Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2010, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,928,948 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

A video from the UK, about how traffic moved twice as fast when the signal lights were turned off.

Experiment: Town in England turns off traffic lights, surprising results. [VIDEO]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2010, 03:07 PM
 
2,166 posts, read 3,382,580 times
Reputation: 2653
It may work for places like the UK where roads are narrower and curving, but this would be a disaster in most US cities. Our roads are built for higher speed and higher capacity and need the control that stoplights offer. The only gripe I have with stoplights is that they aren't properly timed half of the time, which is why cities need to start implementing smart stoplights that change based on traffic flow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:16 PM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,984,695 times
Reputation: 10569
There was a new light put in at an intersection on my route to work, it's at the end/beginning of a 50mph zone. Before the light traffic flowed smoothly, you almost always reached at least 50 when going away from the intersection, only problem was the occasional idiot that would pull out in front of traffic and cause a wreck.

Now, traffic is always backup up on the main road, and when getting the green I almost never even make it to 45mph in the 50 zone, irritating to say the least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:22 PM
 
Location: The land of Chicago
867 posts, read 2,138,890 times
Reputation: 1123
yeah i heard about this it might work in smaller towns but in medium/big size cities i think there would be too many cars, but its worth looking into
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 06:01 PM
 
Location: U.S.A.
3,306 posts, read 12,215,941 times
Reputation: 2966
They need to completely do away with timed lights and convert intersections to traffic sensing. I can't stand waiting at lights for no reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,515,251 times
Reputation: 8075
Our city is moving from under the road sensors to pole mounted cameras. This reduces operating cost (having to pull up road to fix a problem is expensive) as well as improve efficiency since they don't get the false readings like with under the road sensors. One particular intersection would regularly change to red on the main road because the sensor thought there was a car coming from the university.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Houston
441 posts, read 1,326,832 times
Reputation: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04JETTA View Post
yeah i heard about this it might work in smaller towns but in medium/big size cities i think there would be too many cars, but its worth looking into
:-)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjrEQaG5jPM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 07:19 PM
 
4,709 posts, read 12,669,699 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lux Hauler View Post
They need to completely do away with timed lights and convert intersections to traffic sensing. I can't stand waiting at lights for no reason.

All the lights are on sensors around here...but some are timed also. A town near here has at least a dozen lights in a mile or two. IF you drive the speed limit (35), you will make them ALL, 90+% of the time. Works pretty good.


As for turning of all traffic lights? Yeah, I'm sure traffic would move quicker....on the main roads. But how the hell would you get onto the the main road from side streets? Around here, at certain times, it would be nigh impossible!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2010, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,928,948 times
Reputation: 36644
The example in UK appeared to be in a smallish city, where the flow of traffic from both directions was approximately equal, and heavy enough to back up quite a few cars per cycle.

I don't really have any problem with 4-way stop signs. They seem to work well everywhere I've ever seen them. You stop, and then go because the cross traffic also stops. What's the problem?

I think in the video, people spontaneously and voluntarily treated it like a 4-way stop, prudently unwilling to drive into the intersection without stopping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2010, 12:32 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,138,905 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lux Hauler View Post
They need to completely do away with timed lights and convert intersections to traffic sensing. I can't stand waiting at lights for no reason.
Even worse is sitting there at 2 in the morning. Just turn the damn things to "blink" mode after 9pm. The traffic lights in Chicago (and the traffic engineering in general) are absolutely dismal. I hate driving in this city at any time of day or night thanks to the stupid traffic lights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailordave View Post
Our city is moving from under the road sensors to pole mounted cameras. This reduces operating cost (having to pull up road to fix a problem is expensive) as well as improve efficiency since they don't get the false readings like with under the road sensors. One particular intersection would regularly change to red on the main road because the sensor thought there was a car coming from the university.
Or better yet, when you get to sit there at a red light all day because the guy in the front of the line is on a motorcycle and it isn't heavy enough to trip the sensor. On one occasion I actually had to get out of my car and tell the guy to either move over or just run the damn light when there was a break in cross traffic so that a car could pull up and trigger the sensor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top