Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Subaru
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2010, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,544,081 times
Reputation: 19539

Advertisements

It seems like based on MSN auto reviews that one of the trouble spots in this vehicle is the engine during several model years. If anyone has owned this vehicle for a long period of time have you run into any major troubles? It also appears that crash test ratings improved from 2003 on with a five star ranking. I have had MPG of close to 30 highway with another Subaru. How does the Forester rank on the highway? Is the overall value for a used car quite good in the 6-8K range? Thanks. I am considering the 03-06 model years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2010, 08:54 PM
 
11,555 posts, read 53,154,100 times
Reputation: 16348
03's-06's are well past the years of head gasket issues that Subie had starting in the 2.5 l 4-cam motor, so not a concern for your model years.

30 mpg with late model Subie's is a very realistic fuel economy. My wife gets 32-33 mpg with our 1995 Legacy Wagon (mostly cruising 60-65 mph), and I get 28-30 mpg with my 2001 Legacy Outback Limited at 75-78 mph. We live at 6,000' elevation, so the cars aren't as efficient as they might be at lower altitude.

If you need the AWD capability and the size of the car fits your needs, then the Subie can be a good value.

However, if you don't live in a climate zone where the AWD is of value to your driving, then there are other ... possibly better ... choices in the marketplace. One pays a penalty in fuel economy and performance with the AWD Subie's compared to many FWD cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:54 PM
 
224 posts, read 604,693 times
Reputation: 214
Had the headgasket issue on my 97 outback wagon, the problem was fixed in the current 2.5 range of engines
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 11:55 PM
 
224 posts, read 604,693 times
Reputation: 214
I own a 2005 legacy gt and the car has the 2.5 and the turbo and its 100k doing perfect
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 05:31 AM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,980,454 times
Reputation: 1032
I swear by the (4) Forester's we've owned. My Daughter totaled one recently however. We just bought her another '03 model for only $4000 (high miles).
The fuel economy of the Forester isn't as good as other Subarus though.
The Forester resale value normally remains quite strong.

Just don't burn any light bulbs out in the dash (see my rant thread).........LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,544,081 times
Reputation: 19539
Do the 02's have any troubles with the head gasket issue?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Southern NH
2,541 posts, read 5,849,513 times
Reputation: 1762
No, it was the 99 and earlier models that had the head gasket issue. We have an 01 subie forester that we got with 82k on it 4 years ago. It has 130k now and has been pretty good. The AWD is good in the NH snow. My teenagers drive it...
For more on the forester, go to the forum on this site:
SubaruForester.org
Lots of very knowledgeable Forester owners...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Vermont
11,755 posts, read 14,644,267 times
Reputation: 18518
We've owned three Subarus--they're practically the official car of Vermont. My wife loved her Forester.

They tend to be very, very reliable. I agree with the poster who said that you should only buy one if you need it for the AWD. You definitely pay a mileage penalty. In addition, whenever you replace a tire you need to replace all four, so that's an additional expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 08:59 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,980,454 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
whenever you replace a tire you need to replace all four, so that's an additional expense.
Huh???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 09:21 PM
 
Location: U.S.A.
3,306 posts, read 12,215,941 times
Reputation: 2966
Watch out for CV shaft and wheel bearing issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Subaru
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top