Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2012, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
I suggest, Fleet, that we call for a show of hands.

How many of you trashing the classics of the greatest era were even born yet in 1972?

That's what I thought. How 'bout 1982? I see....a couple more, but who were still in diapers.

Bottom line is how many of you rode in or drove a factory fresh Ford LTD, Chevrolet Caprice, Buick Wildcat, Pontiac Bonneville, or Cadillac Sedan Deville in the mid-to-late 60s?

Zero....but then we knew that - didn't we, Fleet.

Sad that none of you have a clue about what you missed.
Yes, CrownVic95, I mentioned that in another thread a few weeks ago. How many people under 30 years old have actually ridden in something like a 1975 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham or a 1977 Lincoln Continental? All they do is repeat the words "barge," "wallowing," etc.

I sure wish I could take some members here for a ride in my cars. They would learn a lot!

It is truly a great thing that '70s and earlier cars can still be seen, enjoyed and driven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2012, 04:41 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,711,220 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Yes, CrownVic95, I mentioned that in another thread a few weeks ago. How many people under 30 years old have actually ridden in something like a 1975 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham or a 1977 Lincoln Continental? All they do is repeat the words "barge," "wallowing," etc.

I sure wish I could take some members here for a ride in my cars. They would learn a lot!

It is truly a great thing that '70s and earlier cars can still be seen, enjoyed and driven.
Yes, they would.

For misinformation, this thread rivals some of those in the P&OC forum for turning reality 180 degrees on its head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
Yes, they would.

For misinformation, this thread rivals some of those in the P&OC forum for turning reality 180 degrees on its head.
Yes, it's a toss-up as to which has more misinformation!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 05:06 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
I suggest, Fleet, that we call for a show of hands.

How many of you trashing the classics of the greatest era were even born yet in 1972?

That's what I thought. How 'bout 1982? I see....a couple more, but who were still in diapers.

Bottom line is how many of you rode in or drove a factory fresh Ford LTD, Chevrolet Caprice, Buick Wildcat, Pontiac Bonneville, or Cadillac Sedan Deville in the mid-to-late 60s?

Zero....but then we knew that - didn't we, Fleet.

Sad that none of you have a clue about what you missed.
I keep giving away my age too. Those youngin's haven't met "cool" yet!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 05:13 PM
 
Location: The Circle City. Sometimes NE of Bagdad.
24,448 posts, read 25,978,821 times
Reputation: 59793
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
I suggest, Fleet, that we call for a show of hands.

How many of you trashing the classics of the greatest era were even born yet in 1972?

That's what I thought. How 'bout 1982? I see....a couple more, but who were still in diapers.

Bottom line is how many of you rode in or drove a factory fresh Ford LTD, Chevrolet Caprice, Buick Wildcat, Pontiac Bonneville, or Cadillac Sedan Deville in the mid-to-late 60s?

Zero....but then we knew that - didn't we, Fleet.

Sad that none of you have a clue about what you missed.
I'll take that bait even tho I was born pre 1972. I have either ridden or driven all of them except the Buick Wildcat.

Would I want any of them for a daily driver today? Absolutely not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 05:29 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,610,551 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopac1980 View Post
I know 1973 was the year of the 5mph bumpers and the smog pumps they were putting in the engines which hindered performance, I agree that 1972 was the first year of the NET horsepower ratings

The switch from SAE "gross" to "net" horsepower ratings had nothing to do with quality. It was simply a different measurement method.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 05:33 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,610,551 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
It's funny that a car that sold new for less than $3,000 is still on the road 40, 50, 60+ years but a car that sells for $40,000 gets thrown away after 10-15. That should tell everyone something.

??? Cars used to rust out after 5 years. Don't forget wages were much lower in 1970.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 05:56 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
??? Cars used to rust out after 5 years. Don't forget wages were much lower in 1970.
They still rust in the same conditions. Your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 06:18 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,610,551 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
They still rust in the same conditions. Your point?

Not like they used to.

My old '71 Chrysler Town & Country station wagon with a 383 handled like a pig, drank gas like no tomorrow (despite little emissions hardware), and wasn't even fast. So much for nostalgia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 06:33 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,670,625 times
Reputation: 3867
my folks got a new 66 Ford Galaxie 500 when I was 4 new so i rode in that for 9 years. very solid car except for peeling paint. it had a 289 V8 which probably got respectable gas mileage better than a Galaxie of 6 or 7 years later. replaced with a 75 Buick Century Regal which made the 66 Galaxie look like a piece of tin at that point!!! we thought the Ford was solid and quiet riding...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top