_Australia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 08:27 PM
 
6,036 posts, read 5,944,794 times
Reputation: 3606
Quote:
Originally Posted by veshyvonny View Post
Australian life is so suburban is disgusting, i wish we were a more actual "urban" country like France or England. Not like America.
I fully endorse that but most wouldn't. Even with Australia's rush to infill and increase density it doesn't seem to be a great success.

I suspect one would need to move to countries with such a preferred setting, than living in hope Australia will change to actually become more like those places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 08:29 PM
 
6,036 posts, read 5,944,794 times
Reputation: 3606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
Isn't Melbourne and Sydney fairly dense though? Five million is a big city.

I'd like to see more cities in Australia to add greater variety and options like the US
Rather sparse and sprawling compared to Euro levels. Both better than Perth obviously, which is among the most sprawling and auto dependent cities in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 08:32 PM
 
6,036 posts, read 5,944,794 times
Reputation: 3606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
The urbanized centres of Europe do bring lots of life but not much different than you will get In Sydney or Melbourne anyway. Australia like the US has so much more land that people in suburbia get to enjoy living with the amenities of a big city while also able to have a big house and garden. You usually have to compromise this if you wish to live in a big city In Europe unless your a millionaire
Actually quite different. Even the main centres are small in comparison to major European centres like London, Paris, Lisbon and so on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2023, 05:02 AM
 
Location: NSW
3,797 posts, read 2,993,610 times
Reputation: 1367
Quote:
Originally Posted by the troubadour View Post
Any suburban locality regardless of state. That is where most the population live and spend their lives. That is typical Australia.
Yes most Aussies live in suburbia, and not some outback post.
In saying that, and obviously I am biased, but NSW has a great spread of cultures and diversity , from Sydney to the “Back of Bourke “.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2023, 04:46 AM
 
1,764 posts, read 1,025,372 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy234 View Post
True but Australia is young. One day hundreads of millions will be living here.
That won't happen for over a hundred years' time. Not even get 100 million. Unlikely 50 million. It more likely be like: 38,089,401. Worldwide population growth rate is declining in most places. China population is expected to drop by half then, USA population will be unlikely to reach 400 million people then either.https://www.populationpyramid.net/po...-country/2100/

Only places with big growth are Africa and the Indian subcontinent then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2023, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Etobicoke
1,538 posts, read 867,371 times
Reputation: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by herenow1 View Post
That won't happen for over a hundred years' time. Not even get 100 million. Unlikely 50 million. It more likely be like: 38,089,401. Worldwide population growth rate is declining in most places. China population is expected to drop by half then, USA population will be unlikely to reach 400 million people then either.https://www.populationpyramid.net/po...-country/2100/

Only places with big growth are Africa and the Indian subcontinent then.
Your projections are quite conservative for 100 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top