Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2012, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,454 posts, read 33,136,530 times
Reputation: 7594

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by motormaker View Post
I'll take that bait even tho I was born pre 1972. I have either ridden or driven all of them except the Buick Wildcat.

Would I want any of them for a daily driver today? Absolutely not.
My '76 Cadillac Limousine was my daily driver to work for 5 years. (Only 4.5 miles one way.)
It was great driving to work in a XL, luxurious, comfortable luxury car when others were driving to work in a cramped and uncomfortable econo-box.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2012, 08:13 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,635,110 times
Reputation: 13891
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
Not like they used to.

My old '71 Chrysler Town & Country station wagon with a 383 handled like a pig, drank gas like no tomorrow (despite little emissions hardware), and wasn't even fast. So much for nostalgia.
I don't think there's a soul on earth nostalgic for a '71 Chrysler Town & Country station wagon. Here's a better example, among many, of what we've lost....

Directory Index: Buick/1965
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 08:19 PM
 
Location: SW MO
662 posts, read 1,220,667 times
Reputation: 695
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
??? Cars used to rust out after 5 years. Don't forget wages were much lower in 1970.
Up here in South Dakota new ones still pretty much do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,715 posts, read 31,008,778 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
I suggest, Fleet, that we call for a show of hands.

How many of you trashing the classics of the greatest era were even born yet in 1972?

That's what I thought. How 'bout 1982? I see....a couple more, but who were still in diapers.

Bottom line is how many of you rode in or drove a factory fresh Ford LTD, Chevrolet Caprice, Buick Wildcat, Pontiac Bonneville, or Cadillac Sedan Deville in the mid-to-late 60s?

Zero....but then we knew that - didn't we, Fleet.

Sad that none of you have a clue about what you missed.
I was born in the 1950s. Good enough? There are 100 vehicles I would rather drive than the ones you listed. I like instant starting, nimble precise handling, power, safety, fuel economy, etc. None of those are present in your cars.

Styling is a purely subjective issue. I don't like 19 feet long cars that float on the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 08:27 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,635,110 times
Reputation: 13891
Quote:
Originally Posted by motormaker View Post
I'll take that bait even tho I was born pre 1972. I have either ridden or driven all of them except the Buick Wildcat.

Would I want any of them for a daily driver today? Absolutely not.
For any other reason besides gas prices?

Suppose you hypothetically transport today's tin cans back in time to when the classics of the greatest era were brand new and gas was .35/gallon. Which car is more desirable for your daily driver?

This....

Directory Index: Pontiac & Oakland/1968

or this?....

http://www.netcarshow.com/kia/2010-c...llpaper_02.htm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:04 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,547,633 times
Reputation: 3865
Default which car would you prefer?

it's 1975 and you have had a 9 year old Ford Galaxie or LTD. the car was good but now the paint is peeling, the brake master cylinder blew on the highway and you now want a new car. you get a 75 Buick Century or Regal

would the idea of getting a new 75 Century excite you or would you wished you could hang on to the old Ford?

i ask cause this is what my folks did

at the time i used to think how could anybody want to hang on to an old Galaxie when they can have a new Century, but there are exceptions

so would you prefer a 66 Galaxie/LTD or a 75 Century/Regal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,454 posts, read 33,136,530 times
Reputation: 7594
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
I was born in the 1950s. Good enough? There are 100 vehicles I would rather drive than the ones you listed. I like instant starting, nimble precise handling, power, safety, fuel economy, etc. None of those are present in your cars.

Styling is a purely subjective issue. I don't like 19 feet long cars that float on the road.
How many 19-foot long cars have you driven?

BTW, my '69 Cadillac Fleetwood (19.04 feet long) can sit in the driveway for 3-4 weeks and start up within 15 seconds of cranking the engine. And it has plenty of power (40-60 mph in 3.7 seconds). As for handling, since it can corner on curvy streets with a "35 mph" speed limit at 45-50 mph, it looks like it does well enough!

If it got 20 or 25 mpg instead of 11 mpg, it would be the perfect car for me. But since it's only been driven 254 miles in 4 years, fuel mileage concerns are at the very bottom of my list. BTW, I can see the ends of all four fenders from the drivers seat... try finding that visibility in a modern car!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:13 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,541,704 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlrl View Post
it's 1975 and you have had a 9 year old Ford Galaxie or LTD. the car was good but now the paint is peeling, the brake master cylinder blew on the highway and you now want a new car. you get a 75 Buick Century or Regal

would the idea of getting a new 75 Century excite you or would you wished you could hang on to the old Ford?

i ask cause this is what my folks did

at the time i used to think how could anybody want to hang on to an old Galaxie when they can have a new Century, but there are exceptions

so would you prefer a 66 Galaxie/LTD or a 75 Century/Regal?

1975 was the first year for catalytic converters which required more-expensive unleaded gas. 1975 was a bad year for cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,454 posts, read 33,136,530 times
Reputation: 7594
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlrl View Post
it's 1975 and you have had a 9 year old Ford Galaxie or LTD. the car was good but now the paint is peeling, the brake master cylinder blew on the highway and you now want a new car. you get a 75 Buick Century or Regal

would the idea of getting a new 75 Century excite you or would you wished you could hang on to the old Ford?

i ask cause this is what my folks did

at the time i used to think how could anybody want to hang on to an old Galaxie when they can have a new Century, but there are exceptions

so would you prefer a 66 Galaxie/LTD or a 75 Century/Regal?
I would pick a '66 Galaxie. Mainly because 1966 is one of my favorite years for cars. Although a '75 Buick Century/Regal is most likely more reliable than a '66 full-sized Ford.

Top 5 favorite years for cars:
1. 1969
2. 1970
3. 1966
4. 1968
5. 1965
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2012, 09:14 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,541,704 times
Reputation: 4531
[quote=Fleet;26121437]
BTW, my '69 Cadillac Fleetwood (19.04 feet long) can sit in the driveway for 3-4 weeks and start up within 15 seconds of cranking the engine. And it has plenty of power (40-60 mph in 3.7 seconds). As for handling, since it can corner on curvy streets with a "35 mph" speed limit at 45-50 mph, it looks like it does well enough!

quote]


My current 4-cylinder car hums along at 95 mph where the speed limit is 70mph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top